Heart attack ‘vaccine’ available in 6 years to knock statins off the shelves

a reply to: seasonal

Oh I agree 100%, statins (currently used ) also found to increase risk T2 diabetes.

It's criminal that physicians and government don't get word out on this.

Big $$$, big lobby $$$ = here take this pill for what ails you.

Cept' what ails you was vis a vis part of the plan, good health has no profit you see.

One might be interested in this recent study comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The disease charts start on page 5. Spoiler alert: the unvaccinated children are healthier than the vaccinated.
Pilot study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated U.S. children

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: carewemust

I have a feeling it is the food pyramid.

When I go to restaurants, it looks like women are ordering healthier than the men. Maybe there are other differences between the makeup of men/women beyond male/female.

Don't forget you "eat" a good percentage of what goes on your body too. Generally at least 20% but with a number of factors that % can be significantly higher, 40 plus. I would bet much of your answer is right there. And of course too many women are shamed into using an abundance of those products and the crap they often contain. Many age a person quicker too, thus increasing reliance.

Let your natural beauty shine as much as possible!

a reply to: seasonal

Pasta=sugar
Bread=sugar
Potato =sugar
Coke=sugar (obvious)

And this is easily verifiable using a cheap blood glucose finger pricker.

Better use the general term Carbs instead of sugar as it may sometime be confusing; at large the wording sugar is used in food for sweet substances, mostly sucrose but also fructose. I now encourage the use of a more "chemical" definition for sugar as being monosaccharides and disaccharides.

My point is all carbs once digested will become monosaccharides. You know sucrose (common sugar) is made of glucose and fructose at ratio 1:1?

Also FYI blood glucose finger pricker give level of glucose, obviously, but do not measure blood fructose, another important "sugar" as you call them.

a reply to: Cofactor

Does this mess with insulin? I assume it does.

blood fructose

And some people do not react to pasta like I do. Some people glycemic load from a potato is minimal. Need to eat and check to see how your bod lives with different foods.

a reply to: seasonal

But what about the statins? There is little proof they do in fact reduce risks of heat attacks. Could it be because heart attacks are not caused by high cholesterol?

People have low mid and high cholesterol all have artery damage.

It is sugar, bad oils, and carbs (sugar). Sugar spikes your insulin, and that leads to all sorts of bad things.

Very well said. I would even say you have reached the heart of the problem!

a reply to: seasonal

Does this mess with insulin? I assume it does.

I'm unsure, but if I remember well fructose is not under regulation by insulin/glucagon. Let me check.

ETA: As I was thinking, fructose is mostly "removed" by fist pass effect by the liver and is not parts of insulin/glucagon regulation loop.

See: Dietary Fructose and Glucose Differentially Affect Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: carewemust

There is alot for research that is s-l-o-w-e-l-y coming out that it is carbs that are bad. In fact if some one is to look at triglycerides, meat has very very little to do with raising them, or your cholesterol numbers, it is all carbs.

What to loose weight-lower cholesterol. Meat-broccoli-meat cauliflower-meat green beans..........

Pasta=sugar
Bread=sugar
Potato =sugar
Coke=sugar (obvious)

And this is easily verifiable using a cheap blood glucose finger pricker.

This is why diabetes is now becoming so prevalent, out cash crop food pyramid. It's a set up and lie, look at where the farm subsidies go.

In this case it is the big food companies that carry the most weight. They lean on the dietitians and are responsible for creating these food pyramids.

This is a great resource.

However while we are focussing on the FDA and the food and drug companies we also need to acknowledge that the biggest problem is the hierarchical structures of authority and the weight of their decisions.

In the end we need to get way from the current prescriptive guideline system and move to a more open system. Currently doctors are being threatened with action such as de-registration for questioning some of the guidelines and informing patients.
Dr Gary Fettke- a Tasmanian Orthopedic surgeon, and Prof Tim Noakes, a South African scientist who specialises in the physiology of exercise, are prominent examples of the sort of witch hunt that can be unleashed on anyone who does not adhere to the party line.

a reply to: Illumimasontruth

Coconut oil is as good or better than a lot of the very expensive and dangerous products that are 100% safe.

a reply to: seasonal

Bullseye. So many health benefits and uses. The medium chain fatty acids are amazing. Best medium temp cooking oil too.

a reply to: seasonal

Coconut oil is as good or better than a lot of the very expensive and dangerous products that are 100% safe.

A low carbs diet high in good fat, like Coconut oil will definitely improve a blood lipoprotein profile; maximizing the reverse transport pathway (HDL) and decrease LDL (endogenous pathway, bad one).

Would you like to know what happen to fructose when it is metabolized by the liver?

a reply to: seasonal

Searching for heart attach vaccine and came up with this other way to skin a cat. What do you think?
A vaccination to prevent heart attacks?

In 2003, a group of researchers in France studying families with very high cholesterol levels and very early heart attacks discovered that PCSK9 was a cholesterol regulator, because they found that mutations in this gene seemed to be responsible for the very high cholesterol levels and the early heart attacks. These mutations are extremely rare and are limited to a few families.

But a research group in Texas discovered that about three percent of the population have different mutations in PCSK9 that have the opposite effect—those with the mutations have low-density lipoprotein (LDL or bad) cholesterol levels about 15 to 28 percent lower than the average level. And the people with that “good” defect have heart attack risks that range from about 47 to 88 percent below average.

“Our reasoning was that nature has already done the experiment; you have people who have won the genetic lottery,” said Musunuru. “They are protected from heart attack, and there are no known adverse consequences. So that led us to reason that if we could find a way to replicate this, we could significantly protect people from heart attack.”

a reply to: daskakik

But a research group in Texas discovered that about three percent of the population have different mutations in PCSK9 that have the opposite effect—those with the mutations have low-density lipoprotein (LDL or bad) cholesterol levels about 15 to 28 percent lower than the average level. And the people with that “good” defect have heart attack risks that range from about 47 to 88 percent below average.

“Our reasoning was that nature has already done the experiment; you have people who have won the genetic lottery,” said Musunuru. “They are protected from heart attack, and there are no known adverse consequences. So that led us to reason that if we could find a way to replicate this, we could significantly protect people from heart attack.”

You can improve a blood lipoprotein profile (increased HDL) simply by going low carbs.

HDL secreted by the liver, absorbs cholesterol in many extra-hepatic tissues. It is like a cholesterol sponge.

a reply to: Cofactor

The article I linked is about gene modification so that a person can have a better blood lipoprotein profile no matter what they eat.

a reply to: daskakik

The article I linked is about gene modification so that a person can have a better blood lipoprotein profile no matter what they eat.

Understood, but why make it simple when we can make it terribly complex, patented and very lucrative, like genetic modification. (obviously sarcasm here)

a reply to: Cofactor

Well, the thread is about the paths of least resistance or least will power.

Genetic modification might be simpler than fighting back the carb oriented munchies.

a reply to: daskakik

Well, the thread is about the paths of least resistance or least will power.

Genetic modification might be simpler than fighting back the carb oriented munchies.

Well yes, and not to mention the infinite possibility of creating constant secondary effects that will require lots of costly medications.

a reply to: Cofactor

Like someone snapping because they went cold turkey off their pasta alfredo?

Seriously though, the thread is about a heart attack vaccine. I just found a different thing being touted as that. The article says that people with the genetic mutation don't show any "adverse consequences". Can you trust them? That is a choice everyone would have to make for themselves.

There are 61 different names for sugar. Even the healthy stuff we eat isn't "healthy." I'd be willing to bet that sugar is responsible for most, if not almost all, of our illnesses.

Yes.

Would you like to know what happen to fructose when it is metabolized by the liver?

a reply to: Cofactor


Turn to fat?