It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
It's ironic that you call anyone that questions a narrative a "conspiracist" and accuse them of name-calling.
Then you on to describe your theory as a matter of fact.
Priceless
Then cite evidence of CD at the WTC 7. Then state a credible theory with evidence to supersede impact/fire/thermal stress damage. Or will you choose to rant instead?
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Funny conspiracists never talk about the other WTC 7 studies. Studies as sworn deposition?
By: benthamitemetric
www.metabunk.org...
Thread: ae911-truths-wtc7-evaluation-computer-modelling-project.t5627/page-31
www.metabunk.org...
Each of the the NIST, Arup, and WAI studies were conducted by multiple PhDs with expertise in forensic engineering, tall building engineering or fire science, and the NIST WTC7 report was also independently peer reviewed by the Journal of Structural Engineering (whose editors and peer reviewers have similar levels of expertise), while not a single expert on forensic engineering, tall building engineering or fire science worked on Hulsey's study.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
a reply to: neutronflux
Ok Ok, just calm down.
Do you believe the video above depicts a silote of what occurred to bring down wtc7?
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Sorry there is no proof of CD at WTC 7. If it wasn’t demolitions, and you think fire related collapse is BS ( which is contradicted by at least three studies), then state what caused WTC 7 to collapse.
I personally think it very much has to do with building damage, fire, thermal stress, being built over the electrical substation, the WTC fire insulation found deficient by per 9/11 studies, the floor connection angles of WTC 7 that were not common practice, and the minimization of concrete to reduce cost beyond common practice.
Ok. You have established that.
Is this a good visualization of how the building came apart?
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
a reply to: neutronflux
You never commented on the video I posted.
How come you let Mrthumpy answer for you?
ETA:
I ask you this because Mrhumpy posted a cherry picked 1 second loop and is making you look like an idiot.
Are you going take that dry?
originally posted by: neutronflux
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
a reply to: neutronflux
You never commented on the video I posted.
How come you let Mrthumpy answer for you?
ETA:
I ask you this because Mrhumpy posted a cherry picked 1 second loop and is making you look like an idiot.
Are you going take that dry?
The collapse started in the interior. It was progressive from east to west as indicated by the large structures on WTC 7’s roof. The items on the roof shows the interior of WTC 7 failed. Only after the interior of WTC 7 could not hold up the facade did the facade fall.
originally posted by: face23785
You're wasting your time. I once had a truther claim that the reason you can't hear explosions on any of the videos of the buildings collapsing is because the buildings collapsing is too loud.
Because apparently the explosions that are supposedly causing the building to collapse didn't begin until after the building started collapsing and generating that noise that makes it impossible to hear the explosions?
These people have no brain.