Trump Given A Subpoena For All Documents Relating To Assault Allegations

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?

You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm

Personally I would rather go for sex in the "fing" White House over sexual assault on anyone at anytime. I mean they don't call it the "fing" White House for nothing.

originally posted by: curme

And Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, Bill O'Reilly, and Roger Ailes.

But no, this own't hurt Trump at all.

Lets though another name on the stack... Gloria Allred

When she is involved it is about 99% bull.

Pretty sure a subpoena for a politician is signed by a judge.

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: loam

Trump Given A Subpoena For All Documents Relating To Assault Allegations

A woman who said Donald Trump groped her has subpoenaed his campaign for documents about “any woman alleging that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately.” Trump has denied her accusations and is fighting the subpoena.

A high-stakes legal showdown is brewing for President Donald Trump, as a woman who said he groped her has subpoenaed all documents from his campaign pertaining to “any woman alleging that Donald J. Trump touched her inappropriately.”

The subpoena — whose contents have not been previously reported — was issued in March but entered into the court file last month. The White House did not respond to a request for comment, nor did Trump’s attorney.

This is breaking now.

So is this Trump's true vulnerability?

Everyone is vulnerable to lies from a group of people willing to do anything to remove them from power. This is how Herman Cain was taken out a few years ago.

Lies you say?

Because I'm pretty sure once again that there's video tape of him admitting it.


Sure lies.

It's possible.

He is certainly a known liar. None of us can deny that. He lies as casually as I breathe.

a reply to: loam

It was filed in March.

??


It's right there in the story.

a reply to: olaru12

No they didn't try to impeach slick Willy for getting a BJ.

They impeached him for LYING.


Ut oh.....

a reply to: Xtrozero

No it's not. The woman is a very successful lawyer.

You're being ridiculous in saying if she's involved it's bull.

That in itself is where the bull is.
You're just saying that because she's going after trump. You know it and so does everybody else.

If she was in fact going after Bill Clinton for something she'd be the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Again you know it and so does everybody else.
The truth is you never even heard of her before this.

The truth is you really have no idea about her or her career or her success rate.

a reply to: xuenchen

There's no end to your nonsense is there?
You're like Felix the Cat with his endless bag of tricks.

a reply to: RazorV66

#ing hilarious that they just piss in the wind and hope some splashes on Trump.

Funny you should put it just that way....

a reply to: yuppa

Just like the Russia probe is turning up nothing?

LOL

a reply to: carewemust

What?

a reply to: MysticPearl

So we should just never believe a woman who says she was assaulted because....she's a woman?

And you say liberals are sexist.


I'm not sure you know what that word means dear.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MysticPearl

So we should just never believe a woman who says she was assaulted because....she's a woman?

And you say liberals are sexist.


I'm not sure you know what that word means dear.

I would be very carful believing a woman with an agenda or a man for that matter.

a reply to: Metallicus

But how do you know they are lies?

Seems more than plausible to me.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Yes, but only first available last month.

...was issued in March but entered into the court file last month.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: loam

so they got wind that the "Russia investigations" are looking completely retarded and will show their failure at finding anything illicit. This shall foreshadow their ability to waste countless tax dollars over nothing.

So in turn they do this. Spit in the faces of women who were real victims of sexual assault, just to keep the witch hunt going.

Kiss my ass with this already...

That's pretty much it.

The Russian collusion garbage was never real and never going to fly. Now they have to jump on whatever the next BS idea is.

America is tired of it and sees right through it. Sorry Liberals, you're playbook is done.

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?

You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm

Apparently, you don't intellectually understand the difference between consensual and non-consensual (sexual assault).

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: yuppa

Just like the Russia probe is turning up nothing?

LOL

Was trump prosecuted for his comments? NO he was not. Did said woman press charges? No she did not. SOme women like a aggressive guy.

ANd SO far No nothing on Trump himself. No prosecution. No conviction,so No not anything has turned up. Oh and Lol.

remember its not guilty until proven to be so. Not the other way around.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?

You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm

Apparently, you don't intellectually understand the difference between consensual and non-consensual (sexual assault).

The same difference between lies and facts. Its mighty funny how all the sudden these women come out of nowhere(some of them PAID to do so) and make accusations.
But heres whats missing. a CONVICTION or a Trial. Until those happen He is Innocent.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: yuppa

Just like the Russia probe is turning up nothing?

LOL

Was trump prosecuted for his comments? NO he was not. Did said woman press charges? No she did not. SOme women like a aggressive guy.

ANd SO far No nothing on Trump himself. No prosecution. No conviction,so No not anything has turned up. Oh and Lol.

remember its not guilty until proven to be so. Not the other way around.

Unfortunately no conviction for the elite is not an indicator of justice. Ahem HRC.