President Trump Fires James Comey

a reply to: Xcathdra

Look at the Damage Clinton and Obama did in the 4/8 years they were running things.

I don't see anything.
Can you please show me? You're telling me there's an elephant in the room; provide something to prove that.

Pretend you're the presenter at an inservice. I'm all ears.

a reply to: Xcathdra

The damage Clinton and Obama did will never come near to what Bush did


Moreover, already, Trump has and will treble the damage of all the presidents


BTW, it’s yourself into the partisan talk…

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Your post proves what everyone has pointed out. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Like the Democrats, are you incapable of telling the truth or does the truth scare you so much that you have to invent lies?

Also since your lacking on facts it is the 25th amendment (Presidential succession) and no he cant be removed "very quickly"

You should understand what you are talking about before looking and commenting on anything.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Thank you for proving my point.

Four more years of this nonstop panic over every non-issue is gonna be hilarious. Then when he does actually do something wrong and no one takes you seriously you'll wonder why. Can't wait for the mid-terms. You guys just keep alienating independents, people who think for themselves.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: face23785

And leader and beloved idol Trump lies to you ALL THE TIME!

If Trump was like your ex-leader (s) he'd of used full extent of IC resources at hand to compromise Comey so that outcomes would be to his liking.

Kinda like Obamas and Clintons are well known for doing. The kind of thing people get jail terms for if they have no one in government running interference. I believe that firewall is now down.

Last thing he'd do is fire Comey if his aim or even worry was about "Muh Russia" meme.

originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: Xcathdra

The damage Clinton and Obama did will never come near to what Bush did


Moreover, already, Trump has and will treble the damage of all the presidents


BTW, it’s yourself into the partisan talk…

You tell me im partisan after your post.. LOL ok..

Obama caused more damage than Bush did. Trump is 100+ days in and you already know the outcome and claim he is worse?

speaking of being partisan.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

He can be removed very quickly. That is built into the constitution. Amendment 20-something about a president's disability preventing him from serving. He's proving it for us before we get on that, though.

Are you trying to make the claim he has a mental health issue? No he doesn't.

Trump's mental health is a trending topic on the Internet, on the air, and in newspapers. A petition requesting he be required to submit to a psychiatric evaluation has already received 8000 signatures. This is well meaning, but inaccurate and misguided.

Trump's consensus diagnosis among amateur, at-a-distance diagnosticians is Narcissistic Personality Disorder. They have reviewed the DSM definition (which I wrote) and found him to meet all the criteria: grandiose self-importance; preoccupations with being brilliant and successful; feeling special and having to hang out with special people; requiring constant admiration; feeling entitled; being exploitive; lacking empathy; being envious; and being arrogant. Bingo. Trump is all this in spades.

But they ignore the further requirement that is crucial in defining all mental disorders—the behaviors also must cause clinically significant distress or impairment.

Trump is clearly a man singularly without distress and his behaviors consistently reap him fame, fortune, women, and now political power. He has been generously rewarded, not at all impaired by it.

Psych Today Link

a reply to: burntheships

Says a biased Clinton supporter haha.

I was not a Clinton supporter. Actually, I have had to say that many times when people such as yourself make assumptions.

It is a valid comparison in that the accusations were the same "not doing their job"!

Not doing one's job and using government funds for personal gain are not the same thing.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Why are you unable to accept those facts? Is your hatred of Trump so great that it blinds you to the facts?

We don't know all the facts. The investigation is in it's infancy. We will get plenty of facts from Flynn, Manifort and Stone
when they are called to testify. The CIA has yet to chime in with their Facts....

Grasping at straws much?

All this Clinton, Obama, fake news, obfuscation is a fools errand now...

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

I don't see anything.

Of course you don't.

a reply to: olaru12

Yet you claim there are recorded phone calls between Trump and Russia all the while the DNI/FBI say there was no Trump Russia Collusion...

Grasping at straws much or going for the hypocritical record of the day?

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Since you are apparently lost -

Amendment XXV
Section 1.

In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
Section 2.

Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Section 3.

Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4.

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

Just to clear up any other confusion you might have the 25th amendment is not the same as impeachment.

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: Xcathdra

Why are you unable to accept those facts? Is your hatred of Trump so great that it blinds you to the facts?

We don't know all the facts. The investigation is in it's infancy. We will get plenty of facts from Flynn, Manifort and Stone
when they are called to testify. The CIA has yet to chime in with their Facts....

Grasping at straws much?

All this Clinton, Obama, fake news, obfuscation is a fools errand now...

The investigation is far from it's infancy. It's been going on since the middle of last year. By the way, it's no a criminal investigation, it's a counter-intelligence investigation. If they had found an inkling of any criminal wrongdoing by Trump or any of his people. they would have had to refer it over to another team to begin a criminal investigation. Do you honestly think that could've happened in secret without anyone leaking it? Use your brain.

originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

I don't see anything.

Of course you don't.

dont knock him to hard... No Democrat can see anything... Other than what they want and only if it fits their agenda.

I wonder who Democrats will blame for the losses that are coming to them in the 2018 midterms over their nonsense.

Senator Ron Wyden, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, announced today that he will block confirmation of a Trump nominee until the Treasury Department provides the Senate Intelligence Committee with documents related to Trump’s financial dealings with Russia.

Link

Do Ron Wyden's words carry any weight in US politics given his position ?
Could we imagine RW as a white hat/black hat/....grey hat... funny hat ?

*edit to try to stay on track*

Let's say 'rumours', as in y'know 'rumours' abound
whatever you read here or see ......
the most marking thing for me has been

Trump "didn't feel the total loyalty"

N° 1 reason for Coney's ouster

a reply to: Xcathdra

et you claim there are recorded phone calls between Trump and Russia all the while the DNI/FBI say there was no Trump Russia Collusion...

That's fake news..........

originally posted by: Damiel

Senator Ron Wyden, the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, announced today that he will block confirmation of a Trump nominee until the Treasury Department provides the Senate Intelligence Committee with documents related to Trump’s financial dealings with Russia.

Link

Do Ron Wyden's words carry any weight in US politics given his position ?
Could we imagine RW as a white hat/black hat/....grey hat... funny hat ?

being he is a Democrat most likely not much.

a reply to: olaru12

Well it is from MSNBC -

Full Clapper: 'No Evidence' of Collusion Between Trump and Russia - video interview w/ DNI

White House: 'No evidence' of Trump-Russia collusion

Share to Facebook
2.7KShare to Twitter
Share to Google+


The White House on Monday asserted there is “no evidence” that President Trump’s associates colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election after FBI Director James Comey confirmed a bureau investigation.

“Nothing has changed,” a White House official wrote in an email. “Senior Obama intelligence officials have gone on record to confirm there is NO EVIDENCE of Trump-Russia collusion and there is NO EVIDENCE of a Trump-Russia scandal.”

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

That's a max first term. The absolute max is eight. At least it used to be. Perhaps he's going to sign an executive order declaring that it's a permanent position. And then Vlad can move some stuff into the East Wing

Once again you come across as totally uninformed and lacking any kind of credibility.