Trump Given A Subpoena For All Documents Relating To Assault Allegations

originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
I'm sure Trump has had some sexual proclivities throughout his life. Funny that these never became an issue until he tried to help the USA get back on it's feet. I do think Trump should be held accountable if he committed illegal actions, but clearly this is an attempt to ruin a US President and keep the US as a globalist puppet.

I agree with nearly every word.

Who wants fries with their nothing burger?

a reply to: loam


So, I was supposed to read your other thread first, before commenting?

Still, even that post doesn't answer my question about how Harvey Weinstein is a "pawn" but all the other aren't?

Here's an old article from Nov 2016.

BREAKING: Ex-Apprentice #SummerZervos Paid $500,000 By @GloriaAllred To Accuse Trump, Deal Went To Others Too

BwaaaHaHaHa

originally posted by: xuenchen
Here's an old article from Nov 2016.

BREAKING: Ex-Apprentice #SummerZervos Paid $500,000 By @GloriaAllred To Accuse Trump, Deal Went To Others Too

BwaaaHaHaHa

#ing hilarious that they just piss in the wind and hope some splashes on Trump.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: loam


So, I was supposed to read your other thread first, before commenting?

No. Why would you read my post that way? I was addressing your question with no intended hostility. Chill dude.

Still, even that post doesn't answer my question about how Harvey Weinstein is a "pawn" but all the other aren't?

Here is what I said in the second post on that thread.

I think the FOX executions were a coordinated effort to kill the perceived mouthpiece that got Trump elected. Those attacks were so successful largely because sexual misconduct is not a party line issue. If you take out some big liberal icon names for the same reason, you substantially remove from the table later (assuming Trump is ultimately driven out on similar grounds) that such an initiative against him on these grounds was purely partisan.

In my opinion, it's the one way to take Trump out without nearly half the nation screaming coup. The stage seems in the process of being set with the Weinstein scandal and the ones that follow.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Here's an old article from Nov 2016.

BREAKING: Ex-Apprentice #SummerZervos Paid $500,000 By @GloriaAllred To Accuse Trump, Deal Went To Others Too

BwaaaHaHaHa

Gotnews.com - Never heard of it.

So Allred commits a criminal act of trying to frame someone including payment, that someone who is now the president and in possibly the biggest position in politics and nothing at all happens to her, doesn't seem legit does it.

a reply to: Taggart

And those allegations turned up nothing after being looked into. it wa sdeemed locker room talk. th e woman in question didnt have any problems apparently. so no crime.

a reply to: Taggart

Now you know why TORT Reform is needed in this country

a reply to: loam


Okay, I'm chill.

I don't think that Trump's war with women during the campaign season helped him, but I don't think sexual assault accusations will be Trump's fall. I think that society is ready to change the way women are perceived in the work place, and the most egregious offenders are the first to get called out.

There's already plenty to take Trump out, if Congress ever should be so motivated, as well as his Cabinet, should they want to trigger the 25th Amendment. Abuse of power, obstruction of justice, failure to uphold his oath, emollient violations, there's no need to add sex crimes.

Inn my opinion, this Apprentice set groping affair is not enough to change anything. Even if the pee pee tapes were released, nothing would come of it.

a reply to: JacKatMtn


We all know from recent history and current events that the more Donald Trump is attacked, the stronger he gets.

BRING IT ON!

a reply to: carewemust

The far left doesn't realize that "WAG THE DOG" doesn't work anymore...

Folks have blown past that charade....


Go Hillary!!! LMAO!!

Why are liberals so sexist?

Automatically believe any woman claiming she was touched inappropriately. It automatically puts a woman's word above a man's. Happens over and over. Duke lacrosse? Just a well known example.

If a man were to claim the same, he'd be laughed at.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Taggart

And those allegations turned up nothing after being looked into. it wa sdeemed locker room talk. th e woman in question didnt have any problems apparently. so no crime.

You're talking like he's talking about one person,

he literally says Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.

That quote could easily be attributed to Weinstein

a reply to: loam

Huh I always thought his vulnerability was the subpoena to testify at Epstein's court case...

Things that make you go hmmm...

a reply to: Taggart

You aren't seriously deflecting from a Hollywood Power Player being exposed for what he is, and trying to shift focus on POTUS are you?


Get a grip... Weinstein isn't the only power player in the cesspool that is Hollywood....

a reply to: TruMcCarthy Wth so you think that he should just get a get out of jail card??? Wow

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: olaru12
They tried to impeach Slick Willy for his consenting Bj in office.

Why should Trump get to skate for his assaults?

You don’t intellectually understand the difference between having a sexual encounter in the fing White House with an intern while in office and an alleged sexual assault as a private citizen years before entering public service? Hmmmmm

The fing White House?

Is that like the Ming Dynasty, only hornier?

I wonder if this has anything to do with Larry Flynt’s offer of what was it - $1MM? For infirnation leading to Trump’s impeachment? Not that this could directly but...

Anyway, from my perspective as a woman, what Trump said is vastly different from what Weinstein said. I mean, I’m almost 50 and considered fairly attractive by most. I’ve been in the corporate world for 23 years in executive positions for the last 18. I’ve had some serious unwanted advances made, but nothing I couldn’t rebuke. It may not make sense to some but the advances themselves didnt bother me so long as I was never made to feel like I was being threatened (with my job or forced participation). And none I experienced got to that point.

It may not be PC to say, but I feel like a good number of men (not all mind you but more than a handfull) in powerful positions or with extremely-elevated financial status may try to use their position or status to push for extracurricular attention. But in many cases they’ve been “taught” it works. Plus there are members of the opposite sex who “play the game” too... to the point where it seems like it is a game.

That being said, in my opinion, it’s only when the pursuer or aggressor refuses to take no for an answer, threaten retribution for non-compliance, or forces a woman into participation, that I personally believe it’s a “situation” that is in need of outside intervention or addressing. I think we are hurting the very real victims of those situations when every “unwanted” sexual advance is called sexual harassment. Which might be why Weinstein got away with his behavior for so long...

Again, I realize that may not be a very popular line of thinking but it’s my opinion. And I don’t feel I’ve ever been demeaned or discriminated against etc. based on that thought process.

a reply to: Metallicus

It doesn't help that Donald Trump has been recorded demonstrating how he rolls, plus the many allegations over the years of Hollywood elites and Trump himself being rapey don't help him much.