Former FBI Attorney LISA PAGE is Spilling The Beans and Coming Clean.

a reply to: Sillyolme

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CharlesT

They had the content. They didn't need the metal and plastic.

Now what if I can prove to you they did NOT have the content, were never given the data, and were only ever given forensic reports?

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Sillyolme

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CharlesT

They had the content. They didn't need the metal and plastic.

Now what if I can prove to you they did NOT have the content, were never given the data, and were only ever given forensic reports?

A negative is going to be very difficult to prove, especially when it involves the NSA. Trust me, the NSA has had access to all the emails in question.

a reply to: DJW001

That's not what we are discussing. We are discussing the DNC server which the DNC prevented the government from examining. Silly claimed the government did not see the hardware but was given an image of the server to examine. She says that implying it's crazy to think the government did not have access and it's a lie to make such a claim.

So what if I can prove the government did not get an image of the server, did not get any of the data, and relied on the forensic work the DNC themselves had done?

a reply to: carewemust

Yes. I'm sure this is quite significant.
Rolls eyes.

I have no doupt we're going to find out that Page is more of a woman than Strzok is a man.

That Strzok "hearing" was a joke. Any man that can't answer a straight question with a straight answer is a pos and deserves to be treated as such.

Don't get me wrong. Page is a pos also. But at least she seems to be a respectable pos.

Her "lover" seemed a little emotional. Like a child. I don't understand why women are atracted to boys. Probably because they can manipulate them. Meh!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: carewemust

Yes. I'm sure this is quite significant.
Rolls eyes.

Still won't answer my post? What if I can prove you are wrong about them getting an image of the server?

a reply to: ketsuko

Fidelity it seems is only required by the left.
The right gets to indulge AND gets to preach about it!

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: CharlesT

They had the content. They didn't need the metal and plastic.
You understand that the data, the memory within the computer is what they needed right?
And there were several computer forensics labs not just crowd strike that examined the data.
This is another of those it sounds important things that you guys throw out as some kind of defense. But they didn't need the box. They got the data.

The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust

The DNC maintains there’s a simple answer to this question: According to the group, the FBI never asked to see their servers. But FBI Director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee back in January that the FBI did, in fact, issue “multiple requests at different levels” to the DNC to gain direct access to their computer systems and conduct their own forensic analysis.

www.slate.com...

Everything went through Crowdstrike. Everything.

Lol, we can always count on rwnj trolls to rely on secret sources that never materialize.

a reply to: carewemust

What would you guys do if it was discovered that the Mexican government hacked into the I.C.E. computers to leak where all the immigrants are being held. Of course they don't know where some of them are. Or what if they published the agents names and addresses online?
What would you have our government do? Would you believe the story? Would you want trump to act?

a reply to: soundguy

It's worked for CNN for years. You never had a problem with it.

a reply to: Sillyolme

What if The GOP said Mexico did it, and refused to let the FBI have access to the servers, and Trump kept blaming Mexico non stop. Would you find that shady?

a reply to: ketsuko

We must have seen two different hearings.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

choose your path wisely.

So why behind closed doors ?

After that fiasco of American idol Strzok?

originally posted by: neo96
So why behind closed doors ?

After that fiasco of American idol Strzok?

BTW: When is Strzok supposed to receive his Purple Heart from the Democrats?

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: neo96
So why behind closed doors ?

After that fiasco of American idol Strzok?

BTW: When is Strzok supposed to receive his Purple Heart from the Democrats?

www.cnn.com...

a reply to: carewemust

Come back come back. Come back to the real world.
You know that is not what is happening.

a reply to: MysticPearl

Uh huh. Ok.

a reply to: neo96

Wow those Dems sure like not meaning anything they say, don't they?
Like OJ - IF I did it, here's what I did.
"I don't remember typing that text, but if I did, this is what it REALLY meant."
Slime.