It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flat earth theory?

page: 158
14
<< 155  156  157    159  160  161 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 05:54 AM
link   
a reply to: oldcarpy

Figure it out.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:04 AM
link   
a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

Why do you think there is not an altitude with a corresponding speed that would result in a satellite orbiting the circumference of earth over 24 hours.

So? You believe a satellite can orbit the earth 1.1 times every 24 hours. Is that false?

You believe a satellite can orbit the earth .9 times every 24 hours? Is that false.

But you believe a satellite cannot orbit the earth once every 24 hours? Why is that impossible.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity



because he believes that they cant orbit the earth and remain fixed in position over the earth at the same time.




No because in order to orbit the Earth it is going to have to move around the Earth.


Really some sort of cognitive behavior study should be done on this group.

Amazing stuff.


Aye ok we get that is what you believe , but according to the rest of the world , a geostationary satellite does orbit the earth , just not in the way that you understand , it is still in orbit around the earth. It just doesnt appear to move to the observer as it is in geosynchronous orbit



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:19 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux





But you believe a satellite cannot orbit the earth once every 24 hours? Why is that impossible.


I didnt say that was impossible.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: sapien82




but according to the rest of the world , a geostationary satellite does orbit the earth , just not in the way that you understand , it is still in orbit around the earth.




This is getting bizarre.

No, a geostationary satellite does not go around the Earth.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: neutronflux





But you believe a satellite cannot orbit the earth once every 24 hours? Why is that impossible.


I didnt say that was impossible.



Then you agree on the below calculations...



So what is your argument.

Science and practical application shows that at the right height and speed, a satellite will orbit the circumference of the earth once a day. Is that false.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: oldcarpy

Figure it out.


I can't. That's why I asked you to explain. Can you?



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:27 AM
link   
a reply to: InfiniteTrinity




This is getting bizarre.


Tedious, more like.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:30 AM
link   
a reply to: sapien82

This is what the individual has recently posted

InfiniteTrinity


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Given that geostationary orbits dont exist, I do deny that. Why do you still have to ask?




Me


And you don’t deny Geostationary satellites are providing services from outer space.


InfiniteTrinity


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Given that geostationary orbits dont exist, I do deny that. Why do you still have to ask?



Either InfiniteTrinity believes geostationary orbit is impossible, or the individual likes moving the argument around.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:32 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




Science and practical application shows that at the right height and speed, a satellite will orbit the circumference of the earth once a day.


Except geostationary satellites, they dont orbit the Earth.

Do you really wanna tell me that you still cant foresee my answer to the same mistake you made 300 times now?



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: neutronflux




Science and practical application shows that at the right height and speed, a satellite will orbit the circumference of the earth once a day.


Except geostationary satellites, they dont orbit the Earth.

Do you really wanna tell me that you still cant foresee my answer to the same mistake you made 300 times now?



Are their geostationary satellites above earth providing services at this second.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:36 AM
link   
Lol the dialogue and confusion about what it is that I am saying.

And the angst. Rofl.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:37 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




Are their geostationary satellites above earth providing services at this second.


Oh this one again.

Unlikely since geostationary orbits dont exist.

Surprised?



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:38 AM
link   
a reply to: oldcarpy

Sorry I dont explain irony. Its reserved for people that get it.



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:40 AM
link   
a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

Speaking for myself, I am not surprised at all but I am also bored with your obvious trolling.
You don't even do it very well. There are world class trolls on here but you come in well towards the bottom of the troll table.

Nothing to say about FE, the topic of this thread? No?



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: neutronflux




Are their geostationary satellites above earth providing services at this second.


Oh this one again.

Unlikely since geostationary orbits dont exist.

Surprised?


Based on what?




posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:42 AM
link   
a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

So. Your wrong with nothing to back erroneous opinion. Surprise.
edit on 20-8-2019 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:42 AM
link   
a reply to: oldcarpy




Nothing to say about FE, the topic of this thread? No?





posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:43 AM
link   
a reply to: InfiniteTrinity

That's because there was no irony in my post and you can't explain why there might have been.

InfiniteTrinity - debunked. Again.






posted on Aug, 20 2019 @ 06:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: InfiniteTrinity
a reply to: oldcarpy




Nothing to say about FE, the topic of this thread? No?




So, are you denying that the topic of this thread is FE Theory?




top topics



 
14
<< 155  156  157    159  160  161 >>

log in

join