Why the Western Male is Being Dumped and collectively character assassinated.

Uhh no you’re not under attack.

Do you know how many white males dominate our culture in entertainment/media?

a reply to: YungMahn

Do you know that 70+% of the overall population is still more or less white or identifies that way? So that would make sense.

originally posted by: aethertek
a reply to: JDmOKI

if they keep doing this and targeting white men they will have a white identity movement.

Where have you been, the "movement" already exists, has had their pathetic displays & have managed to murder more innocents for their "cause".

K~

where have you been? The kkk was dying a painful and glorious death until identity politics took over the left. The left needed an enemy and they decided straight white males had to be targeted as the reason for all the problems of the world. The new white nationalist movement is a direct result of the progressive movement. this is basically the horseshoe effect and i hate both of them equally.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: badw0lf

Because two wrongs always make things right?

I seem to have learned that old chestnut somewhere.

Two wongs do not make a white.

You'll never find a thread on ATS that could wedge that pun into a post, with a semblance of legitimacy. lol

Besides, it's not wrong if a white guy is punished for things he had no part in, no control over, and no ability to halt. It's social justice. All the warriors are doing it these days!

I personally self flagellate so much waiting for my lot, that I need some new razor chain.

a reply to: badw0lf



The only proper place for the white male in leftist orthodoxy with the Christian religious trappings removed, of course.

With the sharp demographic decline in the West, the western man is on the road to extinction. The western man has put both his testosterone and manhood in a chastity belt.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

No you’re just oddly insecure

a reply to: YungMahn

No it is a statistical reality. Most Western societies are below replacement point. Why else do you think Europe opened its doors to a flood of refugees? It was not out of compassion. It was out of a desire to attempt to avert economic catastrophe. Most social welfare states are a ponzi scheme that rely on each new generation being larger than the one that preceded it, but when each couple has less than two children on average ... that changes and populations shrink along with the tax bases needed to pay for a rapidly aging and ailing population.

The refugee flood was an effort to replace tax base rather seek real solutions to that problem.

Culture always lags behind technology. As culture begins to catch up, the same phenomena of demographics will start to be observed in all those other cultures too. Western societies are not unique, they're just among the first. If you need more proof, just look at some of the Asian societies like Japan. They show the same demographic trends and have the same problems.

a reply to: ketsuko

Agreed, modern societies that rely on technology tend to have a decline in population growth and Japan is a great example of that trend. Germany didn't show compassion letting refugees into their countries it was basically a desperate need for a working class population like in the USA. People wonder why after 30+ years we still haven't solved illegal immigration and its because our politicians let it happen.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

If you really believe this, then maybe people shouldn't use condoms, birth control pills, or have abortions? Or intentionally limit the sizes of their families?

Do something about the cost of living and the cost of raising children here, so that both parents don't need to work just for the family to survive. Then people can afford to have more children and the birthrates will increase.

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

If you really believe this, then maybe people shouldn't use condoms, birth control pills, or have abortions? Or intentionally limit the sizes of their families?

Do something about the cost of living and the cost of raising children here, so that both parents don't need to work just for the family to survive. Then people can afford to have more children and the birthrates will increase.

But wouldn't that increase the birth rates of the "wrong" kind of westerners?

Don't let the code word "westerners" obfuscate what they really mean by that in this thread.

a reply to: ketsuko

Good post, I'll support:



From: www.visualcapitalist.com...

a reply to: Abysha

Don't let the code word "westerners" obfuscate what they really mean by that in this thread.

"Western culture, sometimes equated with Western civilization, Western lifestyle or European civilization, is a term used very broadly to refer to a heritage of social norms, ethical values, traditional customs, belief systems, political systems, and specific artifacts and technologies that have some origin"

"Living in or originating from the West, in particular Europe or the United States.

‘Western society’"

en.oxforddictionaries.com...

a reply to: Abysha

Thing is that historically immigration patterns were somewhat organic, nations suffered catastrophes and that forced people to emigrate to more opportunistic economies. But the problems we face now are more created by social system failures, for example wars or economic reasons.

In general you want immigrants with good skill sets and with good work ethics, that helps build economies. But most western and European governments are ensconced in welfare problems with unsustainable debt loads so they offer welfare to attract immigrants instead of productive people.

originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: Revolution9

The white males are the ones throughout history who have BEEN the oppressors, that's how come they aren't usually oppressed. That also happens to be the reason that they SEEM to be under attack, it is simply because many regular folks want all races and genders to have an equal chance.

Note that it is not white men who are under attack for the most part, but it is the aspect of white men suppressing others that is under attack. Some white men perceive this as a threat as they are used to getting gains by suppressing others, such as women today, homosexuals today, and other races both now and in the past (but much more in the past). If they are religious, they wish to suppress others who have different viewpoints than theirs instead of just focusing on their own views and how they apply to their own lives.

The goal is for the white man to be equal, and not a suppressor. That is basically it. For someone who is used to oppressing or suppressing others for personal gains, such as historically, white slave owners, or today, possibly a white man (and presumably other men as well) enjoying massive income inequality over women in the workforce, it does seem threatening to lose that ability to abuse power.

So this post is completely okay but my post the other day essentially saying the same thing about the black race, in reverse, gets knocked out.


I think this is a PERFECT EXAMPLE of the double staqndard present even on this site!

a reply to: Abysha

Crap!

I meant to say that if he really believed that, then "Westerners" should stop using condoms & birth control pills; should stop having abortions; and should stop intentionally limiting the sizes of their families. And "Westerners" should work to lower the cost of living in their cities, so that both "Western" parents won't have to work just for their families to survive. Then, maybe more "Western" people could afford to have more kids, which would increase "Western" birthrates.

a reply to: JDmOKI

You're absolutely correct. However, you might want to reread the OP and a lot of the posts in this thread. By the real definition that you quoted, I'm also a Westerner. But look at the OP and tell me which "Westerners" he's talking about.

originally posted by: JDmOKI
a reply to: Abysha

Don't let the code word "westerners" obfuscate what they really mean by that in this thread.

"Western culture, sometimes equated with Western civilization, Western lifestyle or European civilization, is a term used very broadly to refer to a heritage of social norms, ethical values, traditional customs, belief systems, political systems, and specific artifacts and technologies that have some origin"

"Living in or originating from the West, in particular Europe or the United States.

‘Western society’"

en.oxforddictionaries.com...

Lol. If westerners look different in 50 years, that doesn't make them less "western". Do you think your locked-in-time version is the only version of western society that has existed? The west is as the west does. I understand western civilization, almost majored in it (sexuality in 20th century western civilization), and find it anything but static.

But that's what this is really about. People afraid of western society looking different than themselves.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Yes, well, there is a poisonous undercurrent in our culture now that gets very upset when you do have multiple kids.

www.usmagazine.com...

Having children is destructive the planet, don't you see? There are too many people in the world. That's the cultural line of thought, and as long as people are actively being taught that, having multiple children when you could afford them and care for them is culturally frowned upon.

So it's more than just economic pressures and those other things you state.

Having kids of bad.

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

If you really believe this, then maybe people shouldn't use condoms, birth control pills, or have abortions? Or intentionally limit the sizes of their families?

Do something about the cost of living and the cost of raising children here, so that both parents don't need to work just for the family to survive. Then people can afford to have more children and the birthrates will increase.

It’s just a fact. I’m not advocating that people have more children, just that other civilizations are having a lot more of them.