It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
Because it's always good to trust someone called Mad Dog in sensitive global political aggressions.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
Because it's always good to trust someone called Mad Dog in sensitive global political aggressions.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
Because it's always good to trust someone called Mad Dog in sensitive global political aggressions.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
Because it's always good to trust someone called Mad Dog in sensitive global political aggressions.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Dark Ghost
Allow me too correct you on something, many American voters fear of Hillary was not that she would lead us into WW3, it was that she would lead us into WW3 and proceed to fight it in a manner other than one leading to a clear US victory. Make no mistake about this, I am neither pro nor anti war... I am of the mindset "if we do this, we pull no punches, we yield to no foreign pressure, we worry about no 'UN consensus', we simply fight it like we own it and leave nothing standing or living in our wake. Hillary sure as hell wasn't the candidate to do that, Trump is still likely to approach conflicts in that manner, however.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
Because it's always good to trust someone called Mad Dog in sensitive global political aggressions.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: burdman30ott6
Then why didn't he bomb where Assad lives?
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
I think people are confused. Some seem to think that if you support Trump, you have to support his actions in Syria.
I don't like what happened, but like you, I also trust General Mattis.
Because it's always good to trust someone called Mad Dog in sensitive global political aggressions.
LOL!!! Oh MY!!!!
Yes but he is a ground pounder, a grunts general. How often have we heard that these sorts are cut out in favor of the polished political general.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Logarock
Too bad we couldn't have John Kerry...who served in Vietnam.
HE was the erudite political diplomat whom managed to negotiate Assad to destroy 100% of Syria's chemical weapons, donchaknow.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Dark Ghost
I frankly don't give a damn about dead Syrians one way or the other, bomb Assad for gaming his own, don't bomb Assad for gassing his own, it matters not to me... but whatever actions this country makes had better make fiscal sense AND only involve US boots on Syrian soil if our intent is to rain down fire and brimstone to win a war, not some ridiculous loser strategy of "winning hearts and minds."[/quote
]
That "loser strategy" you refer to of "winning hearts and minds" was quite effectively employed by Alexander the Great who conquered much of the known world in his time.
The strength of this strategy is that unles you win the hearts and minds of your opposition, you will be forced to slaughter everyone
Everyone
Who oppose you.
Fighters, yes, but also their families, their friends, their allies. Every man, woman, and child, young and old, rich and poor, any and everyone sick or injured who might survive their affliction.
Because if you do not slaughter them all, one or more of them might just overcome their fear of you, fueled by their resentment and grief over their loss, to learn to hate you.
And that hate easily becomes a thirst for retribution and revenge.
originally posted by: jellyrev
MAP OF OBAMA STRIKES
Hahaha, thank you. I mean, I was a little surprised and a little disappointed. Then I had a snack. If he sinks the Russian frigate, then I'll be concerned.