-@TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -8-

DECODES of Q Post 1666 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub...


GUCCIFER/FLORIDA Method
KEYLETTER = "q"
RESULT = "/it Ung"
INTERPRETATION = I see "Slash it"(knife?) and "Young"... may refer to something multimedia on the server...nuff said

KEYLETTER = "Q"
RESULT = "te2n-rjaprvlmra/uAmr[h"
INTERPRETATION = "te2n" could refer again t Titan Energy, LLC (TTEN) that Xuenchen highlighted from a previous decode?
but it could also mean "Titan Tire co. (Titan Steel workers)" which was an appeal court case about whether union reps should be paid fulltime salaries by companies with judge F.J. Kapala presiding!
Titan Steelworkers judgement pdf
RJ=Retired Justice?, "aprv"=approved, "LMRA"= Labor Management Relations Act, U=you, AMR=Acadamey of Management review (or Appropriate Management response/Annual Monitoring Report?)
"[H" - may mean one side of locking Hillary in the "killbox"?

TIMESTAMP TO ACRONYM
Method 1 = use both digits in each of hour, minute, seconds and apply Modulo 26 to get A to Z letters
Result = "@@R"
Interpretation = aimed at Renegade? Or Rod Rosenstein?

Method 2 = add digits in each of hour, minute, seconds as appropriate to get A to Z letters
Result = "FG"
Interpretation = Fighter Group, or Focus Group, or Field Goal

COVFEFE Method not applied as timestamps hours creates a 0 column square

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Yes of course. How many Qs is the question. Oh and their position in the Whitehouse which is the part I'm talking about not existing. That Q is a larper having a lot of chuckles at a lot of people's expense goes without question.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's a lie Andy. i never really expected you to offer any proof. Christopheir Steel is not a ghost writer. No one has disproved any portion of the dossier. You won't find any proof of your claim no matter how long you look. So don't waste your time.

a reply to: crankyoldman

Five as in roman numeral "V"? As in cup/chalice/female?

a reply to: dashen

The way I see it is if they're in this thread they're not in the serious threads. That's fine with me. But that doesnt stop me from asking for some proof every now and then.
So far all I get are be!iefs. No supporting data.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Well then I guess the True Believers are going to have to come up with some verifiable data

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Five as in roman numeral "V"? As in cup/chalice/female?

I thought more as a Masonic Star.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Five as in roman numeral "V"? As in cup/chalice/female?

Your Queen

Why do they word it "Any past non-violent crime"? That seems to imply there were violent crimes he might have been charged with.

Only violent cases I know of in this tale is....?

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: queenofswords

I wish... but just did a check on that anagram and it's a lil far from a match:

2nd line for each name shows letters that are NOT in the other name.

Mary Tod Lincoln
d

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Hil a R h

lol....I was going by last year's game with names we were playing. I had to go dig up my notebook to see what we had found.

What I found was not an exact anagram, but a variation of the anagram game. Mary Tod(d) Lincoln's name is found within Hillary Rodham Clinton's name except for the second 'd', but if you include Hillary's middle name initial (Diane), there it is.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

It's a lie Andy. i never really expected you to offer any proof. Christopheir Steel is not a ghost writer. No one has disproved any portion of the dossier. You won't find any proof of your claim no matter how long you look. So don't waste your time.

No one has disproved it? No one have PROVEN it! Not one iota! It’s hard to disprove something that didn’t happen. All he can say is I didn’t do it. How do you provide evidence that you did not do something? Can he prove he didn’t piss on those prosties? How do you prove something like that? Please tell me, because that’s not how it works. The defense in a trial doesn’t have to prove their innocence. It’s the prosecutions job to prove their guilt.

originally posted by: MetalThunder
Waterview tunnel ..... New zealand ... what was the tunnel boring machines name? Alice - coincidence ?

New Zealand Transport Agency

Q Mastercard is available - It's more than just a card

Again New Zealand

I'm sure it's just another load of coincidences...

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan

originally posted by: pavil
What's NZ's part in all of this.

Probably the same as the UK's role: laundering the dirt that the DNC provided them, so it they could pretend it was legitimate intelligence from foreign sources.

We know now that the Steele dossier ultimately came from anti-Trumpers. Chris Steele was just a ghost writer paid to repackage it as something that looked official.

Andy, Remember, McCain initiated the doss work on behalf of the repubs, then when it failed, they handed it over to the dems. Both sides wanted him out...

Cohen never went to prague
Deconstructionism works both ways, though it is a stupid game.

originally posted by: queenofswords

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: queenofswords

I wish... but just did a check on that anagram and it's a lil far from a match:

2nd line for each name shows letters that are NOT in the other name.

Mary Tod Lincoln
d

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Hil a R h

lol....I was going by last year's game with names we were playing. I had to go dig up my notebook to see what we had found.

What I found was not an exact anagram, but a variation of the anagram game. Mary Tod(d) Lincoln's name is found within Hillary Rodham Clinton's name except for the second 'd', but if you include Hillary's middle name initial (Diane), there it is.

QOS,

There is an estoteric notion that there is a link (we'll leave it at that) between DJT, JFK and AL. It is also been said that MTL whacked her hubby in a pre CIA CIA effort, and that JK might have done the same in a CIA effort. Just tossing it in if Q fails to detail it cause it is the past not the now.

a reply to: eisegesis

OK buddy.

a reply to: Sillyolme

It sure is a free website for anyone's opinion, including yours.

Mine is that you haven't spent an hour looking at the drops yet you're here trying, and failing, to debunk Q, as you usually do in all subjects that goes against your thinking.

I'm still waiting for your response on the tarmac meeting, btw.

Or you'll just move along to a different subject as usual?

a reply to: LurkNoMore

Do you think someone is calling you because of your posts made in this thread?

originally posted by: eisegesis

Can anyone claim they have done that?

Exactly.

Makes it pretty hard to call someone out for that, when nobody knows.

a reply to: vinifalou

Expand please, rather than a throwaway comment.

You clearly don't believe this is just a coincidence... so what do you think it means?

So many people hide behind throw-away mystic comments "hmmmmm"... never any explanation. Its all just hot air.

Time to change that... expand and tell me what you think this means.