Rendlesham Forest 1980 Pt II - Will There Be An Answer?

a reply to: wobbs62


Here is a reminder.

m.facebook.com...

The November/December 2001 issue of UFO Magazine looks to have a “comprehensive review of the 20th Leeds international UFO conference” (page 14).

(Page 84 also features a piece on Rendlesham: A Question of Truth - A military ‘insider’ counters MOD claims over radar)

www.ebay.com...
AFU Shop

A check on Archive.org for site UFOmag.co.uk not turning up much, except the original video order page.

“Georgina Bruni gave a summary of findings concerning the Rendlesham Forest incident of December 1980, highlighting facts gleaned from her book 'You Can't Tell The People'; the recent release by the MoD of the Rendlesham Files; and several new and exclusive revelations which included a famous USAF witness who has now admitted for the first time that both he and possibly Colonel Charles Halt, Deputy Commander of RAF Woodbridge at the time, saw not lights from a distant lighthouse, or falling space debris, but aliens.”

Hope everyone is well–have a great Christmas!

a reply to: Baablacksheep I'm guessing whatever is claimed in the video will be welcomed with open arms...😁 happy RFI everyone.

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: wobbs62


Here is a reminder.

m.facebook.com...

Problem is that every time you signpost to that site it's pretty useless for anyone who doesn't have an account with facebook.

a reply to: wobbs62

Aaah the old Leeds Conference tape from over 20 years ago.



A lot of things have happened and become public knowledge since that conference. And Georgina is no longer here to clarify her words either.

a reply to: mirageman


You can see the actual post even if not a member of FB MM?

Can you and others see this one. Nick Pope promoting his Rendlesham book.

www.facebook.com...

Even Osborn is in the thread, upset re the binary code and folks not giving it much attention. Actually it was given a lot of attention once upon a time, until a lot went pear shaped .

I get amused by Nick, considering his co -author (John Burroughs) accused him of lying over the book? But then the " Rendlesham Enigma " by Penniston and Osborn is not 100 percent truthful either, quite a few porkies in that particular one. Still, both books are selling I guess. I feel sorry for the public at times as they are none the wiser.

Anyway, back to the Georgina Bruni video. Andrew Pike was present at that conference.

Happy New Year very soon!

a reply to: wobbs62

Wobb. I see larry drama starting up again. The show that never dies.

a reply to: Baablacksheep
Oh, I see there's lots of drama going on at the moment, much love being shared amongst the witnesses and researchers, it will never end.

a reply to: mirageman I still don't know what it is she supposed to of said although I know it's something to do with Larry, like that is going to change people's opinion of him anyway, they either believe him or they don't, just like they are with the other witnesses, this continuing bitch fest saga is enough to put off any witness of a ufo coming forward with their sighting.

a reply to: wobbs62

No end in sight at all!

a reply to: wobbs62

IIRC it is something to do in the way of an apology to Larry because Adrian had confirmed that Larry was there. However, that was 20 years ago (coming up to 21). A lot of water had passed under the bridge, and even more manure through the forest since. A lot of people have got fat on the industry that is Rendlesham Porkie Pies.

a reply to: this just confirms my point that RFI is so messed up now, whatever is said, the information won't be believed.
Because of this I don't believe we will ever find out the truth unless the governments release the secret documents.

Heeeeear’s Georgina…..



🍿🍕🍺

👽

The more I poke around about this case the more complex it seems, but not men in black this time, rather men in nuclear outfits.

Back to Georgina Bruni: her final source told a most sinister tale. It concerns a military base situated in the county of Norfolk, England. It borders the county of Suffolk, where the Rendlesham events happened. Royal Air Force Watton is a now-closed-down RAF facility that opened in 1939. It wasn’t until 1998 that the Station was sold, by which time it was in a very run-down state. The Airfield remained and still remains in the hands of the Ministry of Defense.” On October 25, 1988 Squadron Leader E.E. Webster of RAF Watton wrote me the following, after I raised questions about RAF Watton’s claimed connections to the Rendlesham Forest case: “Our log book for the period does indeed say that a UFO was reported to us by RAF Bentwaters at 0325 GMT on 28 December 1980 but that is all the information we have.” Apparently, though, it actually wasn’t “all the information we have.”

Someone – or an agency - was being decidedly economic with the facts, such as those facts were. Nick Pope revealed that Georgina Bruni’s RAF Police sources knew of a far greater story concerning RAF Watton than the brief one provided to me by Squadron Leader E.E. Webster in 1988. Apparently, on the very same night that staff at RAF Watton recorded the presence of a UFO (on December 28, 1980), a pair of military dog-handlers were patrolling the facility when something very strange happened. The pair was shocked and baffled to see just outside the perimeter fence a number of figures. No, they were not aliens. They were all too human: they were dressed in NBC (Nuclear, Biological and Chemical) outfits, head-to-foot. One of Bruni’s police sources revealed that he and his comrades were interviewed, questioned, and warned to remain silent with regard to what they had seen on that cold, winter’s night. Or, rather, who they had seen. And, no surprise: there are still new revelations surfacing.

mysteriousuniverse.org...

British made….Strange But True …..Rendlesham Forest

Part 1 of 3


Part 2 of 3


Part 3 of 3


🍿🍕🍺

👽

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
British made….Strange But True …..Rendlesham Forest

Part 1 of 3

.....

This sort of illustrates what Wobbs was saying. And the show was made in 1993 or 1994.

At about 2:20 mins in to the video above, we hear about an object picked up on radar. The radar operator, Mal Scurrah, made it clear after the programme aired that his description related to an event in late October or November of 1980 not the time of the Rendlesham incident. But the show's production team couldn't help spicing up the story with information that was unrelated.

Meanwhile, binary codes are yet to enter Penniston's account. He mentions symbols on the craft but does not produce his notebook with them for another decade! The obfuscation actually starts with Halts' memo in January 1981 where he gets the date wrong along with a few other inaccuracies.

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: mirageman


You can see the actual post even if not a member of FB MM?

Can you and others see this one. Nick Pope promoting his Rendlesham book.

www.facebook.com...

I can see the Nick Pope post facebook link without a facebook account, but mirageman is right, I can't see the earlier facebook link without a facebook account, all I see is this:



I don't understand facebook well enough to know why some posts are visible without an account and others require an account to see. I can usually see twitter posts without an account there.

a reply to: mirageman

Meanwhile, binary codes are yet to enter Penniston's account. He mentions symbols on the craft but does not produce his notebook with them for another decade! The obfuscation actually starts with Halts' memo in January 1981 where he gets the date wrong along with a few other inaccuracies.

What does this mean though when it comes to Jim's binary and Osborn. Osborn demonstrates or has demonstrated that the code authenticates itself bla bla. So who out there can validate all of his claims re the binary?


And, does it prove Jim knew nothing and all the rest of his claims and that it happened as he claimed it? Walked around the craft touched it, got zapped and wrote it down the next day......

a reply to: Arbitrageur

Hi Arbi. I understand. It might be that posts on Facebook are due to the settings people make. I will make a note of this in future.

a reply to: Baablacksheep

I would think, that if the binary code happened…..Penniston, would have mentioned it in the production of the Strange But True episode. Wouldn’t you? Why would the producers hold that back? Was it probably mentioned, but ended up on the editing cutting room floor?

👽