It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
The doctors signed up to be public servants. They have a moral responsibility to treat the unfortunate. 100,000 annual government salary is enough for them.
originally posted by: annoyedpharmacist
originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: JinMI
That's why I suggested doctors be paid like professors are. A fixed government salary rather than paid on a per treatment basis.
If doctors were not paid well, WHY would someone bust their ass for 8 years of school, plus residency?? Plus taking on hundreds of thousands of loans out? I had to take out 130,000 to get my degree. I would not have done so if the monetary benefit was not there. You do that, and you will get mediocre doctors, and you do not want that.
originally posted by: 3daysgone
How about we forget about health insurance altogether, and let the payment be worked out between the doctor and patient.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance
The doctors signed up to be public servants. They have a moral responsibility to treat the unfortunate. 100,000 annual government salary is enough for them.
After working for 90 hour weeks for 2 years for free on top of their half million dollar student loans?
Hell yeah! I don't see why they shouldn't keep working for free?
originally posted by: 3daysgone
How about we forget about health insurance altogether, and let the payment be worked out between the doctor and patient.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: allsee4eye
How about unifying under the banner that healthcare is too expensive and is in no way proportionate to the care received?
originally posted by: ElGoobero
originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance
And who's going to pay for this?
+1.
NOTHING is free.
EVERYTHING must be paid for.
what the OP means, I think, is 'poor people should get health care paid for by rich people'.
originally posted by: toysforadults
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: allsee4eye
How about unifying under the banner that healthcare is too expensive and is in no way proportionate to the care received?
If you push that narrative youll have to watch your six so you don't get Seth Riched.
It's not isolated either...when insurance and healthcare are free, people don't give any thought to the cost before going to the most expensive place because it's more convenient for them.
We could pay for it, if we stop throwing tax money at the banks and ultra wealthy.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: MotherMayEye
It's not isolated either...when insurance and healthcare are free, people don't give any thought to the cost before going to the most expensive place because it's more convenient for them.
Do you have any #'s to back that up?