It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mwm1331
and how is that a contradiction?
You dont think childhood trauma damages the brain?
Also i must point out that neither article is conclusive nor do the articles themselves show nything other than a statistical correlation. In other words it might be nothing.
But yes I believe gays have some form of brain damage or pshycological disorder.
However that is irrelevant.
God said it is wrong.
Its not my place to agree or disagree.
he decided.
It wouldnt matter if I didn't see anything wrong with it he does
Originally posted by IBM
Jakko, the only way you can prove a baby is born gay is to ask it while an infant not to wait till speaking age or when they are old enough to think logically, thier answers must be indicative of physical desires. So there is really no way to prove that an infant was born gay, and the fact is that they are not born gay.
Originally posted by mwm1331
Well heres the thing jakko I don't belive people are born gay
1) so its saying that taking that drug seems to correlate to a stastistical rise in homosexual offspring. Smoking crack when your pregnant seems to correlate to a statistical rise in crack head offspring.
Awnser to both, Brain damage.
2) Shows that gays do in fact have abnormal brain structures thus implying homosexuality is a birth defect. So what so is being born deaf, thats why we invented hearing aids.
Originally posted by Seekerof
New Genetics Study Undermines Gay Gene Theory
[edit on 10-2-2005 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by mwm1331
Show me where I switched postions. kay.
You misunderstood what I wrote.
Originally posted by Jakko
Originally posted by IBM
Jakko, the only way you can prove a baby is born gay is to ask it while an infant not to wait till speaking age or when they are old enough to think logically, thier answers must be indicative of physical desires. So there is really no way to prove that an infant was born gay, and the fact is that they are not born gay.
IBM, just read the freaking articles about it and stop making a fool out of yourself. It's getting old.
Originally posted by IBM
You have showed me the articles and they are just opinions not scientific fact. Believe me if it was there will be many many scientists trying to replicate the results.
Originally posted by IBM
Jakko, the only way you can prove a baby is born gay is to ask it while an infant not to wait till speaking age or when they are old enough to think logically, thier answers must be indicative of physical desires. So there is really no way to prove that an infant was born gay, and the fact is that they are not born gay.
...I will now add to my ignore list and make you # three. There are certain types of people that I will not associate myself with in real life and I see no reason to subject myself to them on a BB either....
It's the difference between being born gay, and becoming gay in your life. If you do not understand the difference you may need some therapy yourself
IBM, just read the freaking articles about it and stop making a fool out of yourself. It's getting old.
What would be the religious implications ?
for instance, if the Creationists and the Intelligent Desigeners were right about the origin of man, wouldn't the Creator Himself be responsible for the abomination of our DNA ????
Just stop posting in these topics ok, it's really not to be taken serious anymore