It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: GuidedKill
But sex is only for having babies. That's what Nature designed sex for.
originally posted by: MaestroMind
a reply to: TinySickTears
Thank you for your reply. It doesn't matter. Was just curious/confused that's all. Please resume as you were.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: GuidedKill
Not a single person claimed they could.
You re using it as some sort of lame ass argument
Mother nature is a lame ass argument?? I got it.
Back to the stupid I guess
Let's try again
You can be gay or lesbian and reproduce
Oooh sick burn mother nature
If gay people were infertile then your argument would be sound. They're not. Its not.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Moonshinne
But that wasn't enough.
Transexuals and Gays need to be allowed to openly serve in the military.
Anyone who is willing to go and get themselves shot at is alright in my book regardless of what plumbing they have or had.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: GuidedKill
Not a single person claimed they could.
You re using it as some sort of lame ass argument
Mother nature is a lame ass argument?? I got it.
You are picking and choosing Mother Nature.
Mother Nature produces all variants of sexuality/gender.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GuidedKill
We are not talking about species dysphoria. Stay on the topic. Humans are animals so the animal kingdom is revelant.
So how do you explain homosexuality in the animal kingdom?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GuidedKill
We are not talking about species dysphoria. Stay on the topic. Humans are animals so the animal kingdom is revelant.
So how do you explain homosexuality in the animal kingdom?
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: GuidedKill
Not a single person claimed they could.
You re using it as some sort of lame ass argument
Mother nature is a lame ass argument?? I got it.
You are picking and choosing Mother Nature.
Mother Nature produces all variants of sexuality/gender.
But mother nature does not produce humans who can reproduce without the opposite sex.....I'm still waiting on that example..
originally posted by: GuidedKill
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GuidedKill
We are not talking about species dysphoria. Stay on the topic. Humans are animals so the animal kingdom is revelant.
So how do you explain homosexuality in the animal kingdom?
I'm totally on topic....The op was about gay humans beings.
originally posted by: TinySickTears
a reply to: GuidedKill
Can you not see your argument makes no sense?
Gay people can and do have kids. That's a fact
Not my problem if you don't comprendo
originally posted by: kaylaluv
Yes, poor white people have been suffering with no civil rights all these years...
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: ketsuko
How do you explain this?
GuideKill can you explain this?