Former FBI Attorney LISA PAGE is Spilling The Beans and Coming Clean.

a reply to: Lysergic

All in good time my dear... All in good time.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Dems don't care. You guys are trying to prove a conspiracy that doesn't exist.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Hyuk hyuk

You owe me 1k if it doesnt happen by end of term.

a reply to: vinifalou

In the words of Woody Allen
I'd never want to belong to a club that would have someone like me for a member.

I'm here for the cake.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Groucho

a reply to: 3n19m470

No you are failing completely to recognize the threat . Yes just like ISIS terrorists. They poison their own people. As a warning to others to not cross them.
Yes just !like ISIS or any other terrorist regime.
Keep supporting the terrorists. Go team.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: vinifalou

In the words of Woody Allen
I'd never want to belong to a club that would have someone like me for a member.

I'm here for the cake.

Groucho Marx.

But I stopped counting your mistakes a long time ago.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The latest indictment lists four or five different forensic specialist firms that analyzed the data.
But ya know what?? Just keep believing in your little red gefilte fish. Like its an important issue when the data was examined by experts. Like this testimony it's just a distraction from the events that took place that trump and company are so desperately trying to obfuscate by throwing out crap like this.

a reply to: Sillyolme

And, as Groucho also said, "I'd like to join a club and beat you over the head with it."

a reply to: Xtrozero

You're right they are not powerful . They are at risk and that makes them desperate and dangerous. And they have nukes.

a reply to: Sillyolme

You do realize that if the forensic information shows that Russians accessed the emails on Hillary Clinton's server, it is further evidence that her "carelessness" resulted in exposing classified information to foreign nationals?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Your question was irrelevant. I just made it legitimate. Keeping it real so to speak.
Hey I know you guys hate it but I have my own opinions.

a reply to: BlueAjah

The server Clinton used while Secretary of State is not mentioned in the indictment(s), nor is there any indication that it was in use at the time of the theft.

a reply to: 3n19m470

Yes. You should be able to recognize that. It's about a woman. They don't say man. How do we differentiate between those two entities? Oh yeah.. By sex. You made a reference to a woman being a slave to her emotions but if I have to explain it it's already lost on you.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Either way she and the FBI are responsible for this mess.

Not Trump. If you can’t see this is deflection to divert the attention from the real criminals here, then you’re long gone.

You’ll believe anything that the MSM says at this point.

a reply to: 3n19m470

Goodbye. I'm THROUGH with this thread

Yay!

originally posted by: Sillyolme

You're right they are not powerful . They are at risk and that makes them desperate and dangerous. And they have nukes.

So should we sanction the crap out of them ,make them more desperate? Or should we work to ease the tension and move forward with a better relationship...all nukes considering...

At the end it is China that will push world dominance and they could lose 500 million in the process and see it as a win win.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BlueAjah

The server Clinton used while Secretary of State is not mentioned in the indictment(s), nor is there any indication that it was in use at the time of the theft.

Ah ha! I was waiting for someone to make that distinction.
So - we are still left with, how did Wikileaks get Clinton's emails? As of now, it was not the Russians, then?
hmmm

This.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Sillyolme

Media is a powerful tool.

However, considering that social media was used just as much by the political machines of both parties, and considering we freely admitted to election meddling of our own, and not through simply bombing other nations, what's fair is fair. If we can send our own election meddlers off to other countries to try to influence their election outcomes in ways we like, then we is it suddenly to outrageous to think foreign powers might do likewise here?

Or is it only outrageous when the election outcome doesn't go your way?

And this.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04


The DNC maintains there’s a simple answer to this question: According to the group, the FBI never asked to see their servers. But FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee back in January that the FBI did, in fact, issue “multiple requests at different levels” to the DNC to gain direct access to their computer systems and conduct their own forensic analysis.

www.slate.com...