It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SouthernForkway26
I have dowsed for water before and it 100% worked.
So, a 0% failure rate.
That's impressive.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: rickymouse
The cloud seeders will tell you it works real good...sign this here contract and you're all set. Once you put your money down.
Don't know about those energy pulses though. Is that how dowsing works?
If you read the conclusion, the guy says there is something there and that the methods of testing whether they are real is flawed. Read the whole report, not just the part you want to see.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: rickymouse
Still like to see the science behind it, the evidence
Not interested in UFO stories and your opinion on scientific funding and my wallet, just evidence
If you have some, I would like to see it...
www.nature.com...
Another one, read down a little on this one to the pizioelectric field one. www.physicsforums.com...
This is a good one. blog.hasslberger.com...
Here is one on use of divining rods in identifying cracks in rock tomwilliamson.co...
If you look in the right direction you can find research on this kind of stuff.
One report said it was fake, another anyone and everyone can do it and the other
THE DOWSING REACTION ORIGINATES FROM PIEZOELECTRIC EFFECT IN BONE
Was one of many reasons they think it works, but no evidence offered
"Science has made very promising progress on the "easy problem" (Chalmers, 1996) - the working out of the neural mechanisms of behavior and physiological correlates of mental states. However, despite thousands of years of philosophy and over a hundred years of hard science, the "difficult problem" - the issue of how first-person experience, and the raw feels of awareness can accompany the physical processes of neurobiology - remains intractable."
Reference www.physicsforums.com...
So say what you want, its not so easily wrapped up for me as it is for you
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: rickymouse
No one has ever demonstrated this "power" under proper test conditions. It's magical thinking with a heavy dose of confirmation bias.
originally posted by: rickymouse
If you read the conclusion, the guy says there is something there and that the methods of testing whether they are real is flawed. Read the whole report, not just the part you want to see.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: rickymouse
Still like to see the science behind it, the evidence
Not interested in UFO stories and your opinion on scientific funding and my wallet, just evidence
If you have some, I would like to see it...
www.nature.com...
Another one, read down a little on this one to the pizioelectric field one. www.physicsforums.com...
This is a good one. blog.hasslberger.com...
Here is one on use of divining rods in identifying cracks in rock tomwilliamson.co...
If you look in the right direction you can find research on this kind of stuff.
One report said it was fake, another anyone and everyone can do it and the other
THE DOWSING REACTION ORIGINATES FROM PIEZOELECTRIC EFFECT IN BONE
Was one of many reasons they think it works, but no evidence offered
"Science has made very promising progress on the "easy problem" (Chalmers, 1996) - the working out of the neural mechanisms of behavior and physiological correlates of mental states. However, despite thousands of years of philosophy and over a hundred years of hard science, the "difficult problem" - the issue of how first-person experience, and the raw feels of awareness can accompany the physical processes of neurobiology - remains intractable."
Reference www.physicsforums.com...
So say what you want, its not so easily wrapped up for me as it is for you
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: rickymouse
This with my uncle was in the 1960's. I have no idea if his methods worked, but as a kid at the time it was fascinating to me. His was a metal rod, no idea of the composition and it had a clear container on the end he'd put an ounce of placer in from one of his mines.
I know he used it in Alaska and came back with about a half million in gold and remember this was in the 1960's, so for him it paid off. He immediately blew the money on another mine in Utah and I remember hearing my aunt rant about it. As a kid I was more interested in the huge Kodiak bear rug on his garage wall. I think he's one of the reasons I ended up moving to Alaska many years later. Him and his tales.
I have no idea if there is any validity to any of this, but I do know he had unusual luck with finding gold. No metal detectors around then, just his strange rod. I'm unsure what the rest of it was made of. It worked for him somehow.
He used it to teach me about the little pockets of black sand in the washes in Southern Utah, by passing it over them where it seems to bend. He showed me on one pocket of the black sand, filled a bucket with it and told me to practice panning and I'd find an ounce of gold of my own in the bucket. I did.