It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: face23785
You're wasting your time. I once had a truther claim that the reason you can't hear explosions on any of the videos of the buildings collapsing is because the buildings collapsing is too loud.
Because apparently the explosions that are supposedly causing the building to collapse didn't begin until after the building started collapsing and generating that noise that makes it impossible to hear the explosions?
These people have no brain.
Is anyone that questions the official narrative a "truther" and do they all "have no brain" ?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: face23785
You're wasting your time. I once had a truther claim that the reason you can't hear explosions on any of the videos of the buildings collapsing is because the buildings collapsing is too loud.
Because apparently the explosions that are supposedly causing the building to collapse didn't begin until after the building started collapsing and generating that noise that makes it impossible to hear the explosions?
These people have no brain.
Is anyone that questions the official narrative a "truther" and do they all "have no brain" ?
Anyone who thinks an explosion can't be heard because an event that the explosion supposedly caused is too loud has no brain.
Defensive much?
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: face23785
You're wasting your time. I once had a truther claim that the reason you can't hear explosions on any of the videos of the buildings collapsing is because the buildings collapsing is too loud.
Because apparently the explosions that are supposedly causing the building to collapse didn't begin until after the building started collapsing and generating that noise that makes it impossible to hear the explosions?
These people have no brain.
Is anyone that questions the official narrative a "truther" and do they all "have no brain" ?
Anyone who thinks an explosion can't be heard because an event that the explosion supposedly caused is too loud has no brain.
Defensive much?
No. You said "a truther once told you" and "these people have no brain
Your backtracking and now say THAT specific person, truther or not, has no brain?
Straighten your tongue. It was a simple question.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: face23785
You're wasting your time. I once had a truther claim that the reason you can't hear explosions on any of the videos of the buildings collapsing is because the buildings collapsing is too loud.
Because apparently the explosions that are supposedly causing the building to collapse didn't begin until after the building started collapsing and generating that noise that makes it impossible to hear the explosions?
These people have no brain.
Is anyone that questions the official narrative a "truther" and do they all "have no brain" ?
Anyone who thinks an explosion can't be heard because an event that the explosion supposedly caused is too loud has no brain.
Defensive much?
No. You said "a truther once told you" and "these people have no brain
Your backtracking and now say THAT specific person, truther or not, has no brain?
Straighten your tongue. It was a simple question.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MALBOSIA
You cannot cite evidence, then that is faith. Faith is religion. There is no proof of CD at WTC 7, then there is only faith. Belief in CD at WTC 7 is a religion by definition. Unless you can create a logical argument on the physics of explosives with enough force to cut WTC 7 structural steel.
The claim by the truth movement, the resistance of each floor had to be removed. WTC 7 was around 47 stories tall. Take in account the tall ground floor? Still should be at least 30 sets of exsplosions easily overheard. And the complex CD system that supposedly had to remove the resistance of each floor had to survive building damage and wide spread fires?
WTC 7 CD is a false narrative.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Please start with explaining why there is evidence to believe WTC 7 was brought down by demolitions, not by building damage/fire/thermal stress/inadequate fire insulation?
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Please start with explaining why there is evidence to believe WTC 7 was brought down by demolitions, not by building damage/fire/thermal stress/inadequate fire insulation?
There is no better theory for me to accept than the fire, stress, blah blah theory.
I am curious why it would be so difficult to recreate, even with a visual simulation.