It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: Skyfloating
So, Q repeated something already reported, and now the DOJ repeated that same statement, and somehow this is "Future proves past"
this is the "solid proof"?
Britain is in high-level talks with Ecuador in an attempt to remove Julian Assange from its London embassy, where he has been sheltering for more than six years.
Sir Alan Duncan, the Foreign Office minister, is understood to be involved in the diplomatic effort, which comes weeks before a visit to the UK by Lenin Moreno, the new Ecuadorean president, who has called Assange a “hacker”, an “inherited problem” and a “stone in the shoe”. Sources…
originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: Boadicea
I think you're looking for this. I'm a Madsen, Hussein era junky.
www.globalresearch.ca...
Isn't it funny that Hussein 0's mom and pop met at a Russian language class?
Huge issue being, QAnon also makes sure the believers have unquestioned faith in government groups and POTUS - something no one knowing the truth would ever do.
Should QAnon be proven false and we already have things pointing that direction...
... everyone they took onboard will abandon the notions of the great evils we're facing and return to a life of eschewing anything of the sort as a "conspiracy theory".
originally posted by: gottaknow
The problem with QAnon:
For those who cannot watch: Q tells so much of the truth and is actually successful at waking people up. (Something so incredibly difficult to do) Huge issue being, QAnon also makes sure the believers have unquestioned faith in government groups and POTUS - something no one knowing the truth would ever do. Should QAnon be proven false and we already have things pointing that direction, everyone they took onboard will abandon the notions of the great evils we're facing and return to a life of eschewing anything of the sort as a "conspiracy theory".
And a similar analogy could be made with God and free will but you all seem quite weary of the biblical angle so I’ll just let that one be
originally posted by: nowayreally
a reply to: Boadicea
My apologies Boa, your post didn’t load for me before I replied to gottaknow, you said it much more eloquently than I. Lol. Bravo.
IDEA
I'd like some views on whether this would be worthwhile as it would be a LOT of work:
I could create a cross reference index to these threads, in excel, by individual, such that one could look up all posts mentioning, say, Lynn De Forrester Rothschild.
originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: gottaknow
I think that Q is pointing out the system surrounding our govt. rewards corruption. That the system needs changing more than the players. Because the system will always birth new players to leverage their influence.