Roy Moore's accuser has admitted to faking the yearbook.

a reply to: TheRedneck

there is a hell of a lot of smoke there and where there is smoke there is usually fire but i digress...give the man his day in court, i am no lawyer or judge but from the accusations it looks like at the very least moore was an older man that was attracted to and pursued high school girls but *kermit drinking coffee meme* that's none of my business.

a reply to: Greven

"— even though we had slavery —" would indicate to any reasonable person that he was stating that the slavery of the time was not a good thing.

Calling that inflammatory is like claiming a smoker is an arsonist because everyone's throwing gasoline on him...

TheRedneck

a reply to: conspiracy nut

All that smoke came within the last month. To claim that it is indicative of a 40 year old fire is a bit biased.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Greven

"— even though we had slavery —" would indicate to any reasonable person that he was stating that the slavery of the time was not a good thing.

Calling that inflammatory is like claiming a smoker is an arsonist because everyone's throwing gasoline on him...

TheRedneck

He answered the question by a black guy about when Amerca was last great by saying it was when slavery existed, ergo pre-Civil War.

It's almost as tone deaf as Hillary Clinton pretty much always is.

originally posted by: dasman888
a reply to: Greven

I certainly agree with that...

Greven, read the TownHall piece linked right above this and your last post. HUGE issue brought up there.

The yearbook is signed "Roy Moore DA".

As is discussed... Roy Moore never was the DA, yet court documents all were signed "Roy Moore/DA"

Those initials didn't mean District Attorney... they meant Delbra Adams, Moore’s longtime assistant and secretary... and she put them there as a "cover signature" nomenclature to document she had signed the orders via authorization of her boss, Judge Moore.

Whoever added them to the signature in the yearbook... thought they meant District Attorney... of course, unless somehow Delbra Adams was in the habit of signing things for Moore, 12 years before she worked for him. Whoever added that stuff to the yearbook, unwittingly signed into existence PROOF that there is a forgery going on here. Damn.

This whole thing... in my opinion... just got kicked up a notch to a criminal conspiracy in my mind. This lady better get a different attorney... a criminal attorney.

Why would she think a judge was a district attorney?

That makes no sense. It's disjointed conjecture.

a reply to: Greven

So, tightly-knit families are bad, and saying slavery was bad is bad. Got it.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

Are you claiming he is innocent? I myself do not consider him guilty or innocent.

If you are, then you have shown you are more willing to give an accused child molester the benefit of the doubt rather than his supposed victims. A man in his 30's should not be dating children under the age of 18, no matter what the laws state and for you to say, "as long as the law says it is OK, it is fine by me", shows what kind of character you have when it comes to dating children.

For the record, I hate Clinton. Seems to me, if I am against Moore, then I must be for Clinton which is messed up logic.

Either an accused child molester or a democrat who is not accused. Doesn't seem to be that hard of decision to me.

a reply to: TheRedneck

but you basically conceded that he did cavort with high school age girls and justify it by saying it was legal, so i concede that at the very least moore was a pervy older man who happened to be attracted to high school girls and even apparently waited til one of them was sixteen (after knowing her for 2 years) to ask her out, now that's a gentleman. mind you its not like he was a year or two older than them we are talking about a 30+ year old man prowling high schools and malls for high school aged girls. no matter which way you cut it, it doesn't sound like the kind of guy you would want to cast your vote for does it?

a reply to: Greven

Terrible thing to have close knit families.

Look at the inner city. It's a better place when blacks are mostly born to unwed single mothers. Don't you agree?

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: dasman888
a reply to: Greven

I certainly agree with that...

Greven, read the TownHall piece linked right above this and your last post. HUGE issue brought up there.

The yearbook is signed "Roy Moore DA".

As is discussed... Roy Moore never was the DA, yet court documents all were signed "Roy Moore/DA"

Those initials didn't mean District Attorney... they meant Delbra Adams, Moore’s longtime assistant and secretary... and she put them there as a "cover signature" nomenclature to document she had signed the orders via authorization of her boss, Judge Moore.

Whoever added them to the signature in the yearbook... thought they meant District Attorney... of course, unless somehow Delbra Adams was in the habit of signing things for Moore, 12 years before she worked for him. Whoever added that stuff to the yearbook, unwittingly signed into existence PROOF that there is a forgery going on here. Damn.

This whole thing... in my opinion... just got kicked up a notch to a criminal conspiracy in my mind. This lady better get a different attorney... a criminal attorney.

Why would she think a judge was a district attorney?

That makes no sense. It's disjointed conjecture.

Some one who,knows more than me can explain it,

But the claim is she copied this from a signature from when Moore was a judge or something and his assitants name had the initials DA, and she signed Moore's name.

I admit to not knowing enough of this, so I may be wrong.

But the red neck knows more about it

a reply to: DrakeMorningstar

Given his record and the timing and obvious holes in the stories of the accusers...

YES, I BELIEVE ROY MOORE IS INNOCENT.

As do 81% of Alabamians according to the latest polls aired on the radio.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

Oh right!

Man... the tangled web we weave.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Greven

So, tightly-knit families are bad, and saying slavery was bad is bad. Got it.

TheRedneck

So, you agree that tightly-knit families only existed pre-Civil War. Got it.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Greven

Terrible thing to have close knit families.

Look at the inner city. It's a better place when blacks are mostly born to unwed single mothers. Don't you agree?

Ah yes, better to sell off the kids to other slave owners.

So much more tightly knit, those families were.

a reply to: Greven

They certainly were more common then. After all, no-fault divorce and the rise of glorifying single motherhood is a relatively common thing.

originally posted by: DrakeMorningstar
a reply to: TheRedneck

Are you claiming he is innocent? I myself do not consider him guilty or innocent.

I can tell he is saying you can't believe proven liars claiming 40 year old 'harassment' and use that as any kind of a justification for ruining a man's record, days before an election. Credibility is very important concerning that signature proving he knew her.

a reply to: conspiracy nut

In that day (I dont know about now) the legal age of consent in Alabama was 14
Not that that was right (I hope it has changed now) , but that was the law.

a reply to: Grambler

i shouldn't assume that any of it was real. just playing devils advocate.

a reply to: Greven

You can tear a family apart, but that has no bearing on how much the persons in it will love one another in a tightly knit family.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: DrakeMorningstar

Given his record and the timing and obvious holes in the stories of the accusers...

YES, I BELIEVE ROY MOORE IS INNOCENT.

As do 81% of Alabamians according to the latest polls aired on the radio.

TheRedneck

Yet you ignore the fact he said he DID NOT KNOW any of these women then changed his story.

Roy Moore now claims he knows none of his accusers, contradicting his earlier defenses

Roy Moore says he doesn’t know any of the women who claim he sought romantic encounters with them when they were minors and teens, but that's not what he said when they first came forward with their stories.

He also said at that time, “Specifically, I do not know any of these women.” This would appear to contradict what Moore told Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Nov. 10.

"As I recall [Deason] was 19 or older. I never provided intoxicating liquor to a minor. I seem to remember her as a good girl,” Moore said.

In reference to Gibson, Moore said, “I don't remember going out on dates. I knew her as a friend. If we did go out on dates then we did."

So two lies and your still willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.