Donna Brazile and Muriel Bowser were at the hospital @ 4:30 am when Seth Rich was brought in!

a reply to: introvert

I did not accuse Brazile of being involved. In fact, it is safe to say I have a great deal of respect for her. After the election, she was one of the few who "came clean." People like her are why the truth prevails over lies. Same with April Ryan from CNN, she spoke out against Omarosa even when she was attacking someone Ryan also dislikes. That is object truth and altruism right there

There are a number of reasons she could've been there, but my focus is primarily on the unsolved murder of Seth Rich. Yes, it is still an unsolved case. I'm not accusing Brazile, or anyone else for that matter. Just saying his death deserves investigation until there is nothing left to investigate (as does anyone's murder)

As to why she was there at 4:30 AM, perhaps that is a question she'd be best suited to answer. Like others have said, without hard evidence all this is is speculation.

a reply to: Grambler

I can appreciate your skepticism. No one yet has all the answers. All I can say is this scenario sounds more realistic to me than Trump somehow convinced the Russian govt to hack the DNC server.

As for your multiple choice, I wish to address one of them.
"2. Similar to scenario one, only here the dnc did not order the death, but wanted someone there to tie up lose ends."

If the DNC did not order the death, they would not know that it was going to occur. How then would they think to station someone at the hospital? So I think that option is eliminated.

originally posted by: ausername
a reply to: introvert

Digging in areas that make some people uncomfortable happens in research and investigations.

My apologies for the discomfort. Because many people don't want to go there doesn't mean we shouldn't.

Have a nice day anyway.

Research is fine and actually expected in this inquiry of SR. How is anyone going to prove those two were at the hospital when FOIA requests for the Bodycam videos of the Police who were first on the scene can't even happen?

The Police could have easily said there were no cams turned on, but I don't think they have ever said that. Seth's Family has even asked the Police to be more forthcoming with information.

If the bodycams were on, they have to be preserved for 65 years in a homicide situation according to what I saw on the Internet as DC regulations.

originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: Grambler

I can appreciate your skepticism. No one yet has all the answers. All I can say is this scenario sounds more realistic to me than Trump somehow convinced the Russian govt to hack the DNC server.

As for your multiple choice, I wish to address one of them.
"2. Similar to scenario one, only here the dnc did not order the death, but wanted someone there to tie up lose ends."

If the DNC did not order the death, they would not know that it was going to occur. How then would they think to station someone at the hospital? So I think that option is eliminated.

Well perhaps they were quickly informed by police, and immediately sent someone out.

This is what I will say about the wikileaks emails.

I have seen exactly the same amount of hard proof that seth rich was the leaker as I have that russia hacked them; that is to say none.

I support investigations into both scenarios, and any other possibilities.

Thats what makes the lack of tranparency and overall fishiness so frustrating.

And lets never forget, for some reason, the FBi did not look at the most important phytsical piece of evidence, the actual server.

So needless to say I am skeptical of the offical narrative.

Though that does not mean I will accept any other theory without concrete proof.

a reply to: JoshuaCox
In respect to C in your post maybe they themselves were threatened into pushing a line that would squash any suspicion of the Clintons and the DNC.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

So how bad must the evidence be if the parents think their son’s death was meaningless???

If it was what I think it was they would be brain dead to not play it as though they thought it was bunk.
Long periods of time can even pass but eventually accidents or suicide happens or to friends and loved ones which is easier.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: Grambler

I can appreciate your skepticism. No one yet has all the answers. All I can say is this scenario sounds more realistic to me than Trump somehow convinced the Russian govt to hack the DNC server.

As for your multiple choice, I wish to address one of them.
"2. Similar to scenario one, only here the dnc did not order the death, but wanted someone there to tie up lose ends."

If the DNC did not order the death, they would not know that it was going to occur. How then would they think to station someone at the hospital? So I think that option is eliminated.

This is what I will say about the wikileaks emails.

I have seen exactly the same amount of hard proof that seth rich was the leaker as I have that russia hacked them; that is to say none.

We DO have a statement from the owner/creator of Wikileaks stating that WL did NOT receive the emails from Russia.

originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Brazille?

Why her though, why would she be sent..

I'm of the opinion Seth Rich was the person who uploaded the data to USB from DNC, sent it to Kim.Com and Kim.Com sent it to Assange.

the DNC found this out, arranged for MS13 hitmen to wack Seth (to stop him leaking more and to send a message) they botched it... Seth was sent to hospital and someone else was sent in to finish him.

But Brazille?... that makes no sense unless she was blackmailed into being there to oversee the execution

Damn good post, my thoughts mirror this exactly.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: toms54
a reply to: Grambler

I can appreciate your skepticism. No one yet has all the answers. All I can say is this scenario sounds more realistic to me than Trump somehow convinced the Russian govt to hack the DNC server.

As for your multiple choice, I wish to address one of them.
"2. Similar to scenario one, only here the dnc did not order the death, but wanted someone there to tie up lose ends."

If the DNC did not order the death, they would not know that it was going to occur. How then would they think to station someone at the hospital? So I think that option is eliminated.

This is what I will say about the wikileaks emails.

I have seen exactly the same amount of hard proof that seth rich was the leaker as I have that russia hacked them; that is to say none.

We DO have a statement from the owner/creator of Wikileaks stating that WL did NOT receive the emails from Russia.

Yes but to me that is no more proof than the intel communities statement saying they know russia hacked it.

Lets see proof from the intel community for their claims, or from assange for his.

I will not merely just take their word as proof.

Correction. They apparently arrived within minutes of his arrival to the hospital, but we're only talking about 15 minutes from when police found him shot in the street.

Hoax bin material

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
Correction. They apparently arrived within minutes of his arrival to the hospital, but we're only talking about 15 minutes from when police found him shot in the street.

So...if they were called about SR being shot...it happened immediately.
Someone should check the drive time between Brazile's house and the hospital.

a reply to: Grambler

I will not merely just take their word as proof.

That is truly what it comes down to

Glad to see so many of us learned our lessons of the Iraq non-existent WMD debacle

a reply to: toms54

Who ever said trump convinced the Russian government into hacking the DNC?!?!

Move the goal post much??


The fact is that Russian agents contacted trump with dirt on his political opponents . Trump Jr. said “he’ll yea”. Then the top 3 people in the trump campaign went to meet with them..

The speculation is in what if anything did trump offer in trade and did he coordinate the release of said emails..


The Russian government could/did hack the DNC for their own reasons.

Using the emails to buy off the trump campaign would have just been icing on the cake.

a reply to: Grambler

Let me know when Seth Rich gets indicted for it.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

We know for a fact that Hillary colluded via a law firm she hired with a foreign spy, who then got dirt on trump from russians. She, unlike the trump admin, used that russian sourced dirt, and it is still being used to smear him to this day.

Yes the russians could hack the dnc for their own reasons. SO could the Israelis, republicans, other democrats, Chinese, french, germans, Palestinians, north koreans, etc. And it is equally likely that disgruntled dnc staffers who were furious at the dnc stealing the primaary from bernie could have released the info.

For some reason, the fbi did not feel it neccessary to look at the server.

But so far, there has been no eveidnce whatsoever released that trump colluded with russia, or even that russia hacked the dnc.

All we have is the intel communities word (the same intel people that leaders all hated trump, and were all wrong about Iraq wmds) that russia did it.

Sorry, we have been fooled before. Lets see proof.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

Let me know when Seth Rich gets indicted for it.

Let me know when when trump gets indicted for colluding with russians.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Well that settles it then. Lol cuz he would never lie right?
He could tell us where he got them couldn't he?
He hates Clinton. If he could prove Rich was the leaker to get her on murder charges he would.
You guys are so naive.
Wikileaks is dead. What have they done lately?

a reply to: Arnie123

Of course they do. You both believe the same conspiracy theories.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

Why didn't this get released two years ago?