It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bulwarkz
what do you mean, try again.
This system that is corrupt is your champion. F yeah we will try again. This 100 year experiment failed us all.
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Nothin
In my case 4 years studying economics and about twenty years working in financial service is my source.
It's s wide subject but will happily answer any questions and try and provide a source to any specific queries.
That's very generous of you. Thanks!
Do you see any potential, or viable alternatives, to having privately-controlled central banks?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ScepticScot
Your source is an advert for buying gold.
Figures.
Once I reclaim my ALL CAPS birth certificate I'm using that money to buy gold.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Nothin
Don't have a solution to propose, and don't have details to be focused-on and picked-apart.
Gotcha. It's more of a rant then.
Do we have a problem with some entities profiting from the sweat of another, or not?
Not enough detail. Who are the 'entities' profiting? What is the method of their profit? Are the people they are profiting from being compensated in any manner?
so as far as knowing our economic history i can assume keynesian economics was a rich mans ruse. You know, based upon debt now being registered in the trillions. All you smart and educated economist Keynes champions. Please tell me the plan to pay off trillions of debt. Iceland provides the answer, the only answer.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Realtruth
Fiat currency and fractional reserve banking are completely separate things. You can have both together or either one without the other.
It's a good idea to have a basic understanding of economics, finance and history before believing every crack pot theory bout the federal reserve.
no, i am not complaining. I am pointing to facts and options. Unless you feel that it is complaing about parasites.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Nothin
Because the entire thread is people complaining, conflating and confusing fiat currency vis a vis the Federal Reserve with their poor wages or station in life.
So which is why I asked; if this system doesn't work what do you want to replace it with? Answer: crickets chirping.
originally posted by: bulwarkz
no, i am not complaining. I am pointing to facts and options. Unless you feel that it is complaing about parasites.
originally posted by: Plotus
You are correct, but no time for three odd hours of youtube videos.
My thoughts are, convert to Real Estate or some other Real property. Gold, Silver, Copper, Platinum, Exotic Cars
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Nothin
In my case 4 years studying economics and about twenty years working in financial service is my source.
It's s wide subject but will happily answer any questions and try and provide a source to any specific queries.
That's very generous of you. Thanks!
Do you see any potential, or viable alternatives, to having privately-controlled central banks?
Most central banks aren't privately controlled. Even the US Federal reserve, despite its convoluted structure, is effectively a part of the federal government.
You are either ignorant to fiat money vs. Real money or you are playing word games trying to act deceptive. I am not underpaid. I just do not think your typedeserves higher wages for what you do if it comes at the expense of the workers and producers. Money magic and material worship is not my thing. I do no have a job, a boss. But i work my ass off every day. I go to bed tired and wake up everyday the moment the sun peeks at the horizen with but a hint of light. Because i cannot wait to start each day. I try not to lie cheat or steal. I feel good and love my life as I have learned to be content with both plenty and scarcity and trouble.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: bulwarkz
what do you mean, try again.
Try again as in your facts are not correct. Public/private banking existed at the nation's founding and was not a new concept when the Federal Reserve was created.
This system that is corrupt is your champion. F yeah we will try again. This 100 year experiment failed us all.
All you basically have done is groused that you're underpaid. Sounds like the issue isn't the Federal Reserve but you.
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Nothin
In my case 4 years studying economics and about twenty years working in financial service is my source.
It's s wide subject but will happily answer any questions and try and provide a source to any specific queries.
That's very generous of you. Thanks!
Do you see any potential, or viable alternatives, to having privately-controlled central banks?
Most central banks aren't privately controlled. Even the US Federal reserve, despite its convoluted structure, is effectively a part of the federal government.
Where do the profits from interest go?
Mostly to the government, with some being skimmed off into private hands?
What: if any, control, does the USA government have over the US Federal reserve?
Can the US Federal reserve be altered?
Who signs the paychecks, for US Federal reserve employees?
originally posted by: bulwarkz
You are either ignorant to fiat money vs. Real money or you are playing word games trying to act deceptive.
I am not underpaid. I just do not think your typedeserves higher wages for what you do if it comes at the expense of the workers and producers.
I think our biggest problem is we are suffocated by the sociopaths that believe stealing our wages for themselves means they earned it.
Fairwage not money magic.
Currency should only be used for exchange of goods and services.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Nothin
In my case 4 years studying economics and about twenty years working in financial service is my source.
It's s wide subject but will happily answer any questions and try and provide a source to any specific queries.
That's very generous of you. Thanks!
Do you see any potential, or viable alternatives, to having privately-controlled central banks?
Most central banks aren't privately controlled. Even the US Federal reserve, despite its convoluted structure, is effectively a part of the federal government.
Where do the profits from interest go?
Mostly to the government, with some being skimmed off into private hands?
What: if any, control, does the USA government have over the US Federal reserve?
Can the US Federal reserve be altered?
Who signs the paychecks, for US Federal reserve employees?
Almost all profit goes to the government. The rest goes to the federal reserve member banks.
The federal has in theory operational independence which means it is told what to do but not how. In reality as it's power comes from Congress it effectively reports into the federal government.
No idea who signs the paychecks (Are they still a thing in the US?). I would assume the member banks.
complete BS. The fed bought up all the bad commer ial real estate with brand new printed digital clicks and screen entries. And now they are selling it off to foreign entities. You do not (the public trust) get the paper or do you see the debt decline. You play the fool with that logic. I am not impressed with empty claims. Address the trillions in debt. If you have no plan nor answer you all lose the argument. Why?
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: bulwarkz
You know the biggest group of holders of US debt (after the federal government itself) is the US public. The debt is private sector savings.
The debt is just a mechanic of money creation in the US and is not in anyway comparable to private debt. No one really loans the US government money, how could they when it's the US Government that creates the money in the first place.
The US could transfer it's entire debt to federal reserve accounts and pay higher interest on that instead. The net effect would be the same but people would stop obsessing about how much debt the US has.