Question for 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Jacobu12

Don't need to be a genius to see there was a back channel connection onging between Al Qaeda ( Bin Laden) and the Saudis.

Twin Towers break apart top to bottom.

You do know there is video available of the collapse?

Have you seen it?

The collapse starts where the impacts happen, not from the top.

[/quote



Chemical like bombs are placed near the core/structural columns to weaken.

edit on 11-7-2017 by Jacobu12 because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12

No, I don't believe that someone wired the building. I've studied the evidence. There was no "mystery" bombs used. It was damage and fire caused by the impact of 2 767 airliners.

Chemically designed bombs got placed just before or just after the plane attacks. The chemical weakened the core support and caused the explosion.

a reply to: Jacobu12

Chemically designed bombs got placed just before or just after the plane attacks.

so which is it?

Before or after?

Chemical like bombs are placed near the core/structural columns to weaken.

No, fairy dust was, where are getting this rubbish info from?

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Jacobu12

Chemically designed bombs got placed just before or just after the plane attacks.

so which is it?

Before or after?

Chemical like bombs are placed near the core/structural columns to weaken.

No, fairy dust was, where are getting this rubbish info from?

I have not got that inside information! I just know the bomb or bombs (it was chemical) was placed on 9/11, not a day before, week before, or a month before.

a reply to: Jacobu12

I have not got that inside information! I just know the bomb or bombs (it was chemical) was placed on 9/11, not a day before, week before, or a month before.

But I do have the inside info and I just told you it wasn't bombs but fairy dust.

Pentagon attack a Popeye SLAM smart weapon was used. They also may have used a AWAC for support and used it to divert attention.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Jacobu12

I have not got that inside information! I just know the bomb or bombs (it was chemical) was placed on 9/11, not a day before, week before, or a month before.

But I do have the inside info and I just told you it wasn't bombs but fairy dust.

I just passing on what i know and i have to be careful as i am online now to be tracked. The 9/11 attack was a covert mission to erase illegal and secretive commercial, banking, military financial transactions ( the paper trail)

a reply to: Jacobu12

Considering the outer columns bowed and buckled to initiate the collapse. The collapse was caused by the portion of the building above the buckling slamming into the floors below. The falling mass broke floor connections and left portions of vertical columns standing as floor connections broke away. This is evident by columns that remained standing for serval seconds after the tower floors completed their total collapse.

What the hell was bombs in the basement going to do for a top down collapse. Especially when the original WTC bombing accomplished verily little, was heard at a great distance, and the 9/11 collapse started at the areas of impact.

No evidence of any steel being worked on by chemical means through metallurgical analysis.

All recovered floor connections showed failure due to overloading.

No video nor physical evidence the core pulled the building down.

You have innuendo and pseudoscience

a reply to: Jacobu12

A Popeye SLAM the size of a 757 got it. You might want to start relying on physical evidence and not "remote viewers".

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12

A Popeye SLAM the size of a 757 got it. You might want to start relying on physical evidence and not "remote viewers".

The remote viewer i know is currently hired by the Pentagon. There is military people who dislike what took place that day and want it be known.

757 plane seen that day was the Boeing E-3. If there was a plane attacking the Pentagon, the public would have seen the plane footage by now.

a reply to: Jacobu12

I had friends at the Pentagon that day that watched Flight 77 fly into the building. It was not a missile of any kind, I do not give a rip of what your "remote viewers" imagined. Although, I am waiting for you to mention Albert Stubblebine.

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12

I had friends at the Pentagon that day that watched Flight 77 fly into the building. It was not a missile of any kind, I do not give a rip of what your "remote viewers" imagined. Although, I am waiting for you to mention Albert Stubblebine.

They're lying to you or you just made this up to discredit me? No plane crashed at the Pentagon. They would have found seats, the black box, cockpit components, engine, where is the wings?

The pilot Hani Hanjour skill level was below standard to fly the 747 at low level.

a reply to: Jacobu12

I don't need to make anything up to discredit you. You did that when you mentioned remote viewers. Pieces of the wings, engines, avionics, airframe, crew and passengers of American Airlines Flight 77 were found at the Pentagon. And, your assessment of Hani Hanjour's skills, does not match up with the people who flew with him and, granted him a commercial pilot's license.

a reply to: Jacobu12

I just passing on what i know and i have to be careful as i am online now to be tracked.

You are online?

Are you CRAZY?

The 9/11 attack was a covert mission to erase illegal and secretive commercial, banking, military financial transactions ( the paper trail)

What the hell is a "illegal and secretive commercial"?

Is that like adds that are too raunchy for normal TV so the commercial gets banned?

If there was a plane attacking the Pentagon, the public would have seen the plane footage by now.

But the public saw the plane impact with their own eyes.

No plane crashed at the Pentagon. They would have found seats, the black box, cockpit components, engine, where is the wings?

Everything you mentioned was found.

The pilot Hani Hanjour skill level was below standard to fly the 747 at low level.

Lucky he didn't try to fly at a low level then, right?

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12

I don't need to make anything up to discredit you. You did that when you mentioned remote viewers. Pieces of the wings, engines, avionics, airframe, crew and passengers of American Airlines Flight 77 were found at the Pentagon. And, your assessment of Hani Hanjour's skills, does not match up with the people who flew with him and, granted him a commercial pilot's license.

Your opinion. The engine found is not a Boeing, first clue a plane did not crash at the pentagon. No part of the wing was found. You got pictures after the fact, that could be doctored or pieces that are from the missile. They sprayed the missile to look like the airliner.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Jacobu12

I just passing on what i know and i have to be careful as i am online now to be tracked.

You are online?

Are you CRAZY?

The 9/11 attack was a covert mission to erase illegal and secretive commercial, banking, military financial transactions ( the paper trail)

What the hell is a "illegal and secretive commercial"?

Is that like adds that are too raunchy for normal TV so the commercial gets banned?

If there was a plane attacking the Pentagon, the public would have seen the plane footage by now.

But the public saw the plane impact with their own eyes.

No plane crashed at the Pentagon. They would have found seats, the black box, cockpit components, engine, where is the wings?

Everything you mentioned was found.

The pilot Hani Hanjour skill level was below standard to fly the 747 at low level.

Lucky he didn't try to fly at a low level then, right?

Witnesses are not reliable. They could be people looking for attention, caught up with news reports of planes crashing, or people who witnessed the AWAC Boeing involved and was flying around the time of the Pentagon attack.

The plane came in at low level to hit the pentagon wall. The wall is reinforced this not like the Twin Towers, it's front is made of glass.

a reply to: Jacobu12

The engine found is not a Boeing

HOLD ON!

now you agree an engine was found?

Just 1 post ago you said that no engine was found.

Earlier you say a bomb or maybe more was planted after the planes struck the buildings and then later said before.

Is this going to be an occurring theme when you post?

You will say one thing and then a few posts later completely say the opposite?

a reply to: Jacobu12

www.aerospaceweb.org... Detailed analysis of the engine wreckage found at the Pentagon, matching the wreckage to an RB-211 engine....the type on the 757 known as American Airlines Flight 77.

originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: Jacobu12

The engine found is not a Boeing

HOLD ON!

now you agree an engine was found?

Just 1 post ago you said that no engine was found.

Earlier you say a bomb or maybe more was planted after the planes struck the buildings and then later said before.

Is this going to be an occurring theme when you post?

You will say one thing and then a few posts later completely say the opposite?

Part of an engine was found. We got other photographs that may or maybe not be Pentagon photos. They could be engine parts found at the 9/11 Twin Tower site.

a reply to: Jacobu12

They could be people looking for attention

You would know a thing or two about that wouldn't you?

now for the absolute GOLD that highlights what I just said about you saying 1 thing and then a post or so later saying the opposite.

The plane came in at low level to hit the pentagon wall.

Did it now?

5 minutes before you posted this, in the post above the one I am replying to you say a plane didn't hit the Pentagon.

first clue a plane did not crash at the pentagon.