It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Broadsword20068
Originally posted by COWlan
I have commented on Broadswords posts for some time now but I got tired of posting trying to make him stop his biased and un-informed posts. Do what I do, block him.
.......
Of course there is no such thing as a gov't run by the people in a large country, but each gov't official can be run out of office (i.e. not re-elected) if they do a poor job. And people's public opinion does matter in a democratic republic, as the officials want to get re-elected. With China's government, that does not happen.
As for American media, of course it is biased. But there are a whole bunch of news agencies that have different ideas and different biases....which they express. In China, there is only one media, controlled by the gov't. Big difference.
Originally posted by Odium
China would bomb them till they gave in and only base troops there to stop any form of uprising. Also remember Taiwans force is spread over three islands and they only have 50,000soldiers. It would not need to be anything like D-day/on that scale.
Originally posted by IAF101
Yeah! and the whole world would watch and let the Chinese bomb a democratic state and kill thousands for some vain ideology!!
It would be a repeat of what happened in the Gulf War, the UN declares that china is the aggressor and a coalition is formed with USA leading it, asks china to withdraw in 24hrs- china refuses => USA + allies unleash a wave of aerial and missile strikes all across China. If china retaliates the USA + allies nuke'em and force china to sign some ridiculous treaty and install a democracy. USA will never engage in a land war in Central Asia- thats and unwritten rule the Pentagon obeys!
No, a war with Taiwan would just jepordise their efforts in becomming a modern economic power like those in the west. So I don't think they would go to war knowing that they would lose everything they've worked for in the last 30 years just to satisfy their pride.
Originally posted by Odium
As for America getting involved, I'd say on an economic scale not Military. I doubt they'd want a long war, with China that could cause a lot of lost lives in America.
Originally posted by IAF101
Nobody wants war, if taiwan is attacked they will fight back and the can put up good fight, I am sure the PLA is aware of this. As for an economic embargo America economy is quite widely distributed and with a fall of the chinese economy many other nations would benefit greatly [like India,Russia,Brazil,Indonesia etc] , even local business in the US will benefit . Initally the US economy would be hit but later on it would pick up faster as their would be lesser cheap chinese goods for the local companies to contend with. More over the crude prices across teh world would also come down if the chinese industry collapses. The Chinese would be effected drastically because their economy depends mostly on meeting the demands of the US economy and with that gone it would mean economic collapse!
The chinese are aware of these things and know that to acheive their dream of economic prosperity they would have to make scarifices and the international line for the preservation of democracy in Taiwan.
Originally posted by Odium
So what would matter if it was called a democracy? Either you elect people who lie to you and rule over you or they bi-pass this and save you the time of having a pointless vote.
Originally posted by IAF101You still haven’t understood the meaning of democracy, its not just about casting your vote and let things unfold as they like. The right to hold the government/elected officials accountable, the knowledge that you will get justice even if the accused is an elected official, the ability to voice your dissent/criticize government policy and give people a new view point to any situation that one may feel as unjust are what you can't do in Post-Communism/ Neo- Communism / Pre- Democracy [call it what you will!] China.
Originally posted by rapier28
Look, the issue at stake is not how China isn't a democracy with an accountable government. The fact is we know that, ok.
Originally posted by rapier28
The issue is really how many countries are using this as an excuse to attack China, mainly due to it's rising military and regional power.
It's human nature to get defensive when attacked, therefore these attacks on human rights have only helped to breed a generation of Anti-US Chinese youths who might have otherwise focussed on human rights.
Originally posted by rapier28
The US, Japan, Taiwan have stoked tension un-nessersarily in many areas as almost "baits" in an attempt to disrupt China's growth.
Originally posted by rapier28
Ok, this is essentially the problem for progression of Democracy in China. The US has done more to harm it then to help it. Chinese leaders are now justified to say, "hey, look what happened to the USSR after the US installed democracy".
Originally posted by rapier28
Tell me something IAF, If China was a democracy now with say....
Communist Party: Hu Jintao
Socialist Party: Jiang Zemin
Would you feel better?
Originally posted by Odium
US 21.1%, Hong Kong 17.4%, Japan 13.6%, South Korea 4.6%, Germany 4% (2003) - Don't you think that Europe would easily replace America and Japan for the goods that China sells there?
Originally posted by Odium
I actually have an A2 from Oxford on Contemporary politics at an A grade.
Originally posted by Odium
As for 'Democracy' being all 'great'and 'everyone should have it', actually that's a load of bull. Democratic Governments do more harm then good. Look at America...the debt...unemployment rate...re-offender rates(criminals), yet China has a lower percentage with each one of those and a lot smaller debt.
Originally posted by Odium
US 21.1%, Hong Kong 17.4%, Japan 13.6%, South Korea 4.6%, Germany 4% (2003) - Don't you think that Europe would easily replace America and Japan for the goods that China sells there?
Originally posted by IAF101
Well, if china does attack Taiwan then countries like the USA, Japan, S.Korea would impose sanctions wouldn't they? SO their goes your whole export market. The EU on the other hand is completely self suffecient to a degree, they trade extensively inside the Union[ thats why things are so costly in Europe ] and any outsider dumping of goods would be a very contentious issue! Also the quality of goods sold in the EU has to be of a higher standard than those needed by the US, moreover you just can't change your exports overnight!
Originally posted by Odium
As for 'Democracy' being all 'great'and 'everyone should have it', actually that's a load of bull. Democratic Governments do more harm then good. Look at America...the debt...unemployment rate...re-offender rates(criminals), yet China has a lower percentage with each one of those and a lot smaller debt.
Originally posted by IAF101
Its 'great' to live in a Democracy, every one should have it! Unemployment, external debt are all the products of capitalism and every country has them. People don't mind living poor but people can't live without freedom, they need liberty and equality. Those virtues are more important than money, that’s what people from non democratic countries can't understand because they have never experienced them.
Democracy is never a bad idea, sure it has its problems but on the whole the good outweighs the bad.
BTW check the link you provided China has a higher unemployment rate: 10.1% urban unemployment roughly 10%; substantial unemployment and underemployment in rural areas.
Compared to the USA's rate : 6%
These are official figures and china being communist and all I can't say that I trust their figures.
Originally posted by IAF101
If so many countries are attacking china on this issue then their must be some truth to it! I'm sure denial and thinking that other countries are jealous of its development aren't the answer, that’s just plain paranoia!
China should realize its got problems and then try to solve them instead of living in denial, that’s the way to approach the problem. The Chinese are smart people they should understand that "human rights" is a big deal and their credibility depends on it!
They have problems with all their neighbors don' t they ! Why is that?
Oh right! N.Korea is a pretty a good ally, good company!?
Actually the Russians wanted freedom and Gorbachev tried to appease them but had to finally give into their demands in the end. USA didn't give the Russians their freedom they wanted it and they got it!
I am sure that all the countries that belonged to the Soviet Union are happier now then they had ever been under Soviet rule!
Not really! I would be happy that atleast all the Chinese have a choice on who governs them on the other hand I would be disappointed that the Chinese couldn't get better people from their 1.3B populace to rule them!
Originally posted by Seekerof
Hmmmm.....
Don't know how you got this interpretation, but I am sure that if Chiang Kai-shek was alive today, he would have beat you like there was no tomorrow for twisting and misinterpreting this article.
I highly doubt that Taiwan is "trembling with fear" in regards to China arming.
as posted by Stealth Spy
taiwan are trembling with fear just the way, usa were trembling with fear when the soviets installed missile bases in Cuba
as posted by COWlan
Seekerof, you seem to know very little about nationalists, currently Nationalists are the ones who wish to reunite with mainland and the Pro-Unification side won by a slight majority a few month ago in the vote for parliament/senate (forgot which one is the one that Taiwan has).
The civil war resumed and intensified after the Japanese surrender, and when it ended in the Communist Party of China's favor in 1949, Chiang Kai-shek evacuated the nationalist government to the island province of Taiwan....
Originally posted by Seekerof
as posted by COWlan
Seekerof, you seem to know very little about nationalists, currently Nationalists are the ones who wish to reunite with mainland and the Pro-Unification side won by a slight majority a few month ago in the vote for parliament/senate (forgot which one is the one that Taiwan has).
No, I think I am pretty much on to which Nationalist I refer to, COWlan:
The civil war resumed and intensified after the Japanese surrender, and when it ended in the Communist Party of China's favor in 1949, Chiang Kai-shek evacuated the nationalist government to the island province of Taiwan....
Republic of China
This might help also:
Nationalist Taiwan
You see, the government of Taiwan is Nationalist. Has been and will continue to be. It (Nationalist Taiwan: Republic of China) seeks to unify China and Taiwan, just as China (Communist China: Peoples Republic of China) seeks the same.
The difference is that one wants it done under Communist authority and rule while the other wants it done under Nationalist authority and rule.
seekerof
[edit on 5-3-2005 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by zakattack
US would not loose to china first off US has Way bigger navy with Much better Technology And US has the Largest and Best Airforce while china has alot of airplanes they only have a handful of 3rd and 4th generation fighters that are combat ready, and plus not to mention that while our focus is on Terrorism That if a country does something to Unite the US they best be gettin the # out of the way, not only does the US fight but so do our allies all of the US and all allies would be 20,000+ fighters and bombers not uncluding Navy planes or any planes in reserves 80,000+ tanks and armored Vehicles and about 7.5 million well trained troops, china has alot to loose by pikin a fight with the US however I am in no support of Going to war with anyone.