Junior Trump compares the DNC to 1930s Nazis

It was the sillyness of the Trump-Hitler comparison that people laughed at because it had no basis other than the deranged rantings of a few people that were in denial about an election result.

It's not the same thing as a DNC-Nazi party comparison. The DNC is very much like the Nazi party - very similar ideologies.
Extreme left in nature.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Pyle

Okay how about this: which citation isnt true?

Shouldn't be too hard to wrap that analysis up.

Read just the citations. Since we all know the context for which they're arranged those alone tell the story. My words are mere bonus footage.

For one you entire premise is wrong. SJW is a minority of all people. It is barely around campuses of colleges or in communities. Trigger warnings do nothing to people that would not be triggered by the contents (though them being a thing at all seems to trigger people like you). It is like parental discretion before certain shows. You also fail to see that the SJW movement isnt just the left. The right has a whole bunch of the exact same things, INCLUDING ACTUAL #ING NAZIS.

We have one party demonizing and dehumanizing people especially minorities and you are crying that the other party is pushing back and thus that make them the NAZIS?

Which is playing Identity politics those dehumanizing people or those saying we support you?

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Words

No, it just looks like he has been following the left's lead.

So, you blame the left here? For teaching Junior how to act and present himself? What has happened to the conservative mantra of ''self responsiblity''. Is not the president's son also held to these great standards. Personal responsiblity?

So, you're going to cry either way it's spun. Although I like what you did there. Very nice verbal trap.

How was that a verbal trap? I was asking how conservatives seem to hold to a certain standard of behavior and then turn around and negate that standard when they choose to. It's not a trap, it's questioning a level of hypocrisy.

Don't play coy. You were waiting for that post to come up to play that card. In any case, it'll be ok. You'll survive the next 6 years of President Trump, blessed be thy name.

a reply to: Pyle

The Nazi Party started as a minority party too, in a field of 54 political parties (LOL, no joke thats how many they had). They were losing elections, all that, but had enough positions to get their brilliant plan rolling... it was all about infilitration into key junctures (political, academic, media, entertainment, military) of the social structure. See my citations for some key details of that effort, and see the 'Progressive machine' in America described verbatim.

SJW? SJW is the DNC platform. So no true 'minority' there. Its appeal is to minorities, poor, poor minorities. By "minorities" they've brilliantly targeted all of the 'weakest' in the social strata, that is, its made target of the most phsycially strongest of the majority race + gender +sexuality + etc (straight cis white males), because you want to dominate a society well you have to marginalize the portion that is the 'strongest' on paper. Pretty simple arithmetic really... SO you decalre all that is the inverse as claimants on this made up 'Oppression Olympics' as its called, and under this one big fat banner you create an all new MAJORITY. In Game of Thrones season 1, King Robert asks the question "what is stronger, one army or five?" and Cersei answers "I dont know, five.", Robert holding up 5 fingers as he asked, clenches his fingers into a fist and says "ONE, one army with a common cause" (or whatever). SO even though white women are part of that "whiteness", well thats okay we'll need them to take over the world so we'll declare all women part of the victims of white maleness, and gays are a sexual minority we'll declare them, and transgenders are a minority so we'll claim them, and races ethnicity etc are a minority so we get them too, then Islam is a minority religion so we'll claim them... and viola an all new wildly over-compensating MAJORITY. And so goes the "liberal" pretzel logic.

Now that might not seem like a parallel 'Nazi Metric' by which to gauge 'the DNC' (social movement) here, but if you bother to read my thesis on "Hyper-Tribalism" then it'll all make sense:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That truly these "Nu-Nazis" have without any doubt have "out-Nazi'd" the Neo-Nazi's in the the most important 'Nazi Metric" of all: Hyper-Tribalism.

As you see other social movement dominance metrics where the parallels are screamingly obvious, such as propaganda / indoctrination / infiltration methodologies, well any group any where any time could do all that stuff and still not out-Nazi 'whatever other group out there', you see its the scope and style of the identity poltick schema that all the rage in such an analysis. Where in such a contest the Neo-Nazi's would try to make such an appeal, I surmise anyways, but they just dont hold the sway in the public eye, or with the GOP, or in academia, or in the military, or the rest of the 'propaganda industrial complex', the Neo-Nazi's have been out-classed by the Nu-Nazi's in every single 'Nazi Metric', from America to Austria, they just never had a chance. Which I surmise is a daunting, embarrassing mind job for their lot, or at least those in their ranks that truly see things in terms of social movement science.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I know you are not stupid but let me ask you a question.

Why do the DEMS feel they need to be welcoming to minorities?

Identity politics started with the Right and then they did the classic move of blaming their own actions on others. They love to marginalize minorities and people they consider degenerates. They love to blame everything on them. They love to have something to hate. The DEMs say you know what we dont play that way and will work with you and your causes. But some how that is the DEMs playing identity politics.

# off with your BS propaganda.

a reply to: Pyle

Its not just that DNC / SJW/ whatever is "welcoming" to minorities etc, its that they did it via Critical Race Theory / Progressive Stack demagoguery, whereby the cis straight etc etc while males (everyday common white dudes [all of them]) are their oppressors. That we (me, my mom, my grandpa, my buddies, my friends, etc) are their oppressors, that we've been holding them down, and having them murdered by the police, and owe them money and blood.

And that's exactly what the Nazi's did to the Jews.

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss



Identity politics started with the Right

Wait, what?

a reply to: Pyle

"Identity Politics"? Note here I'm not a "conservative", I loath the Republican Party for much longer than the DNC, that I wont excuse them, but I will set insanity and deceptions and ignorance and hypocrisy straight, pragmatically:

The GOP never overtly ran on being white. The GOP never screamed that if someone disagrees with their POTUS its because they're RACIST.

Note I mention those first as most people when they think of OG Nazi's they think sorely in those in your face facade terms.

If you check out my Hyper-Tribalism link above, though, you can see where in 2007 I caught on to the Neocon's using demagogue / mind control method that was straight out of the 'Nazi Method Playbook'. And that it wasnt brazen Nazi technique as they didnt go all in with the race stuff (the ultimate rabble rouser / mind killer), but it was still close enough to the functional methodology to light my hair on fire in those days.

And then around 2010 the DNC busted loose with their "if you're against Obamacare its because YOU'RE A RACIST!" BS and in 2011 the OG SJW's invaded and busted up the Occupy Movement rallies, with the Progressive Stack BS (PS being the latest permutation of Critical Race Theory as was already the gospel in "liberal" academia), and on and on.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Pyle

Its not just that DNC / SJW/ whatever is "welcoming" to minorities etc, its that they did it via Critical Race Theory / Progressive Stack demagoguery, whereby the cis straight etc etc while males (everyday common white dudes [all of them]) are their oppressors. That we (me, my mom, my grandpa, my buddies, my friends, etc) are their oppressors, that we've been holding them down, and having them murdered by the police, and owe them money and blood.

And that's exactly what the Nazi's did to the Jews.

Sorry as a white male I have no problems being affiliated with the DEMS. Maybe its you and not them...

a reply to: Pyle

As long as you prostrate yourself in white guilt, endlessly, and virtue signal in line with everything the MSM / DNC / SJW Brigades say you should, and ideally wear nut tucking capri pants every day (LOL), they'll tolerate you. For now at least (they still need you). But national scale victim bent dehumanization is the recipe for death camps. And although they'd have me amongst the first in such a purge, eventually you'll pass thru the same pens and maybe, just maybe, see where I scratched my name or something into a corner of the wall before they push me into the incinerator.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Pyle

"Identity Politics"? Note here I'm not a "conservative", I loath the Republican Party for much longer than the DNC, that I wont excuse them, but I will set insanity and deceptions and ignorance and hypocrisy straight, pragmatically:

The GOP never overtly ran on being white. The GOP never screamed that if someone disagrees with their POTUS its because they're RACIST.

Note I mention those first as most people when they think of OG Nazi's they think sorely in those in your face facade terms.

If you check out my Hyper-Tribalism link above, though, you can see where in 2007 I caught on to the Neocon's using demagogue / mind control method that was straight out of the 'Nazi Method Playbook'. And that it wasnt brazen Nazi technique as they didnt go all in with the race stuff (the ultimate rabble rouser / mind killer), but it was still close enough to the functional methodology to light my hair on fire in those days.

And then around 2010 the DNC busted loose with their "if you're against Obamacare its because YOU'RE A RACIST!" BS and in 2011 the OG SJW's invaded and busted up the Occupy Movement rallies, with the Progressive Stack BS (PS being the latest permutation of Critical Race Theory as was already the gospel in "liberal" academia), and on and on.

How can you say you hate the GOP but in the same breath say they have not been overtly catering to racists? Did the southern strategy and all the crap the flowed into mainstream GOP because it if not happen or something? Have they not been demonizing and dehumanizing legal and illegal immigrants? Are the liberals and minorities not the enemy of the conservatives these days?

I dont buy the "I hate the GOP" thing you pretend to be are doing. You gleefully over look anything that doesnt conform to you theories.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Pyle

As long as you prostrate yourself in white guilt, endlessly, and virtue signal in line with everything the MSM / DNC / SJW Brigades say you should, and ideally wear nut tucking capri pants every day (LOL), they'll tolerate you. For now at least (they still need you). But national scale victim bent dehumanization is the recipe for death camps. And although they'd have me amongst the first in such a purge, eventually you'll pass thru the same pens and maybe, just maybe, see where I scratched my name or something into a corner of the wall before they push me into the incinerator.

No, its you. I am a blue collar worker that wears jeans and boots everyday. Never have I had a problem with the Democrats. Now conservatives woo boy do they get bent out of shape when they figure out you are not just like them.

a reply to: Pyle

Okay that archaic history has something to it. But not in 'my lifetime'. Never once heard a quote in a position that had any bearing on anything going on as long as I've been old enough for it to matter one way or another. And even back then I believe it was a more anecdotal scale sort of thing, such as, OMG, those food stamp recipients (black women having 6 kids to live off the government teet (which was a major thing no less).

Ante showed me that one 'confession' tape from I forget what his name was.

Yet that at best was an appeal to whites (old Democrats no less I think it was lol), which above you just said is no big deal. This thing I've been harping about hasnt been done, in the US that is, well since the Democrat's did it.

Which is some kind of irony, that yes, to a tunnelvision eye it seems all this new stuff they're on about is making up for their old ways, but to me, I see them reverting to their old patterns. And where their "change" is only as superficial as is the "differences" between SJW's & Neo-Nazi's (that is, opposite things to love / HATE but still the same kind of thinking action methods behaviors etc).

A mere facade grade line of "differences", one which for a while I've been explaining as being of the saem cloth, just torn from patches with different colored stripes. A newer one I've been saying is "a tiger cant change his stripes, but ideologues can change the color of their stripes". The stripes still being the same that is. And that statement when we look at the DNC of old and of new, ouch.

a reply to: Pyle

So you dont spend you online time prostrating yourself to / virtue signalling to DNC / MSN / SJW talking points? I've got two years of observing you that shouts otherwise.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Pyle

Okay that archaic history has something to it. But not in 'my lifetime'. Never once heard a quote in a position that had any bearing on anything going on as long as I've been old enough for it to matter one way or another. And even back then I believe it was a more anecdotal scale sort of thing, such as, OMG, those food stamp recipients (black women having 6 kids to live off the government teet (which was a major thing no less).

Ante showed me that one 'confession' tape from I forget what his name was.

Yet that at best was an appeal to whites (old Democrats no less I think it was lol), which above you just said is no big deal. This thing I've been harping about hasnt been done, in the US that is, well since the Democrat's did it.

Which is some kind of irony, that yes, to a tunnelvision eye it seems all this new stuff they're on about is making up for their old ways, but to me, I see them reverting to their old patterns. And where their "change" is only as superficial as is the "differences" between SJW's & Neo-Nazi's (that is, opposite things to love / HATE but still the same kind of thinking action methods behaviors etc).

A mere facade grade line of "differences", one which for a while I've been explaining as being of the saem cloth, just torn from patches with different colored stripes. A newer one I've been saying is "a tiger cant change his stripes, but ideologues can change the color of their stripes". The stripes still being the same that is. And that statement when we look at the DNC of old and of new, ouch.

Dog-whistle politics

Live and learn.

a reply to: Pyle

If you want to kill it on this topic, I suggest you go and make one of these parallel games:



Where mere conservatism alone has managed to make itself indistinguishable from Neo-Nazi.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Pyle

So you dont spend you online time prostrating yourself to / virtue signalling to DNC / MSN / SJW talking points? I've got two years of observing you that shouts otherwise.

I really doubt you do. I have never tried to hide behind walls of text like you do or straight up lied about my political leanings.

a reply to: Pyle

So people start tearing down DNC / SJW etc like I am here, and you dont turn all white knight and come in to the rescue?

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

wtf the left is calling the national socialist workers party the future of the DNC - so calling them Nazis is not only fair it's accurate.

a reply to: circuitsports

Um, huh?