Top-Secret NSA Report Details Russian Hacking Effort Days Before 2016 Election

a reply to: Kali74

If the voter statuses were changed in any significant amount wouldn't we have heard about all the people having issues when going to vote? I would figure that would be a dead giveaway. Not to mention how do you determine which people are and aren't going to go fast a ballot?

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: angeldoll
We need a re-call election. "Attacked the voter registration process".

We NEED a re-call election asap.

So that Hillary can lose again? Oh yes please.

If she does, she does. If Trump should win without all these icky shadows following him, he wins.

He already did. Don't make me post the Obama video again.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: angeldoll
We need a re-call election. "Attacked the voter registration process".

We NEED a re-call election asap.

But there is, as of yet, no evidence the election was actually influenced.

You're right, of course. I just wanted to see the possibility in words.

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: alphabetaone

I am pretty sure I read it properly. Can you explain how it benefits Trump? I see the article say they could have accessed the voter databases and changed things up to skew vote totals but we all know Hillary got more votes. How does spearphishing allow the ruskies to hack the electorial college?

I am pretty sure then that you are ignorant on what spearphishing is. I think you should look it up...or even better, why not go ask any elderly who got scammed out of thousands of dollars thinking they were paying for their grandchildren, if a person can be swayed mentally into it.

a reply to: IAMTAT

How does one define "Rigged"? Obama knew all we know now...and much more.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: IAMTAT

What Obama "said" is irrelevant here.

Nice try.

Please explain why Obama saying there is "no evidence" of election rigging...is irrelevant.

Isn't this supposed to be evidence?

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: RickyD

With some states bound to vote based on state popular winner and other bound to split electorate votes by county... it's possible

IF

votes were changed which there doesn't seem to be evidence of

OR

voter statuses were changed, which the article states is possible.

If we had completely different candidates, I would be all for it....otherwise may as well leave the cesspool alone until the septic disposal unit comes to town.

An entirely new election would be great... toss those two on an iceberg and let them play king of the hill.

I absolutely agree!

Jack Posobiec is losing his mind on Twitter, posting pics of Reality Leigh Winner, claiming she has Luciferian tats on her back.

LOL

She persisted!

heavy.com...

And now reality has slapped Reality in the face.

Her social media clearly indicates this was her pathetic attempt to take down the President.

She and all like her should be hung for sedition.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: IAMTAT

What Obama "said" is irrelevant here.

Nice try.

Please explain why Obama saying there is "no evidence" of election rigging...is irrelevant.

Isn't this supposed to be evidence?

It's irrelevant because he was wrong.

a reply to: IAMTAT

That's what they are trying to hide but it seems they lost the plot. If they successfully turn Rice and Lynch it's game over for a lot of people. They wanted Hillary to win and rigged the election in her favor but the electoral vote tanked their plan. Just imagine rigging an election and still losing because you're such a sh!tty candidate. This is all leading back to Seth Rich and the voter machine manipulation he uncovered.

a reply to: introvert

Sure looked like a whole lot of shadiness going on to me. Also a lot of undisclosed money changing hands around her too. If Trump had that kind of history he would be crucified by now no trial needed...Yet collectively a blind eye is turned to matters Clinton.

a reply to: Kali74

Because goats heads have never been associated with satanism or satan himself...oh wait.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IAMTAT

How does one define "Rigged"? Obama knew all we know now...and much more.

And yet he still did not try to interfere, as far as we can tell.

He let people do their jobs.

a reply to: xuenchen

I felt the same way. This leak is timely, especially with heightened searching for leakers in Govt.

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Doesn't matter. If it was accurate, which it seems it is, then what she was trying to "take down" doesn't matter... if there was nothing to take down it would have been a non-issue.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: IAMTAT

What Obama "said" is irrelevant here.

Nice try.

Please explain why Obama saying there is "no evidence" of election rigging...is irrelevant.

Isn't this supposed to be evidence?

It's evidence that they may have tried. It's not evidence they succeeded.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: IAMTAT

What Obama "said" is irrelevant here.

Nice try.

Please explain why Obama saying there is "no evidence" of election rigging...is irrelevant.

Isn't this supposed to be evidence?

Because it's an attempt to shift the discussion to Obama (a deflection), and not the issue of what the report says.

What he said is therefore irrelevant.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: IAMTAT

What Obama "said" is irrelevant here.

Nice try.

Please explain why Obama saying there is "no evidence" of election rigging...is irrelevant.

Isn't this supposed to be evidence?

It's irrelevant because he was wrong.

And he had access to all the top secret info at the time. I wonder what else he was wrong about?

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: introvert

Sure looked like a whole lot of shadiness going on to me. Also a lot of undisclosed money changing hands around her too. If Trump had that kind of history he would be crucified by now no trial needed...Yet collectively a blind eye is turned to matters Clinton.

That is your opinion. Nothing more.

If you don't mind, I'd like to discuss the matter at hand and not have to deal with a "but Clinton" deflection.