Rendlesham Forest 1980 Pt II - Will There Be An Answer?

Georgina get’s grilled in this interview …..

The following is the transcript of a "conversation" in which Georgina Bruni responds to Larry Warren's accusation that Georgina's book "has over 400 mistakes." Georgina has shared this with me for my interest but the decision to post it here is MY DECISION - I think it makes interesting reading.

Source …… Georgina Bruni Did Tell The People

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: Baablacksheep

I would think, that if the binary code happened…..Penniston, would have mentioned it in the production of the Strange But True episode. Wouldn’t you? Why would the producers hold that back? Was it probably mentioned, but ended up on the editing cutting room floor?

👽

When he finally did reveal the binary codes in 2010 he explained that previously they had been unimportant to him.



Mentioning, the symbols were no problem in 93. But I don't think he'd yet drawn them in his notebook at that time.

a reply to: mirageman

Hmmmm……from 1993 to 2010, is more than enough time to learn binary code and add that to the whole mix.

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1


Volume 1 of Glimpses of Other Realities, Linda Moulton Howe

Edition illustrated
Publisher LMH Productions, 1993
ISBN 0962057029, 9780962057021
Length 365 pages


Jim discuses the binary .

Anything is possible Ophi it's a very deep rabbit hole.

Correction, it might have been in the later book.

a reply to: mirageman


Ooh look, there's Linda!

a reply to: Baablacksheep

BB…..unless you can provide a link for a FREE book in PDF, without signing up at a website…….I’m not going to pay one red cent, one plumb nickel, one thin dime, two bits, one buck…….on a Howe book 😉

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I don't have a PDF Ophi but the transcript is around re what he said in the book. I certainly would not suggest you pay any money!!

If someone has it they can link it or will get what I have from my files. I don't have that particular book.

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: mirageman


Ooh look, there's Linda!

UFOlogy’s Diva’s ….. Howe, Bruni, Harris 🥴


👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Linda will be pretty well off after all these years spinning spin. Some of which is not entirely honest material. No comment re Harris🧐.

The late Georgina was pretty interesting though.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I covered it years ago earlier in the thread : link

a reply to: mirageman

How....time flies! Didn't Linda write in that book Jim saw a circular craft?

a reply to: mirageman

Ah yes…..

The mind is the first to go.

MM….perhaps this was already discussed many moons ago…..

But has there been any thought given to analyzing Penniston’s notepad in which he wrote the binary codes?

I’m speaking of forensic dating of the paper and ink, assuming he didn’t use a pencil, and used an ink pen.

Perhaps it would be useful to know, so as to establish a true date of binary code transcription entries.

Here’s a Source of that type of date analysis service for example….. INK DATING AND PAPER ANALYSIS Evidence may not be visible to the naked eye

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

I don't think forensic science can be that accurate unless you spend a huge sum of money.

There's a whole lot of information that points to the binary codes being created long after 1980.

I've explained it in more detail on the first page and the the same post I linked earlier

I think people gloss over it because it's boring as hell.

The key is that co-ordinates in the 'binary code' use map markers from Tele Atlas. Tele Atlas was not even founded until 1984 and was the map providers for Google Earth until October 2009. The month that Penniston revealed his binary code pages in a production meeting for Ancient Aliens (which were never seen by anyone else beforehand).

So there's a massive coincidence there, wouldn't you say?

a reply to: mirageman


I think this write up is enough for me to discount the notebook and it’s contents, ala binary code, symbols, etc..as being legit….imo

Jim Penniston’s notebook

Penniston! How could you???

I bet, today, he cannot, from memory, recall and re-write the second byte of the binary string on the first line on page 3 in his notebook …..let alone receive it telepathically.

BB……I know you want to believe 😉

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Jim has written more binary in 2011 and there are more glyphs too.
However that element is very much hidden or the attempt of. I have dealt with Ian many times in the past so am familiar with his findings/research too.

Jim is very very smart, but am not suggesting fraud, others have . Rather there is a whole lot more to this element.

All that aside . What about Gary Osborn's findings? Should that not be looked at considering his claims.


@MM the Phoenix gig was 2010.

a reply to: Baablacksheep

Unless I read this wrong……it appears you have some doubts about Gary yourself…..

One thing which stands out. Gary is riding on the back of the case and creating several books inspired from the code, or at least this is what he is saying. Perhaps there are a few £££ signs involved or other factors shaped into this? Too much noise, too many excuses and lack of anything of substance . Gary has fallen short re the sacred destination story . I would go as far as calling this "stupid". edit on 15-1-2018 by Baablacksheep

Do you still feel the same about Gary?

With me, I don’t really have an opinion about Gary either way …. perhaps he’s a sideshow….who knows.

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: mirageman


I think this write up is enough for me to discount the notebook and it’s contents, ala binary code, symbols, etc..as being legit….imo

Jim Penniston’s notebook

Penniston! How could you???

Ian Ridpath is the ultimate party-pooper, and his research impeccable, to the annoyance of virtually everybody with skin - and potential cash - in this RFI game.

He more or less solved and closed this entire case in 1983, before the audio recording even surfaced and virtually a generation before the original USAF statements were finally released to the public - no doubt to the absolute horror of Penniston who'd cultivated his own alternative narrative in the early 90s.

When Jim was confronted with his own words confirming he'd never got within 50m of the 'object' (which he drew as 'box'-shaped rather than triangular during his first ever written contribution), what alternative explanation could he give other than the ultimate tired old cliche: that they tampered with his statement... despite other witnesses confirming that this is not the case.

We know for sure that the incident occurred at 3am on 26th December. Penniston's notebook, when it finally surfaced, declares it happened around midnight (using "12..." rather than the USAF 24-hour scale) which is crucial to his alternative account that includes a 45-minute inspection of a craft, declared BS by Burroughs. The only "45 minutes" mentioned in his statement was the time period it took to return to base after the three men discovered they'd been chasing a beacon that distorted their perception as it seemed to 'move away' when they approached it in the forest.

As I said before, Vince Thurkettle was similarly spooked when he first resided in the forest, as were Colonel Halt and his merry band of men. If Burroughs had been allowed to join his team, he could have confirmed the exact same perceptions from 26th Dec as they trekked the same route - including bright reflections from the farmhouse window and accompanying animal sounds.

What of the later beams shining down? The team were spooked enough by that point to expect anything, and Ridpath provides a detailed, complex description of how this starlight effect could have been perceived considering the weather conditions that night. Halt has blatantly sexed-up the beams since 1980, declaring that they shine down towards his feet rather than being distant and seemingly 'over the base'.

After all the in-fighting, lies, BS and contradictions over 42+ years, I am once again left with the rather tragic sight of a bored and wet Halt standing in a field at 3.30am, having failed to confirm with radar what he seemed be seeing with his own eyes... before he got fed up and stomped back to base, seemingly not caring any more.

Perhaps it's FINALLY time that we all stopped caring, too.

a reply to: ConfusedBrit


👽🍻

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: ConfusedBrit

👽🍻

Cheers, Ophi.

Like Ridpath, I'm afraid it's very party-pooper-ish of me, but maybe a New Year needs a new broom to sweep away 42-year-old trash.

Nevertheless, it remains a VERY important case - albeit more for the benefit of psychology rather than ufology. A lesson for us all.

a reply to: ConfusedBrit

Yeah I think the UFO has just about flown the coop on the Rendlesham story…


👽😆