Anyone else sick of hearing how Islam is the religion of "peace"?

a reply to: Taggart

All organized religions are just a way to control man. The books are the tools for this. Believe in a higher power but people need to get out of organized religion and stop the brainwashing.

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: crazyewok



We're talking about a religion in which any criticism of said religion is punishable by death in most of the majority Muslim nations... if peace exists there it is truly peace through violent elimination of opposing viewpoints, AKA genocidal fascism.

"We're talking about a religion in which any criticism of said religion is punishable by death in most of the majority Muslim nations... if peace exists there it is truly peace through violent elimination of opposing viewpoints, AKA genocidal fascism."

Pretty much this.

The day I can draw a picture of Mohumed shaging a dog while eating a bacon sanwich and not fear beung killed is the day I will call it a religion of peace


I see offensive pictures of Budah and jesus all the time yet i dont see buddists and christians going full jihad on them.

So if a guy goes out and criticize our nations and the way we do things, we wouldnt punish them by death?
If an american (Edward snowden) criticize the goverment (NSA) for violations of people rights, the american goverment wouldnt want to kill that guy, would they?

Funny fact, in Denmark, where iam from, i can draw a picture of Mohammed with a bomb in his hat, cause that is free speech, it is illegal, however, to draw that same picture with our queen, instead of Mohammed, cause that is "lèse majesté" (offending the dignity of a monarch)...

Their religion, is their goverment, right? Like our queen in my country, is my "goverment"

How are we any different again?

originally posted by: IAMNOTYOU
So if a guy goes out and criticize our nations and the way we do things, we wouldnt punish them by death?
If an american (Edward snowden) criticize the goverment (NSA) for violations of people rights, the american goverment wouldnt want to kill that guy, would they?

WHAT? Pay attention, please. At any given time roughly 1/3rd of the USA is pissing, moaning, and criticizing the US government publicly and loudly.

Ed Snowden is wanted because he illegally disseminated classified information, not because he criticized the government.

I can draw a picture of Donald Trump in a human centipede with every past POTUS and not run afoul of any laws nor fear for my life. (Although I'm sure somebody would say it was "racist" to disrespect Obama by including him in the drawing, but those people are imbeciles so their tradition of ass is to be expected.)

a reply to: burdman30ott6

What you're assuming is that not one nutjob would want to hurt you out of the 300,000,000 you could potentially offend with that human centipede.


Now take Islam, and drawing Muhammad, how many Muslims in the U.S, 3million is it(?), and how many nutjobs tried to get violent when the Draw Muhammad contest happened?
2. 2 people out of 3million.

Sorry but most (Western) Muslims don't care if you draw Muhammad(pbuh).
They'll think you're an intolerant prick, but the chances of them hurting you are slim to none.

In the West at least. I can't speak for the Middle East. Probably goes up a percentage point of 30 over there.

Which I don't defend. But you understand my original point.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: IAMNOTYOU
So if a guy goes out and criticize our nations and the way we do things, we wouldnt punish them by death?
If an american (Edward snowden) criticize the goverment (NSA) for violations of people rights, the american goverment wouldnt want to kill that guy, would they?

WHAT? Pay attention, please. At any given time roughly 1/3rd of the USA is pissing, moaning, and criticizing the US government publicly and loudly.

Ed Snowden is wanted because he illegally disseminated classified information, not because he criticized the government.

I can draw a picture of Donald Trump in a human centipede with every past POTUS and not run afoul of any laws nor fear for my life. (Although I'm sure somebody would say it was "racist" to disrespect Obama by including him in the drawing, but those people are imbeciles so their tradition of ass is to be expected.)

A lot of Trump supporters would want you in jail or dead, for this disrespect. I know this because of the replies on ATS, tweets or messages all over FB. They call for the deaths of those who call down Trump or to be placed in jail...etc.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: IAMNOTYOU
So if a guy goes out and criticize our nations and the way we do things, we wouldnt punish them by death?
If an american (Edward snowden) criticize the goverment (NSA) for violations of people rights, the american goverment wouldnt want to kill that guy, would they?

WHAT? Pay attention, please. At any given time roughly 1/3rd of the USA is pissing, moaning, and criticizing the US government publicly and loudly.

Ed Snowden is wanted because he illegally disseminated classified information, not because he criticized the government.

I can draw a picture of Donald Trump in a human centipede with every past POTUS and not run afoul of any laws nor fear for my life. (Although I'm sure somebody would say it was "racist" to disrespect Obama by including him in the drawing, but those people are imbeciles so their tradition of ass is to be expected.)

Yes, the guy gave the secret away "Your goverment are LYING to you", he had proof! Others just talk, dont have proof
But it is true, they want him dead, for telling you people the truth!

So yes, you may be allowed to critize, but if you have proof of anything, what do you think they would do to you??

Our culture is different, i agree offcourse, but in the end, the rules are the same, just acted out differently

Well we know that Islam is not the religion of peace. Most Terrorist attacks in the last 20 years the world over are from Radical Islam....not radical athiesm or radical Christianity or radical Judaism or radical scientology. why is that?

originally posted by: amazing
Well we know that Islam is not the religion of peace. Most Terrorist attacks in the last 20 years the world over are from Radical Islam....not radical athiesm or radical Christianity or radical Judaism or radical scientology. why is that?

Simple really, more hate regarding Islam and Muslims which create radicals. More random bombings of innocent families which create Muslims who become radicalized since 9/11.

You can see these attacks have risen since that time.

originally posted by: amazing
Well we know that Islam is not the religion of peace. Most Terrorist attacks in the last 20 years the world over are from Radical Islam....not radical athiesm or radical Christianity or radical Judaism or radical scientology. why is that?

Because the West needed an excuse to invade Middle-East countries, which happen to be Islamic.

What's this, a resident leftist alleging that victim photo's from a terror attack site are paid crisis actors?

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: Konduit
A picture speaks a thousand words. 4chan has already given her the nickname "Moderate Medina".

Propaganda.

She clearly has a distressed look on her face. Who's to say she isn't trying to contact family to tell them the bad news?
Also pictured is a white male who just walks by as well.
Not shown from that angle though.

Aside from the two women, what is anyone in that photo doing to help?

Propaganda, simple as that.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

What's this...

Oh dear I see assumptions coming...

...a resident leftist...

There's one...

Here's a tip, someone disagreeing with you doesn't automatically make them left/right.

... alleging that victim photo's from a terror attack site are paid crisis actors?

...Aaaand there's another...

What on earth are you talking about?

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: amazing
Well we know that Islam is not the religion of peace. Most Terrorist attacks in the last 20 years the world over are from Radical Islam....not radical athiesm or radical Christianity or radical Judaism or radical scientology. why is that?

Because the West needed an excuse to invade Middle-East countries, which happen to be Islamic.

And that's totally true, but it's only half the answer?

a reply to: crazyewok

Every time some says this,or anything Factual about Islam there are all the excusers for Islam what about the Crusades ,what about how many millions Christians killed ,blah blah ,the Japanese were a brutal lot in WW2 cutting off heads left right and Center in China other parts of Asia ,and just being plain barbaric and the Heinous Medical experiments that made the Nazis look like Kindergarten kids , the but changed their ways .Islam will never change and never become civilized or modern thinking ,they want to stay trapped in the Middle ages and expect the rest of the world to follow their suit ,with a bunch of soft sack useful idiots supporting their cause

a reply to: crazyewok

The key here is how those behind the mass immigration and pushing of refugees go around trying to do damage control when the experiment goes bad.

If you repeat long enough that something is good, it will stick like dry crap in a wall, so people around will not longer be able to smell the stench

That is what the mantra of religion of peace is all about.

originally posted by: crazyewok
a reply to: Ohanka

I will be fair on them.


1000-500 years ago they were pretty enlightened and "peaceful" compared to Europe and Christianity and where far ahead politely, socially and scientifically.

But Since then something has happened.

I wonder what would make Muslims so angry with the west...Hmmm

originally posted by: amazing

originally posted by: Necrose

originally posted by: amazing
Well we know that Islam is not the religion of peace. Most Terrorist attacks in the last 20 years the world over are from Radical Islam....not radical athiesm or radical Christianity or radical Judaism or radical scientology. why is that?

Because the West needed an excuse to invade Middle-East countries, which happen to be Islamic.

And that's totally true, but it's only half the answer?

what was the second half of the question then?

I found this review of Muslim religious texts very informative and believe it is worth the watch.