HOROWITZ and WRAY Interviewed by Senate on 6.18.2018 - What Questions Would YOU Like Answers To?.

First Question would be to ask if the report shown to the public is the report that he submitted.

I would then ask the IG to read back the Storzk texts, and ask him how what he read shows no political bias....

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SonOfThor

You can tell that Feinstein's conscience is loaded with guilt over past atrocities.

Isn't Feinstein the one who leaked an entire classified testimony/transcript earlier in the year....and it back-fired?

Hypocrite.

People forget.

💫

That was Feinstein's excuse for leaking the transcript wasn't it? A bad cold on her brain.

Horowitz just said their findings do not mean that they support every decision of the investigation.

And he is pretty much slamming those involved in the investigation.

H saying many decisions were made by prosecutors.

There lies some problems.

😎

originally posted by: BlueAjah
Horowitz just said their findings do not mean that they support every decision of the investigation.

Which should indicate that loads of info was never uncovered and/or loads of info was withheld.

😎⚖

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: SonOfThor

You can tell that Feinstein's conscience is loaded with guilt over past atrocities.

Isn't Feinstein the one who leaked an entire classified testimony/transcript earlier in the year....and it back-fired?

Hypocrite.

People forget.

That was Feinstein's excuse for leaking the transcript wasn't it? A bad cold on her brain.

Yeah as I remember, that was the "reason" 😃

originally posted by: BrennanHuff
I would then ask the IG to read back the Storzk texts, and ask him how what he read shows no political bias....

Indeed. I would read back all the instances of bias that the report highlights, and then pointedly ask Horowitz if that was actually what he concluded in the report he sent to Rosenstein? And if so, in what possible universe could he locally conclude that no political bias was present?

My question would be, who is the lady in white giving a free show to?

Anybody know how many people involved in the IG investigation.

Could be bad apples inside.

🔑

originally posted by: Muninn
My question would be, who is the lady in white giving a free show to?

She's the MSM decoy for today.

🚬🤷

Wray is saying that mistakes were made, there were poor decisions, etc.
And people will be held accountable.

a reply to: xuenchen

She must be reading ats cause she corrected the issue.

Grassley citing some double standards.

😃⚖

Sure seems like there were a lot of limitations to this investigation ... which makes it really not a very thorough one ! More like just a scratch on the surface ....

H just said they couldn't get warrants for some peoples' personal devices because he doesn't have the authority !!

There were suspected classified stuff on those devices.

Another big problem.

And, I bet the redacted parts have some serious "recommendations".

big🚬🔫's

originally posted by: MetalThunder
Sure seems like there were a lot of limitations to this investigation ... which makes it really not a very thorough one ! More like just a scratch on the surface ....

I think there's lots of recommendations in the redacted parts of the report.

⚖

Good.
Horowitz says they still are investigating the leaks.
This is not the end of this.

a reply to: xuenchen

Is that regard we have a big week coming up

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: xuenchen

Is that regard we have a big week coming up

Possibly.

Now it looks like Comey IS under investigation.

Neither H or W can "confirm or deny" 😃🔑💥

The Democrats keep changing the subject.
They are trying to distract from the IG report.