It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because I've not seen it. It' realatively new and talks about nano-thermite.
There was no molten metal found
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: DupontDeux
Because I've not seen it. It' realatively new and talks about nano-thermite.
peace
BS. For one thing energy weapons wouldn't make molten metal so there's no way it could be there, for another thing it was just read hot metal that was found, do your homework, google judy woods energy weapon and learn the real facts and not the BS from the CIA shills like AE truth and NIST.
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: secretagent77
There was no molten metal found
Yes, there was. It's in the films. It was also reported on by many eyewitnesses.
peace
originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: secretagent77
You should do your research , you are giving a bad name to people who don't believe the os
On 25 April 2007 Wood was Plaintiff/Relator in a qui tam[11] petition to The United States District Court, Southern District of New York. In the nature of the Qui tam process, she was acting on behalf of the United States of America. She named a list of 23 respondents headed by Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA) and Science Applications International Corp.(SAIC)[12].
The petition claimed that the respondents acted fraudulently in giving advice to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) during their investigation of the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. The Statement of Case included these words:
"Those who performed work and received payment from NIST are alleged to have engaged in scientific fraud by petitioner, Dr. Wood, a materials engineering scientist, based upon a process of fraud documented by Dr. Wood’s original source research and findings that concluded that the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed by an unconventional energy weapon that can be directed and thus is referred to as a form of what are called “directed energy weapons” (DEW)."
"Dr. Wood has demonstrated that the Twin Towers did not burn up nor did a significant portion of them crash down; they turned to powder in mid air and fire cannot turn a quarter-mile tall building to powder in 8-10 seconds. The respondents herein knew or should have known this and they therefore engaged in actionable fraud within the meaning of the False Claims Act."
After a prolonged series of hearings, addressing the question whether Dr Wood's status was or was not an "original source", the District Court dismissed the petition on 26 June 2008. Wood filed an appeal which was denied by Judge George Daniels on 11 July 2008.
On 14 October 2009 Wood filed a petition for a writ of a certiorari (plea for judicial review) in the US Supreme Court. Briefs on behalf of two respondents were filed during December 2009. The petition was denied on 25 January 2010.[13]