It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
Youtube have now also permanently banned his channel.
Personally, I think these platforms can allow or not allow what they want.
I am, however, somewhat suspicious of the coordination here.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Krazysh0t
...yet. But they can refer their so-called definition of hate speech to the law to get people taken away. That is next.
originally posted by: matafuchs
It is not about InfoWars. It is about the action that took place. Do NONE of you defending YouTube see the issue?
Corporations deciding what is right...and wrong...for other to do and produce. This is not simply banning some videos. It is about deciding if what a person is doing is wrong.
Alex Jones is not hurting anyone with his videos.
Alex Jones is not promoting hate.
Yet, the 3 largest social/online media/tech organizations have banned him.
I can access Youtube right now and it is amazing all of the HATE I can find. Sane with Facebook.
A precedent and a slippery slope for sure...
originally posted by: SailorJerry
originally posted by: Saiker
first they came for the weirdo - we supported it.
second they came for conservatives ( claiming they were the ruskies)
third they came for us.
Private companies can do what they want
Jones diatribe is legit hate speech period
originally posted by: SailorJerry
a reply to: matafuchs
I see a free market company making its own decision
Which ia what us conervatives are suppose to support and always do.
And now because its someone they like they don't support it....
Its hypocrisy
Please, define "hate speech". I'm honestly asking.
originally posted by: SailorJerry
originally posted by: Saiker
a reply to: SailorJerry
At what point does a private company become a monopoly over the majority of free speech.
Free speech doesn't cover hate speech and companies have a right to not allow it....
Welcome to the united states, capitalism, and freedom cupcake
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: interupt42
sounds like you want legislation passed that makes the internet a right.
the only way you can force companies to provide hosting, or provide bandwidth, is by making it a right. Or by regulating it as a utility. Which will bring costs affiliated with the bloat that regulates.
Delete them all...
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
Bye bye youtube. I liked it but it's time to boycott them and finally have better platforms. I think I'll keep my account for occasional trolling. We needed this spark people. Divorce is not a pleasant thing but sometimes it's better. Like when your spouse turns to be a fake liberal bitch sleeping with your enemy...or a best friend, whatever.
originally posted by: gernblan
originally posted by: SailorJerry
originally posted by: Saiker
first they came for the weirdo - we supported it.
second they came for conservatives ( claiming they were the ruskies)
third they came for us.
Private companies can do what they want
Jones diatribe is legit hate speech period
Please, give us an example of something he said that is actually "hate speech" (whatever that is).
Thank you.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Krazysh0t
...yet. But they can refer their so-called definition of hate speech to the law to get people taken away. That is next.
So what? It is Apple's service. It is Apple's EULA. They can kick you off their product for whatever they feel like and it is 100% Constitutional no matter how you or I feel about the decision. And no it isn't fascism. It is 100% capitalism.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: Krazysh0t
...yet. But they can refer their so-called definition of hate speech to the law to get people taken away. That is next.
So what? It is Apple's service. It is Apple's EULA. They can kick you off their product for whatever they feel like and it is 100% Constitutional no matter how you or I feel about the decision. And no it isn't fascism. It is 100% capitalism.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: JDmOKI
Quite a loose interpretation you got considering we live in 2018 where term nazi is thrown out like candy.
What does that have to do with anything? Sounds like you are just bitter about conceding a point when you say nonsense statements like this. The term nazi being misused doesn't justify you trying to change the definition of the word to suit the bad narrative you are pushing. Either admit you were wrong or quietly concede that point and move on. The Nazi angle is a BAD angle.
Just stay consistent and I'd agree with you.
I'm not exactly seeking your approval or agreement. So whatevs to this.
originally posted by: gernblan
originally posted by: SailorJerry
originally posted by: Saiker
first they came for the weirdo - we supported it.
second they came for conservatives ( claiming they were the ruskies)
third they came for us.
Private companies can do what they want
Jones diatribe is legit hate speech period
Please, give us an example of something he said that is actually "hate speech" (whatever that is).
Thank you.
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
Bye bye youtube. I liked it but it's time to boycott them and finally have better platforms. I think I'll keep my account for occasional trolling. We needed this spark people. Divorce is not a pleasant thing but sometimes it's better. Like when your spouse turns to be a fake liberal bitch sleeping with your enemy...or a best friend, whatever.