HOROWITZ and WRAY Interviewed by Senate on 6.18.2018 - What Questions Would YOU Like Answers To?.

LIndsay Graham, the slimey green turd that he is, is really giving them hell on the texts. He stated he wants Wray to reconsider his findings.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Gryphon66

The point is, he repeated when asked today if the case was affected by bias.
The person asking the question wanted a different answer.

Semantics.

He found in the report and today that investigations were not compromised by bias. Again, page vii.

a reply to: CADpro

Distracting from testimony right now I guess. They could not let Trump win and in the rare chance that he did there's an insurance policy in place to take him out.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
LIndsay Graham, the slimey green turd that he is, is really giving them hell on the texts. He stated he wants Wray to reconsider his findings.

Yeah, Graham did a lot of testifying and evangelising.

Wray and Horowitz were merely props for his speech.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
LIndsay Graham, the slimey green turd that he is, is really giving them hell on the texts. He stated he wants Wray to reconsider his findings.

Yeah, Graham did a lot of testifying and evangelising.

Wray and Horowitz were merely props for his speech.

He asked the obvious question that is being ignored: Helping Hillary, in any way, is harming Trump. In a world where we have insurance policies, it seems like there doesn't take much imagination to get from point A to point B.

And since it wasn't spoken to, he did.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I understand exactly what you are saying, my opinion is more wondering how provable Obstruction could be in court based on the evidence so far...

It just popped in my head when Feinstein opened up saying "quote un-quote" then paraphrased...

I also wonder how much of the money and time going to these investigations could go to solving the border crossing children problem...

Is everyone of these Democrats really so dim that they do not see that Trump was saying that the report exonerates him BECAUSE it shows the extreme bias of the investigators, who were also involved in the Russia investigation?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
LIndsay Graham, the slimey green turd that he is, is really giving them hell on the texts. He stated he wants Wray to reconsider his findings.

Yeah, Graham did a lot of testifying and evangelising.

Wray and Horowitz were merely props for his speech.

He asked the obvious question that is being ignored: Helping Hillary, in any way, is harming Trump. In a world where we have insurance policies, it seems like there doesn't take much imagination to get from point A to point B.

And since it wasn't spoken to, he did.

Sure. Too bad nothing the FBI did helped Clinton but a lot of it did harm her campaign.

Getting from point A to B is not always based on a straight line.

originally posted by: CADpro
Is the chic in the white dress a distraction or what? She was playing on cellphone & giggling all the while her dress kept creeping up.

We determined she is today's MSM deflection tactic.


🚬🔫

Hey, just for S&G ... anyone concerned about Rudy Guilliani getting leaks on Clinton from the New York FBI office?

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Is everyone of these Democrats really so dim that they do not see that Trump was saying that the report exonerates him BECAUSE it shows the extreme bias of the investigators, who were also involved in the Russia investigation?

They're not dim at all ... it's obvious that the report doesn't do that in any way shape, form or fashion.

Except to zealots, of course.

Just for the record, I like Chris Wray.

He's doing a great job.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I mean...the agents in charge of that investigation not only talked about how Trump couldn't be allowed to win, they also made sure to talk about how they needed to soft peddle her investigation because she'd be president.

Its a pretty straight line that is worthy at least investigating.

It needs to be a special counsel so McCabe can be compelled to testify under oath.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hey, just for S&G ... anyone concerned about Rudy Guilliani getting leaks on Clinton from the New York FBI office?

Nope.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Is everyone of these Democrats really so dim that they do not see that Trump was saying that the report exonerates him BECAUSE it shows the extreme bias of the investigators, who were also involved in the Russia investigation?

Yes they seem to be following a script.

🤡🚬

Idaho elected a dude named Crapo?!?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hey, just for S&G ... anyone concerned about Rudy Guilliani getting leaks on Clinton from the New York FBI office?

That's for another investigation.

Now nibble.

It could be Damning !!

📙

Good on Horowitz ... just made it clear that the prosecutorial decisions were not made by biased individuals.

Awww ... that shoots down so much of the narrative here.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Hey, just for S&G ... anyone concerned about Rudy Guilliani getting leaks on Clinton from the New York FBI office?

That's for another investigation.

Now nibble.

It could be Damning !!

📙

You need to give that pig in the poke a little air bud.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Is everyone of these Democrats really so dim that they do not see that Trump was saying that the report exonerates him BECAUSE it shows the extreme bias of the investigators, who were also involved in the Russia investigation?

Yes they seem to be following a script.

🤡🚬

Yeah, Hatch couldn't even read his own script.