It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

*Hunting the Fast Movers*... back to the past!

page: 7
28
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 14 2017 @ 04:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jukiodone
a reply to: GrumpyBollocks

Which pics are you saying are real?

Pretty sure all of these pics were debunked at one point or another (except the real one of a SR 71).

The shovel nose triangle is a shoop of the underside of a Typhoon with upper section and identifiers removed.

You say an old service friend...were you in the RAF?


Completely agree with the Typhoon deduction, it's plain to see to anyone familiar with the type. The middle pics appear to show the D-21 drone and could be genuine, or of a model.



posted on Aug, 14 2017 @ 10:58 PM
link   
Reminds of a Captcha image.Find the one true pic to go to next level..



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 05:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Blackfinger
For me the right bottom picture could be something real and nothing to see with a SR-71. Its a daylight picture but it seem early in the morning.



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 06:30 AM
link   
This is what I think, too. The pic was taken during early morning hours, possibly at sunrise...

It makes me think if there are necelles in the way like those on SR-71 or if the engines are mounted internally..
edit on 15-8-2017 by SpeedFanatic because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 09:17 AM
link   
I was unable to edit my previous post that's why I had to wrote new one lol

I've just made a 'photo sightseeing' using Photoshop... It looks like the engines are mounted internally. Look closely.




If there would be nacelles like those on SR-71, then we could see outlines of them.
Look for comparision:


Outlines of nacelles are easly seen in sunshine scenery on a comparision pic..
edit on 15-8-2017 by SpeedFanatic because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 09:54 AM
link   
a reply to: SpeedFanatic

Someone has obviously tried to mislead people with those other pics so yeah..maybe that is a post delivery, stealth modified SR-71- but more likely- it is another shoop.

Notice how provocatively named GrumpyBollocks pops up to promote it then is never seen again..any real RAF guy worth his salt would still be here boring us to death with his posting stories by now..



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 11:59 AM
link   
Well I think it's a A12 or Sr71 it might be similar to what had to be airlifted from the UK with it's mid section covered and went back to Palmdale, seems like a Sr71 cousin would fly from the UK and seeing as the wheels collapsed on take off needed to go home.

And the mid section covering up a modernized SR71 variation makes sense wanting to be hidden, as a stealthy Sr71 cousin would be obvious by the midsection
edit on 15-8-2017 by penroc3 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: penroc3

I agree with you I honestly think it's a Sr71 just taken in low resolution. Plus the time of day it was taken makes me believe it isn't a classified airframe at all. Just my hunch I could be totally wrong.



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: penroc3

So, are you telling that it is regular SR-71 or the modernized SR-71?



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Woody510
I don't think so there is a lot of details who d'ont match with the SR-71, on the picture it look like the landing gear are closing in the front direction of the plane , it's not the case on the SR-71 the tail is not the same too.



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: SpeedFanatic

The picture in question it's so blury I would be cautious saying it was any thing other then a long dark pointed aircraft.


I posted a picture of a A-12 with a modified version of the nose and to ME the pic looks like that A-12 at a quirkie angle.

Do I think there is a two stage to orgit or maybe even a SSTO aircraft with similar body lines, yes.

There is undoubtedly a manned US sub orbital platform, how it get up and back is the real question.

I'm not talking BBT I'm talking sleek and sexy aircraft



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: SpeedFanatic

There is undoubtedly a manned US sub orbital platform, how it get up and back is the real question.



Is it the Yellow/bright light that was mentioned numerous times in other ATS thread? :
"It flies out towards the target, a denied intelligence target with air defences. It cruises pretty nice & high but still on good ol kerosene & air.

When it gets close it points its nose upwards and lights up the can of GFJ, maybe with some onboard oxidizer as well (i.e. a rocket).

Pilot presses the "Yee Haw!" button and gets smashed back into the seat for three awesome minutes. Then as she goes over the target, all engines out, falling ballistically---extremely high and suborbital. Why? Low infrared and optical signature, and it's so high and fast no SAM will possibly catch it. Snaps clear pictures as the ride is very smooth, everything quiet, nothing running. Then on the way back, restart the normal jets, meet up with the gas station, and relax for the cruise home."

???



posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 04:59 PM
link   
a reply to: SpeedFanatic

I can attest that the orange/yellow light can certainly move very fast.



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 12:31 AM
link   
Like I said brother, I can't prove one word of what I'm saying or the stories I tell, I promise they are the 100% truth as I know it.

For whatever that's worth on the internet lol



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 12:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: SpeedFanatic

originally posted by: penroc3
a reply to: SpeedFanatic

There is undoubtedly a manned US sub orbital platform, how it get up and back is the real question.



It cruises pretty nice & high but still on good ol kerosene & air.

When it gets close it points its nose upwards and lights up the can of GFJ, maybe with some onboard oxidizer as well (i.e. a rocket).


Might explain the large quantities of nitromethane, that have been purchased and delivered to a particular airbase.

I have posted a couple of times about the pulsating/twinklish fast moving light, that rises from the southeast and passes over the central sierra on a general north west path.

What if it uses that flight profile in several "jumps" to cover large distances at ultra high speed, with a gas stop as it comes back down between jumps.



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 01:16 AM
link   
a reply to: punkinworks10

I wonder where that flight path would take them? cough*russia*cough*northkorea..



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 01:22 AM
link   
i think this forum should have the jackalope icon, were all seeing and hunting things that don't exist lol



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 01:30 AM
link   
a reply to: clay2 baraka

Both times ive seen it, there was some sort of drama in east asia, Korea or china that was nearly ten years ago.



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 01:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: punkinworks10
Might explain the large quantities of nitromethane, that have been purchased and delivered to a particular airbase.

I have posted a couple of times about the pulsating/twinklish fast moving light, that rises from the southeast and passes over the central sierra on a general north west path.

What if it uses that flight profile in several "jumps" to cover large distances at ultra high speed, with a gas stop as it comes back down between jumps.


What particular airbase are you talking about?



posted on Aug, 16 2017 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: SpeedFanatic

i think he is referring to the JP7 in the GAO paperwork. wasnt allot but was enough for people to notice, and why were the tankers still plumed and carrying the JP7 if no declared craft were using it.


was probably used in test of ram jet and aerospikes ADVENT type things, makes more sense with the amount of fuel



new topics

top topics



 
28
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join