It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: Gryphon66
I'm not proud of my family history. But, I am an old woman now and people should know the deep secrets of racists hearts. They hurt their own too.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gryphon66
While you're desperately casting about for justifications for slavery ... you might want to check out your Bible.
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Ephesians 6:5, NIV
Jesus taught in the context of the time, so did Paul. The context of the time was the aforementioned Roman Empire. What was very, very exceedingly common during that time? Slavery. His purpose was not to upend the established social order, but to teach people how they must be toward one another within the context of that framework.
If you know much of anything about the Bible, you know this was why the Jews rejected Him. They expected a conquering hero King like David who would free them from the Roman Empire and restore the Kingdom of Judea and that's not what they got. So they are still looking for Messiah today.
How typical; when the horrors of your Book are pointed out, suddenly, it's not 100% the inspired Word of God ... it's a historical document.
At least we finally agree on that one point.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gryphon66
While you're desperately casting about for justifications for slavery ... you might want to check out your Bible.
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Ephesians 6:5, NIV
Jesus taught in the context of the time, so did Paul. The context of the time was the aforementioned Roman Empire. What was very, very exceedingly common during that time? Slavery. His purpose was not to upend the established social order, but to teach people how they must be toward one another within the context of that framework.
If you know much of anything about the Bible, you know this was why the Jews rejected Him. They expected a conquering hero King like David who would free them from the Roman Empire and restore the Kingdom of Judea and that's not what they got. So they are still looking for Messiah today.
How typical; when the horrors of your Book are pointed out, suddenly, it's not 100% the inspired Word of God ... it's a historical document.
At least we finally agree on that one point.
Christianity at that time in history was in zero position to do much of anything regarding the practices of Rome ect save getting feed to lions. Fast forward to 1860 america and the anti slavery movement and you will find the opposite to be true.
originally posted by: Spider879
a reply to: ketsuko
OK but, here is the thing, those symbols are being employed for more than just a remainder of the past, and a lesson about history, they are being used as a lighting rod to foment war or subjection, again reference Dylan Roof.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gryphon66
While you're desperately casting about for justifications for slavery ... you might want to check out your Bible.
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Ephesians 6:5, NIV
Jesus taught in the context of the time, so did Paul. The context of the time was the aforementioned Roman Empire. What was very, very exceedingly common during that time? Slavery. His purpose was not to upend the established social order, but to teach people how they must be toward one another within the context of that framework.
If you know much of anything about the Bible, you know this was why the Jews rejected Him. They expected a conquering hero King like David who would free them from the Roman Empire and restore the Kingdom of Judea and that's not what they got. So they are still looking for Messiah today.
How typical; when the horrors of your Book are pointed out, suddenly, it's not 100% the inspired Word of God ... it's a historical document.
At least we finally agree on that one point.
Christianity at that time in history was in zero position to do much of anything regarding the practices of Rome ect save getting feed to lions. Fast forward to 1860 america and the anti slavery movement and you will find the opposite to be true.
You're speaking of history ... not the alleged 100% inspiration/authorship of the Bible by Gawd.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gryphon66
While you're desperately casting about for justifications for slavery ... you might want to check out your Bible.
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Ephesians 6:5, NIV
Jesus taught in the context of the time, so did Paul. The context of the time was the aforementioned Roman Empire. What was very, very exceedingly common during that time? Slavery. His purpose was not to upend the established social order, but to teach people how they must be toward one another within the context of that framework.
If you know much of anything about the Bible, you know this was why the Jews rejected Him. They expected a conquering hero King like David who would free them from the Roman Empire and restore the Kingdom of Judea and that's not what they got. So they are still looking for Messiah today.
How typical; when the horrors of your Book are pointed out, suddenly, it's not 100% the inspired Word of God ... it's a historical document.
At least we finally agree on that one point.
Christianity at that time in history was in zero position to do much of anything regarding the practices of Rome ect save getting feed to lions. Fast forward to 1860 america and the anti slavery movement and you will find the opposite to be true.
You're speaking of history ... not the alleged 100% inspiration/authorship of the Bible by Gawd.
Jesus's purpose was to correct people's relationship with God, not create a social rebellion against the Roman Empire.
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: testingtesting
Well it is good to know who the nazi sympathisers are on Ats. Great thread to find out.
I hope it's a wake-up call to Skeptic and the others who run this site. There's no denying that we've taken several steps away from "Deny Ignorance" and several steps towards Stormfront.
They either need to take a stand or just let themselves get lumped in with all the white nationalist forums.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: yuppa
silencing a unpopular Opinion is just as bad as hate speech.
No, it's really not.
You are being hateful to someone who disagrees with you. yes it is.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gryphon66
While you're desperately casting about for justifications for slavery ... you might want to check out your Bible.
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Ephesians 6:5, NIV
Jesus taught in the context of the time, so did Paul. The context of the time was the aforementioned Roman Empire. What was very, very exceedingly common during that time? Slavery. His purpose was not to upend the established social order, but to teach people how they must be toward one another within the context of that framework.
If you know much of anything about the Bible, you know this was why the Jews rejected Him. They expected a conquering hero King like David who would free them from the Roman Empire and restore the Kingdom of Judea and that's not what they got. So they are still looking for Messiah today.
How typical; when the horrors of your Book are pointed out, suddenly, it's not 100% the inspired Word of God ... it's a historical document.
At least we finally agree on that one point.
Christianity at that time in history was in zero position to do much of anything regarding the practices of Rome ect save getting feed to lions. Fast forward to 1860 america and the anti slavery movement and you will find the opposite to be true.
You're speaking of history ... not the alleged 100% inspiration/authorship of the Bible by Gawd.
originally posted by: Ansuzrune
I knew this was coming. The left has become so radical using political correctness as its tool, it was surely going to cause the very extreme right to come out. The conservatives have become too quiet in the face of screeching liberals. The left has already become violent as in the USC Berkeley riots. What was to be expected ? You think the extreme right was going to sit idle ? This is the same type of situation that happened in Germany in the 1930's. The Hollywood Jewish left Marxists are causing trouble and using the dumbed down black population to do it. Now I am not accusing all Jewish people of being extreme left and Marxist. In Germany they were the ones pushing for Communism as they did in Russia in the early 1900's. The Bolshevik Revolution was its result for the Russians and it cost twenty million lives. It's no wonder extreme right wing elements in Germany came to the forefront to protect Germans. Truth can be hard to swallow sometimes. For myself it is true. I grew up in a Jewish family. When a duck is duck call it so.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Logarock
Slavery had already been made illegal in Europe long before 1860. What took us so long....
Fast forward to the illegals in boom towns across the sw for an answer.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Gryphon66
While you're desperately casting about for justifications for slavery ... you might want to check out your Bible.
Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.
Ephesians 6:5, NIV
Jesus taught in the context of the time, so did Paul. The context of the time was the aforementioned Roman Empire. What was very, very exceedingly common during that time? Slavery. His purpose was not to upend the established social order, but to teach people how they must be toward one another within the context of that framework.
If you know much of anything about the Bible, you know this was why the Jews rejected Him. They expected a conquering hero King like David who would free them from the Roman Empire and restore the Kingdom of Judea and that's not what they got. So they are still looking for Messiah today.
How typical; when the horrors of your Book are pointed out, suddenly, it's not 100% the inspired Word of God ... it's a historical document.
At least we finally agree on that one point.
Christianity at that time in history was in zero position to do much of anything regarding the practices of Rome ect save getting feed to lions. Fast forward to 1860 america and the anti slavery movement and you will find the opposite to be true.
You're speaking of history ... not the alleged 100% inspiration/authorship of the Bible by Gawd.
Jesus's purpose was to correct people's relationship with God, not create a social rebellion against the Roman Empire.
How wonderful that you can speak for Jesus! I'm stating that those who believe that the Bible is the 100% inspired word of God must accept that it promotes slavery.
All the other arguments are your own scarecrows to hang.
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: yuppa
silencing a unpopular Opinion is just as bad as hate speech.
No, it's really not.
You are being hateful to someone who disagrees with you. yes it is.
You clowns crack me up, honestly.
Go and try telling a Nazi that your Constitutional rights are being infringed because they're partaking in hate speech.
I'm sure Nazi's will back off and think to themselves, "Wow! We murdered 10+M people during our reign, we can't do that here! They have a Consitution!"
Because we ALL know Nazi's respect the law and Consitution lololololololol
ETA: people are right. This nation is a progressives wet dream.
If Nazism had popped up in today's world as opposed to in the 30's/40's, we wouldn't even invade them.
We'd be too busy reminding each other that it's even worse to silence the viewpoint of a mass-murdering terrorist than it is to allow them their reign of terror.
Crybabies whining about Nazi's not being treated equally in America in 2017.... go take your pity-party to social media so you sick, deranged losers can lose your jobs over affiliating with Nazism.
originally posted by: Konduit
originally posted by: RomeByFire
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Abysha
originally posted by: yuppa
silencing a unpopular Opinion is just as bad as hate speech.
No, it's really not.
You are being hateful to someone who disagrees with you. yes it is.
You clowns crack me up, honestly.
Go and try telling a Nazi that your Constitutional rights are being infringed because they're partaking in hate speech.
I'm sure Nazi's will back off and think to themselves, "Wow! We murdered 10+M people during our reign, we can't do that here! They have a Consitution!"
Because we ALL know Nazi's respect the law and Consitution lololololololol
ETA: people are right. This nation is a progressives wet dream.
If Nazism had popped up in today's world as opposed to in the 30's/40's, we wouldn't even invade them.
We'd be too busy reminding each other that it's even worse to silence the viewpoint of a mass-murdering terrorist than it is to allow them their reign of terror.
Crybabies whining about Nazi's not being treated equally in America in 2017.... go take your pity-party to social media so you sick, deranged losers can lose your jobs over affiliating with Nazism.
What cracks me up is the fact that LARP'ers like you actually believe that Nazi boogeymen are hiding around every corner. What is this obsession with a German workers party that hasn't existed for 80 years?