Donna Brazile and Muriel Bowser were at the hospital @ 4:30 am when Seth Rich was brought in!

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
Hoax bin material

Yes it is.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Someone ought to realize this is stupid nonsense.
Mayor criticizes trump... two days later she's involved in this stale conspiracy theory. Some idiot isn't even smart enough to realize there are records of what occurred in the hospital. Would these ladies have been given access to the O.R.? Ummm no...
And he died on the operating table.
And again two years later?

Gullible doesn't even begin to explain it.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

A Wordpress powered blog? Check your sources and don’t believe everything you read on the internet.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Quarantine: "impose isolation on (a person, animal, or place)." 
A Mayor can't direct the PD to place a possible victim/witness in a shooting into isolation for protection

Why? Why would the mayor be involved at all. Shootings occur every day in DC.
The mayor doesn't get involved.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Maybe maybe maybe.
Maybe the moon is made out of cheese.
Like I keep saying. When confronted with two hypotheses. The one with the fewest assumptions should be chosen.
Maybe this and maybe that is a hell of a lot of assumptions.

a reply to: CynConcepts

No you need to ask why this person is claiming this now.

Look they had nothing to do with this poor man's murder so why don't you guys just can this crap already.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: IAMTAT

Quarantine: "impose isolation on (a person, animal, or place)." 
A Mayor can't direct the PD to place a possible victim/witness in a shooting into isolation for protection

Why? Why would the mayor be involved at all. Shootings occur every day in DC.
The mayor doesn't get involved.

WOW, Silly...
Editing my quote to change the meaning is pretty cheap and low.

Original:

Quarantine: "impose isolation on (a person, animal, or place)." A Mayor can't direct the PD to place a possible victim/witness in a shooting into isolation for protection?

I'm pretty sure the Chief of Police answers to the Mayor.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: Grambler

A) BWAHAHAHA

Collusion isn’t a crime.. collusion is a layman’s term for a traitor.

Breaking campaign finance law is..

Only according to Hannity and Alex Jones..


Plus she reported her every campaign transaction exactly as she was legally required to do..

Which gives the government agencies a chance to vet all your donors if they choose to..


Guess what trump didn’t report that he was legally obligated to???

Almost everything..


He didn’t report getting oppo research from the Russians..

He didn’t report paying off TWO pornstars to be quiet while he ran for office..


One of which he may have paid to have an abortion.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Easy maybe coincidence... maybe someone saw him and they called his co-workers..


Please explain this....


A) If they had something to do with it why would they be ANYWHERE near his hospital????

B) assuming the Clintons/dnc has unlimited money and access to VERY HIGH END mercenaries and security personnel, because they do..

Why did a professional do such a crap job of making it look like an accident/robbery/exc....

If this was done by a hitman we need to think up a whole new reason why they used such a crap hitman..

C) why do riches parents think the conspiracy theory is a joke???

The parents are usually the easiest people to fool if we are adding meaning to the death of their son.

If rich was murdered for outing corruption he is a hero...

If rich was killed in a botched robbery his death was meaningless..

So how bad must the evidence be if the parents think their son’s death was meaningless???

They even sued the Fox News paid for PI for lying and politicizing their son’s death..




All you gotta do to debunk most laughable conspiracy theories is imagaine the logistics required to pull it off..

A) Compartmentalization.

B) It doesn't have to be a professional, hence he was still alive on the way to the hospital.

C) Either Tom is correct about his parents, or the DNC representative assigned to his parents did his job in convincing them he was murdered during a robbery.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Yes we know. You think collusion with foriegn spies and russians is ok as long as you pay for it.

Oh, and Hillary and the DNC lied for over a year about paying for the dossier.

But funny how the gola post change.

We have gone from trump committed treason by colluding with russia to steal the election, to maybe he violated a campaign finance law.

You know, the same thing Obama was fined for doing and no one made a big deal out of.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Love how you're so defensive and mean to people who are looking into a huge possible conspiracy and shouting from the rooftops how dumb it all is. On a conspiracy site. Silly you

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
Seth Rich - Breaking News:

Donna Brazile and Muriel Bowser (DC Mayor) were at the hospital @ 4:30 am when Seth Rich was brought in. Raises the question of when he was shot & how long it took them to get him there.. was there enough time?
No! Holy S__T!

twitter.com...

How could this be explained?

Police were called to the scene and discovered the young man’s body at roughly 4.20am.

off-guardian.org...

Okay so what’s the implications of this?

originally posted by: ausername
a reply to: introvert

Digging in areas that make some people uncomfortable happens in research and investigations.

My apologies for the discomfort. Because many people don't want to go there doesn't mean we shouldn't.

Have a nice day anyway.

Discomfort? Sure.

Whatever cop-out you need to create in order to deflect.

Fact remains that you and many others are creating conspiracies when there is no reason to do so.

Perhaps it is you that is uncomfortable. That is why you use fantasy to create situations that separate you from reality.

Donna Brazile and the Mayor at the hospital when Seth Rich was there? I would say it could not happen but then again that Bill/Loretta meeting happened and if you told me it did I would have said you were lying.

So many tied coincidences and no one on the left wants to investigate but if Trump supposedly took a dump a titty bar in Daytona Beach in 1994 it is headline news.

Seth Rich, as well as Mr Breitbart and Mr Hastings were all victims. To think otherwise is ludicrous. They all had information that could implicate quite a few people.

If you want throw in Scalia...his death was as 'odd' as Mr Foster.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CynConcepts

No you need to ask why this person is claiming this now.

Look they had nothing to do with this poor man's murder so why don't you guys just can this crap already.

Wow! You are getting Silly. Here I am simply questioning, speculating, and even shared earlier that AFM and Matt Couch had a suit filed against them in March for defamation by Aaron Rich. Obviously, Matt Couch is continually digging and seeking evidence so he will not lose in court. Did he discover this through that search?

I have no idea. That is why many have questions for him, Brazile, and even the DC mayor. I would think that all would want to be transparent and assist in finding out the truth.

I certainly don't think Brazile nor the mayor, murdered Seth Rich. Brazile did seem to know Seth and his murder did have an impact on her according to her interviews. I am simply questioning why?

Though they may have had nothing to do with Seth's murder...the question is did they have something to do with deflating the investigation into it? The political climate was quite volatile at that moment after all.

So perhaps, in finding justice for Seth, you should be the one to just 'can' it!

a reply to: Sillyolme

It is propaganda meant for stupid people..

they will literally believe ANYTHING they are told by TPTB..

Even Rich’s parents think it is a joke and is politicizing their son’s death..

How bad must your narrative be if they can’t even convince the grieving parents.. the people most susceptible to having some kinda meaning applied to the death of their child???

a reply to: Grambler

As long as you report it to the proper agencies sure..

It is the law after all..

Now having secret backroom deals with our greatest enemies is OBVIOUSLY layman’s term treason..


That is literally the dictionary definition of being a traitor to your country..


So what does that make his supporters??

What do you call Americans who support someone who betrayed America???

Hmmm???

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Hahahahah!

Yep, so having a 15 minute meeting to hear dirt on an opponent is treason, and all of trumps supporters are supporting treason.

But paying to get dirt on your opponent from a foreign spy, who went to the same russians to get that dirt, then using that dirt and lying about paying it for over a year, thats not treason at all, and people like you that support that are great people!

the mental gymanstics that people engage in to claim their oppoennts engaged in a crime that is punishable by death, but when their side does it it is ok is fascinating to me.

Can you site the law showing don jr.s meeting was treason?

Here is claims that Hillarys team did not disclose their payments for the dossier, which is a crime.

According to the Post, that money was routed from the Clinton campaign and the DNC through the law firm Perkins Coie and described on FEC reports as legal services. The Clinton campaign reportedly paid the law firm nearly $6 million from June 2015 to December 2016, while the DNC paid $3.6 million, though it’s unclear how much money went to Fusion GPS.

Responding to the revelations, Clinton’s former campaign spokesman Brian Fallon compared the project to the kind of “oppo research” that “happens on every campaign.”

But the Campaign Legal Center described the FEC reporting as “misleading.”

“Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are accurately disclosed,” Fischer said. “But describing payments for opposition research as ‘legal services’ is entirely misleading and subverts the reporting requirements.”

www.foxnews.com...

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

I apologize ignore someone else stated this, but just having been in a hospital as my grandmother is experiencing Renal failure, I dunno the protocol, but seems like family should really really only admitted.
Not that this was my case, but...

Even to the point of showing ID.....

Now my question is, what reason did she give at 4:30 a.m.?? Because I’m sure “handler” nor “just here to make sure nothing goes wrong” weren’t her words...

Wonder if hospital video contains audio....

Wonder if, a lot of things........

a reply to: slatesteam

In the US, pretty much anyone can visit in the hospital. The only time there are restrictions is in the case where the patient's health is at risk, in which case they might only let one visitor at a time, or "maybe" immediate family. I have visited in the hospital many times. No one is asked for ID - they do not even ask who you are.