Roy Moore's accuser has admitted to faking the yearbook.

a reply to: face23785

There's no law about what age someone has to be to call them beautiful. How many times do we hear adults refer to children as beautiful, etc?

No there isn't, but most adults who call children beautiful probably aren't wanting to get in the child's pants or date them.

That's the difference.

a reply to: face23785

So he is just a creepy law a Biden citizen?

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

There's no law about what age someone has to be to call them beautiful. How many times do we hear adults refer to children as beautiful, etc?

No there isn't, but most adults who call children beautiful probably aren't wanting to get in the child's pants or date them.

That's the difference.

My point is nothing about what he supposedly wrote suggests that. The only thing that makes it seem that way is the rest of her story. What he wrote is being presented as proof of that. It's a circular argument. The inscription in and of itself doesn't prove he did anything inappropriate. If that's all they have they have nothing. And now their honesty is in question.

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: face23785

So he is just a creepy law a Biden citizen?

Apparently.

That #in guy...

a reply to: face23785

My point is nothing about what he supposedly wrote suggests that. The only thing that makes it seem that way is the rest of her story.

The words themselves don't, no. But not what several others have also said that confirms a pattern of behavior?

Sure.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

My point is nothing about what he supposedly wrote suggests that. The only thing that makes it seem that way is the rest of her story.

The words themselves don't, no. But not what several others have also said that confirms a pattern of behavior?

Sure.

My observations were strictly about this case.

a reply to: Justoneman

Honestly I don't know that anything has changed except the circumstances surrounding it. It's used to be for practicality at least to the woman and her parents, due to many variables. The job market for woman being bunk and more communal/farming lifestyles for example.

I have seen quite a few articles imploring understanding for pedophilia. I forget the group associated, but there was another I read that suggested kids fight for their right to own their sexuality, that their parents hold no legal guardianship to their sexual encounters. This is also being pushed from a different angle as can be seen with children transitions

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

My point is nothing about what he supposedly wrote suggests that. The only thing that makes it seem that way is the rest of her story.

The words themselves don't, no. But not what several others have also said that confirms a pattern of behavior?

Sure.

My observations were strictly about this case.

Which includes other accusations, including sexual assault and a pattern of behavior that others have affirmed.

But no, the words alone by themselves prove nothing. That's why there are other things.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

There's no law about what age someone has to be to call them beautiful. How many times do we hear adults refer to children as beautiful, etc?

No there isn't, but most adults who call children beautiful probably aren't wanting to get in the child's pants or date them.

That's the difference.

If you would draw the line at 'age of consent' perhaps we could agree with your thoughts... Saying children when the 'child' can bear children in a world where that is legal is hard for some of you to be expected to grasp from your posts, we see. Either they are of legal age or not. We can play games or we can face the facts.

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: face23785

So he is just a creepy law a Biden citizen?

Why you bringing Uncle Joe into this?

You know something?

I read a comment somewhere, can't remember where, that made the point that the signature actually looks more like Ray rather then Roy. If you read the yearbook message and end it with Ray it rhymes.

Here's a link with a good image of actual Roy Moore signatures in comparison to the yearbook.

cowgernation.com...

Maybe we need to be looking for some guy called Ray. He'll clear this up.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

There's no law about what age someone has to be to call them beautiful. How many times do we hear adults refer to children as beautiful, etc?

No there isn't, but most adults who call children beautiful probably aren't wanting to get in the child's pants or date them.

That's the difference.

If you would draw the line at 'age of consent' perhaps we could agree with your thoughts... Saying children when the 'child' can bear children in a world where that is legal is hard for some of you to be expected to grasp from your posts, we see. Either they are of legal age or not. We can play games or we can face the facts.

Of course Beverly was "legal," from what we know.

So if they're age of consent, sexual assault is acceptable?

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Justoneman

Honestly I don't know that anything has changed except the circumstances surrounding it. It's used to be for practicality at least to the woman and her parents, due to many variables. The job market for woman being bunk and more communal/farming lifestyles for example.

I have seen quite a few articles imploring understanding for pedophilia. I forget the group associated, but there was another I read that suggested kids fight for their right to own their sexuality, that their parents hold no legal guardianship to their sexual encounters. This is also being pushed from a different angle as can be seen with children transitions

I think you mean the Muslims but not sure if you are being sarc or not.


People have to agree on a legal age in this modern world it still varies. Shaming someone using today's values that were 100% acceptable 40 years ago doesn't hold water. Unless it was like saying it was ok in society to gas Jews, we have to assume society understands what is best. I personally can't stand it that there are true stories about little kids being raped any more than you it appears. Insinuating the Moore stuff to be pedo stuff is the sickness that is the left. Freedom means the girls get to decide and the Parents can step in and say no. Not the same as Afghanistan. Believing a proven liar on such an important matter with no proof other than he said she said, speaks to the believer as much as the liar.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

There's no law about what age someone has to be to call them beautiful. How many times do we hear adults refer to children as beautiful, etc?

No there isn't, but most adults who call children beautiful probably aren't wanting to get in the child's pants or date them.

That's the difference.

If you would draw the line at 'age of consent' perhaps we could agree with your thoughts... Saying children when the 'child' can bear children in a world where that is legal is hard for some of you to be expected to grasp from your posts, we see. Either they are of legal age or not. We can play games or we can face the facts.

Of course Beverly was "legal," from what we know.

So if they're age of consent, sexual assault is acceptable?

Your proof of said assault is where?

We're 9 pages into a hoax thread that still isn't called a hoax at this point.

She didn't admit to faking anything, ergo hoax.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: face23785

There's no law about what age someone has to be to call them beautiful. How many times do we hear adults refer to children as beautiful, etc?

No there isn't, but most adults who call children beautiful probably aren't wanting to get in the child's pants or date them.

That's the difference.

If you would draw the line at 'age of consent' perhaps we could agree with your thoughts... Saying children when the 'child' can bear children in a world where that is legal is hard for some of you to be expected to grasp from your posts, we see. Either they are of legal age or not. We can play games or we can face the facts.

Of course Beverly was "legal," from what we know.

So if they're age of consent, sexual assault is acceptable?

Your proof of said assault is where?

That's the thing, it can't be proved.

But I've been through this in multiple threads regarding sexual assault.

In this case, however, there is a pattern of behavior.

originally posted by: Greven
We're 9 pages into a hoax thread that still isn't called a hoax at this point.

She didn't admit to faking anything, ergo hoax.

Well, you are going to give her a pass then...Not what you should do unless you want him to be guilty of assault logic says. You can't ignore the lie about the restaurant name and date or you lose total credibility. She lied and peoples narrative flamed out that wished him to be an evil person.

originally posted by: Greven
We're 9 pages into a hoax thread that still isn't called a hoax at this point.

She didn't admit to faking anything, ergo hoax.

Did you not read all 9 pages?
She has been shown on video repeatedly through the thread stating that Roy Moore wrote the whole thing.
Now she says that she added part of it herself.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: Greven
We're 9 pages into a hoax thread that still isn't called a hoax at this point.

She didn't admit to faking anything, ergo hoax.

Did you not read all 9 pages?
She has been shown on video repeatedly throughout the thread stating that Roy Moore wrote the whole thing.
Now she says that she added part of it herself.

Add in not reporting the court case with Moore when he WAS the DA that would not have been used to sign the Annual when he was not the DA and had a person with those initials adding hers. The actual DA would not keep a bum around who was banned from a Mall for stalking teenage girls if that story was true. And the 3 other accusations she made all point to someone causing problems for people as a way of life.

a reply to: pavil

It just seemed like a good pun for the circumstances. If we're talking patterns, there has been publicly verifiable patterns of creepiness detected from that guy.

But really I don't want to stray too much. I honestly had only skimmed about the Roy Moore debacle and wanted to learn more about it. It has seemed to be a pretty partisan issue, which peaked my interest to poke my head in. I viewed pol while they were initially casting doubt of the yearbook transcipt and they presented good evidence to at least suggest discrepancies, know we know there are some.

It doesn't prove or disprove anything. I can certainly see how that along with her disinterest in allowing further examination provides suspicion on her claim.