Sara Carter Is Back And She Lets On That Trump Wiretap Traces To The top

Again:

A reporter asked if Nunes had any information to confirm what the President said in his tweets.

Nunes answered no.

The games of disinformation that are played with interpreting/reinterpreting/changing to fit the narrative that some are doing here with what the President said and what Nunes said are more than obvious.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
Again:

A reporter asked if Nunes had any information to confirm what President said in his tweets.

Nunes answered no.

The games of disinformation that are played with interpreting/reinterpreting/changing to fit the narrative that some are doing here with what the President said and what Nunes said are more than obvious.

That is not what you claimed earlier. You lied and then couldn't face up to it.

a reply to: UKTruth

I just quoted what I said earlier.

I clearly stated in reference to the video that Nunes said no "wiretapping."

Apparently, he understands what the word means.

But rail on.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

The person who has said there was no FISA warrant that he knew of was DNI Clapper.

The same man who said there was no surveillance of Trump at Trump tower at the Order of President Obama.

Your man Nunes stood up in front of the public and stated clearly that the documents he made such a big deal about on Wednesday don't show what he claimed, and he said very clearly that there was no wiretapping of Trump Tower.

You can keep lying, and the more you do, the more we will remember it.

9:32 in the video linked above. Your man saying "It appears that all this was legal."

Maybe you believe the video was Photoshopped?

Lol, 'legal' . We're not discussing legalities as was said before.
The spying on Trump and his team by the Obama administration may have been perfectly legal.

Obama has a long and established history of spying on Americans.

(INTELLIHUB) — Former NSA and CIA contractor Dennis Montgomery has direct evidence of massive Obama era spying that targeted prominent Americans throughout the country, according to a report by Freedom Watch founder Larry Klayman. According to Klayman, as well as multiple other sources, Montgomery left the intelligence community with 47 hard drives and over 600 million pages of information which he then sought to come forward with in a legal manner before being stonewalled at all levels of the government. The information taken by Montgomery includes proof of systematic illegal surveillance of prominent Americans, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, 156 judges throughout the country, and prominent businessmen like now president Donald Trump. “Working side by side with Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence (DIA), James Clapper, and Obama’s former Director of the CIA, John Brennan, Montgomery witnessed “up close and personal” this “Orwellian Big Brother” intrusion on privacy, likely for potential coercion, blackmail or other nefarious purposes,” wrote Klayman.

Whistleblower has proof of mass Obama spying, 156 judges and prominent businessmen such as Donald Trump targeted

a reply to: SBMcG

But he wasn't spying on Trump.

UK just admitted it, can you?

a reply to: UKTruth

Your co-poster doesn't seem to understand that.

Perhaps if you remind them?

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

I just quoted what I said earlier.

I clearly stated in reference to the video that Nunes said no "wiretapping."

Apparently, he understands what the word means.

But rail on.

You said:

Nunes has also said, repeatedly, that Trump was not spied on by Obama. /shrug

You were wrong.

Oh, unless you want me to interpret what you meant, but I know you just hate not using the exact words... remember?

a reply to: UKTruth

Last time:

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

The person who has said there was no FISA warrant that he knew of was DNI Clapper.

The same man who said there was no surveillance of Trump at Trump tower at the Order of President Obama.

Your man Nunes stood up in front of the public and stated clearly that the documents he made such a big deal about on Wednesday don't show what he claimed, and he said very clearly that there was no wiretapping of Trump Tower.

You can keep lying, and the more you do, the more we will remember it.

9:32 in the video linked above. Your man saying "It appears that all this was legal."

Maybe you believe the video was Photoshopped?

a reply to: UKTruth

Nunes is focused on getting to the bottom of the details behind Obama's administration spying on the Trump campaign.

:-)

Yeah - that's happening

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: SBMcG

But he wasn't spying on Trump.

UK just admitted it, can you?

Stop lying. You cant seem to help yourself lol.
I said that the spying may have been perfectly legal, not that there was no spying. We already know the Obama administration spied on Trump and and his team.. We should move on from that now and consider the circumstances.

a reply to: UKTruth

You can make an argument that "spied" is not equal to "wiretapped" if you think that is important.

But I've quoted what I said in relation to the video I posted 3 times now.

Everyone can see that.

a reply to: UKTruth

Except no one has claimed they know who ordered the spying.

You claimed the Obama admin is behind it. I've asked for that proof, which you have been unable to provide. The presidential admin consists of many cabinet members. Which cabinet member was it?

If you do not know whom ordered the spying, yet claim it was the Obama admin, it seems you are admitting you have no clue what you are talking about.

It seems your deflection is designed to avoid having to answer the question posed to you in return.

In return.

So not only can you not prove what you claim, you admit to your own deflection.



By the way, I answered the question by saying I don't know.

What I do know is you are unable to comprehend the difference between a statement and a question, as you previously demonstrated.

a reply to: UKTruth

So it's "legal spying" now?

Most people call that surveillance.

Why is "spying" so important to your agenda?

I thought you were waiting for the results of the investigation?

Swinging back again, are we?

PFfft.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

Last time:

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

The person who has said there was no FISA warrant that he knew of was DNI Clapper.

The same man who said there was no surveillance of Trump at Trump tower at the Order of President Obama.

Your man Nunes stood up in front of the public and stated clearly that the documents he made such a big deal about on Wednesday don't show what he claimed, and he said very clearly that there was no wiretapping of Trump Tower.

You can keep lying, and the more you do, the more we will remember it.

9:32 in the video linked above. Your man saying "It appears that all this was legal."

Maybe you believe the video was Photoshopped?

Once again you said:

Nunes has also said, repeatedly, that Trump was not spied on by Obama. /shrug

Remember that you want to use only the words spoken with no interpretation and you don't accept clarifications. That is the standard you held Trump to. If you are held to the same standard then you misrepresented what Nunes said. You lied.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

So it's "legal spying" now?

Most people call that surveillance.

Why is "spying" so important to your agenda?

I thought you were waiting for the results of the investigation?

Swinging back again, are we?

PFfft.

If it makes you feel better then you can say the Obama administration had Trump and his team under surveillance. I prefer the term spying, but knock yourself out.

a reply to: UKTruth

You've told us for days that we can't take Trump literally.

When he said "wiretapping" he meant "surveillance."

You insist on saying that "surveillance" is "spying."

So you've made the argument, for days, that "spying" and "surveillance" and "wiretapping" all mean the same thing in relation to President Trump's tweet ...

Yet, when I say THE SAME THING ... I'm lying?

LOLOL

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

Except no one has claimed they know who ordered the spying.

You claimed the Obama admin is behind it. I've asked for that proof, which you have been unable to provide. The presidential admin consists of many cabinet members. Which cabinet member was it?

If you do not know whom ordered the spying, yet claim it was the Obama admin, it seems you are admitting you have no clue what you are talking about.

It seems your deflection is designed to avoid having to answer the question posed to you in return.

In return.

So not only can you not prove what you claim, you admit to your own deflection.

By the way, I answered the question by saying I don't know.

What I do know is you are unable to comprehend the difference between a statement and a question, as you previously demonstrated.

The Obama administration being behind it is already proven. No name is required, as has already been explained.
You choose to believe that the Executive branch is not responsible for those depts that carry out it's policy. That is your choice, but it doesn't change the fact that they are.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

You've told us for days that we can't take Trump literally.

When he said "wiretapping" he meant "surveillance."

You insist on saying that "surveillance" is "spying."

So you've made the argument, for days, that "spying" and "surveillance" and "wiretapping" all mean the same thing in relation to President Trump's tweet ...

Yet, when I say THE SAME THING ... I'm lying?

LOLOL

I think we are getting in to the same arena of "it depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is".

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: UKTruth

You've told us for days that we can't take Trump literally.

When he said "wiretapping" he meant "surveillance."

You insist on saying that "surveillance" is "spying."

So you've made the argument, for days, that "spying" and "surveillance" and "wiretapping" all mean the same thing in relation to President Trump's tweet ...

Yet, when I say THE SAME THING ... I'm lying?

LOLOL

Merely underscoring your hypocrisy
So if you weren't lying then neither was Trump.
I am glad we can reach agreement at last.