TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: Skyfloating

Not quite. That same paragraph appears in this DOJ press release dated Feb 16, 2018.

originally posted by: Whereismypassword

Insane theories that Obama was controlled by Iran to deflect away from Trumps Putin visit and his very real Russian puppet strings

Q given up? I’m not surprised after they faked those images

You're too late.
We've already won.
You will be eating government borscht before winter comrade

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

This has already been debunked, why are you still using it?

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork
His Satanism, for starters.

Pic already debunked, as others have said but you do know that it also isn't against the law to be a satanist?

a reply to: daskakik

Patriots: "The constitution says Freedom of Religion, Uphold the constitution"

Patriots: "Ban every Religion except for Christianity"

Like, wouldn't the "constitution" protect a president from being any Religion? or lack of Religion?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Skyfloating

Not quite. That same paragraph appears in this DOJ press release dated Feb 16, 2018.

And now confessed and confirmed by none other than RR...just as predicted. #MAGA.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
And now confessed and confirmed by none other than RR...just as predicted. #MAGA.

How is something made public from RR's office before Q "predicted" it a prediction?

The detractors will not believe guys and gals, let them go, part of 4% who will not accept. Propaganda is effective. WWG1WGA
#SemperFidelis

a reply to: 0311Warrior

Facts are facts.

WWG1WGA is propaganda and it isn't true but that doesn't stop people from posting it over and over like it has some special meaning.

originally posted by: [

How is something made public from RR's office before Q "predicted" it a prediction?

It was predicted that this would be RRs final conclusion as opposed to the dominating MSM narrative.

You acting like this was clear all along is...silly.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
It was predicted that this would be RRs final conclusion as opposed to the dominating MSM narrative.

You acting like this was clear all along is...silly.

It was made clear in the link I posted. It is the exact same text. How much clearer could it have been?

Nunes gets a victory


Access to FBI Docs expanded.

nvm. dont feed trolls.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Not a single one of us in this thread supports banning religions.

It sure looks that way when someone posts that Obama should be tried for "allegedly" wearing a costume with horns because "Satanism".

a reply to: Skyfloating

I didn't point out any one person, just a generalised statement, but, all people talk about is the connection with Q and the Bible, and Trump and the Bible, and how Obama was a Muslim and a Luciferian Satanists, and the left are Satanists etc, so it seems pretty intolerant, and wouldn't be accepted to have a president who was openly any other religion or lack of religion.


"Deplorables got tired of being framed as fascists by the real fascists. "

as you are implying that they are the real fascists, so wouldn't that turnaround and make you the real fascists?

see how it continues

a reply to: Skyfloating

So, Q repeated something already reported, and now the DOJ repeated that same statement, and somehow this is "Future proves past"

this is the "solid proof"?

a reply to: IAMTAT

You can't see the rest of the sleeve to know why that is there. It could be a sleeve protesting hate symbols.
When you assume...

a reply to: IAMTAT

It's a Buddhist swastika, if that makes any difference.

Here`s Kevin Shipp in an interview posted hours ago and his take on everything happening. Q and the Qannons get a mention at the end, Kevin said "the Annons are a wonderful group of people but he is on the fence with Q just because of his nature of suspicion due to his background" @24:45 timestamp.



PS I`m here everyday reading every informative post, my position hasn`t diminished from part 1.

Oh and I have developed a callus on my star clicky finger, thanks.

originally posted by: daskakik


It sure looks that way when someone posts that Obama should be tried for "allegedly" wearing a costume with horns because "Satanism".

My personal position is:

I do not support non-consensual blood drinking, spinal fluid drinking, cannibalism, child abuse and other activities of certain cults.

Call me a moralist, call me old-fashioned, call me narrow-minded, but I stand by those positions and think they are crimes rather than expressions of "religion" or "liberation".

Neither do I support equal rights for rapists. I draw the line at where things are no longer consentual. Freedom of Religion yes, Violence against others, especially children, No.