It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
originally posted by: SprocketUK
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
It seems to have totally been ignored that they turned up wearing helmets, carrying shields and wielding baseball bats.
Frankly ,if you are going anywhere that antifa are likely to be, you'd have to be a fool not to be tooled up. They do have a history of violence against those they don't like, after all.
So anyone who turns up to oppose a group wanting to keep a statue of the leader of an army who's main aim was to continue to enslave other human beings is automatically a member of Antifa now?
Here in England the local EDL (English Nationalist Party) organised a march against Muslims in my home town. Quite a few of us turned up to laugh and jeer at them. Does that make me Antifa?
You're making a huge leap in assuming the anti-protest protest was organised by Antifa. It may have been but you cannot condone turning up wearing home-made riot gear is an acceptable way to organise a march just in case there's a bit of bother.
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
originally posted by: SprocketUK
originally posted by: PheonixReborn
It seems to have totally been ignored that they turned up wearing helmets, carrying shields and wielding baseball bats.
Frankly ,if you are going anywhere that antifa are likely to be, you'd have to be a fool not to be tooled up. They do have a history of violence against those they don't like, after all.
So anyone who turns up to oppose a group wanting to keep a statue of the leader of an army who's main aim was to continue to enslave other human beings is automatically a member of Antifa now?
Here in England the local EDL (English Nationalist Party) organised a march against Muslims in my home town. Quite a few of us turned up to laugh and jeer at them. Does that make me Antifa?
You're making a huge leap in assuming the anti-protest protest was organised by Antifa. It may have been but you cannot condone turning up wearing home-made riot gear is an acceptable way to organise a march just in case there's a bit of bother.
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: smurfy
Trump should have called it out properly in his last statement, and sent a direct message to the 'Alt right.
That's a big problem, he has no bother calling out this staffer that staffer, yet he can't spit out Putin bad boy, KKK anti-ethnics, WS for what they are...he should even for his own interests in the long run, be distancing himself from people like that, but no he doesn't.
So anytime someone does something you feel the president should have to cmention on it. Seriously????? Wow the american public has gothen stupid. The president should not have to disavow every nut case just because you think he should.
He has no problem attacking people. He'll attack people in his own party. Even his own administration.
But when it comes to racists, Nazis and Putin ... he just cannot do it.
That clearly tells you where his allegiances lie.
Wow, this post literally made me cringe. You're truly lost in the world where our President wears a hood and burns crosses. Trouble is, that world is make believe and you lose all credibility with this post.
Odd.
I guess you've missed the White Nationalist (i.e. Nazis) that he continually fails to condemn. Or the number he's hired. Bannon, Gorka, etc.
I'll happily stand against those who fail to condemn Nazis. I'll happily stand against those who chose Nazis to serve in political positions in the White House.
You may cringe. But I shake my head about your failure to condemn those who support and appease White Nationalists and Nazis.
You've either been brainwashed by Trump and his Orange Petunias. Or you simply stand with Nazis.
I know this site has become a haven for such opinions. But history has already judged those who choose to side with Nazis.
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: smurfy
Trump should have called it out properly in his last statement, and sent a direct message to the 'Alt right.
That's a big problem, he has no bother calling out this staffer that staffer, yet he can't spit out Putin bad boy, KKK anti-ethnics, WS for what they are...he should even for his own interests in the long run, be distancing himself from people like that, but no he doesn't.
So anytime someone does something you feel the president should have to cmention on it. Seriously????? Wow the american public has gothen stupid. The president should not have to disavow every nut case just because you think he should.
He has no problem attacking people. He'll attack people in his own party. Even his own administration.
But when it comes to racists, Nazis and Putin ... he just cannot do it.
That clearly tells you where his allegiances lie.
Wow, this post literally made me cringe. You're truly lost in the world where our President wears a hood and burns crosses. Trouble is, that world is make believe and you lose all credibility with this post.
Odd.
I guess you've missed the White Nationalist (i.e. Nazis) that he continually fails to condemn. Or the number he's hired. Bannon, Gorka, etc.
I'll happily stand against those who fail to condemn Nazis. I'll happily stand against those who chose Nazis to serve in political positions in the White House.
You may cringe. But I shake my head about your failure to condemn those who support and appease White Nationalists and Nazis.
You've either been brainwashed by Trump and his Orange Petunias. Or you simply stand with Nazis.
I know this site has become a haven for such opinions. But history has already judged those who choose to side with Nazis.
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Moresby
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: smurfy
Trump should have called it out properly in his last statement, and sent a direct message to the 'Alt right.
That's a big problem, he has no bother calling out this staffer that staffer, yet he can't spit out Putin bad boy, KKK anti-ethnics, WS for what they are...he should even for his own interests in the long run, be distancing himself from people like that, but no he doesn't.
So anytime someone does something you feel the president should have to cmention on it. Seriously????? Wow the american public has gothen stupid. The president should not have to disavow every nut case just because you think he should.
He has no problem attacking people. He'll attack people in his own party. Even his own administration.
But when it comes to racists, Nazis and Putin ... he just cannot do it.
That clearly tells you where his allegiances lie.
Wow, this post literally made me cringe. You're truly lost in the world where our President wears a hood and burns crosses. Trouble is, that world is make believe and you lose all credibility with this post.
Odd.
I guess you've missed the White Nationalist (i.e. Nazis) that he continually fails to condemn. Or the number he's hired. Bannon, Gorka, etc.
I'll happily stand against those who fail to condemn Nazis. I'll happily stand against those who chose Nazis to serve in political positions in the White House.
You may cringe. But I shake my head about your failure to condemn those who support and appease White Nationalists and Nazis.
You've either been brainwashed by Trump and his Orange Petunias. Or you simply stand with Nazis.
I know this site has become a haven for such opinions. But history has already judged those who choose to side with Nazis.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
a reply to: Willtell
I'm not even going to bite for a post comparing Lee to Hitler.
There was no treason- nobody was tried for treason for fighting for the Confederacy.
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
a reply to: Willtell
I'm not even going to bite for a post comparing Lee to Hitler.
There was no treason- nobody was tried for treason for fighting for the Confederacy.
I think if you were a black slave in 1865 you'd feel different
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: dragonridr
Of course they should be condemned, but they really aren't much of a threat to our democracy.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: dragonridr
Of course they should be condemned, but they really aren't much of a threat to our democracy.
I can agree. Though, the same could be said about BLM and Antifa.
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
a reply to: Willtell
I'm not even going to bite for a post comparing Lee to Hitler.
There was no treason- nobody was tried for treason for fighting for the Confederacy.
I think if you were a black slave in 1865 you'd feel different
Find me one...just ONE black slave and then we can discuss this further. Until then, the point is moot. No white men I know in my family or others have owned a slaved in their lifetimes.
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: dragonridr
This is one thing that bugs me, the media and leftists act as if these white supremacists are a massive organization with untold millions of members. They just had the biggest white supremacy rally in decades, and it was a few hundred people. This is a tiny, insignificant fringe, that gets blown up for leftist political purposes to smear conservatives. Of course they should be condemned, but they really aren't much of a threat to our democracy, and they certainly don't represent republicans or conservatives.
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: dragonridr
This is one thing that bugs me, the media and leftists act as if these white supremacists are a massive organization with untold millions of members. They just had the biggest white supremacy rally in decades, and it was a few hundred people. This is a tiny, insignificant fringe, that gets blown up for leftist political purposes to smear conservatives. Of course they should be condemned, but they really aren't much of a threat to our democracy, and they certainly don't represent republicans or conservatives.
What do you mean they have the president as one of their own. You don't think that's a big thing. They do.
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: Anathros
originally posted by: Willtell
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
a reply to: Willtell
I'm not even going to bite for a post comparing Lee to Hitler.
There was no treason- nobody was tried for treason for fighting for the Confederacy.
I think if you were a black slave in 1865 you'd feel different
Find me one...just ONE black slave and then we can discuss this further. Until then, the point is moot. No white men I know in my family or others have owned a slaved in their lifetimes.
Were talking about the history of the fight for freedom and morality that transcends time and place.
Just go to Israel and try to put up a poster of Nazi regalia.
A black person in 2017 shouldn’t have to see statues of racists who enslaved their ancestors just as Jews shouldn’t have to see pictures of Nazi regalia.
Would you like statues of British generals who fought against the American patriots in the war of independence?
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
a reply to: dragonridr
This is one thing that bugs me, the media and leftists act as if these white supremacists are a massive organization with untold millions of members. They just had the biggest white supremacy rally in decades, and it was a few hundred people. This is a tiny, insignificant fringe, that gets blown up for leftist political purposes to smear conservatives. Of course they should be condemned, but they really aren't much of a threat to our democracy, and they certainly don't represent republicans or conservatives.