FBI has evidence of Trump campaign collusion with Russia.

a reply to: ColdWisdom


Direct from a Jackasses Mouth .........

" House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes did not rule out Senior Obama administration officials being involved in “incidental” communications of President Donald Trump’s transition team that were “widely disseminated.”
When asked by Breitbart News if he could rule out any involvement of senior members of the Obama administration, Nunes replied, “No, we cannot.”






www.breitbart.com...

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: rickymouse

Absolutely. CNN is not alone in this tactic. Lately it seems if not most are utilizing it and pushing the divide. Go team, not facts.

Funny that this practice is not considered treason because they are attempting to divide the citizens of the country and possibly their actions could promote conflict within our society.

Funny that you never made a peep about the media dividing the country when it was Fox news.

Not funny ha ha, either.

The conservative media was against Obama at every turn. It just "seemed" less dramatic, because FoxNews is the only conservative TV station.

Liberal TV stations are more numerous: ABC-NBC-CBS-CNN-PBS. They are all strongly Anti-Trump, of course. Not just the news..but their comics (SNL, Kimmel, etc.) and their daytime "talk shows" are anti-Trump as well. President Trump is to be applauded for focusing on getting the job done, with so much distracting chatter coming from butt-hurt liberals 24/7.

On the radio side, it's all Rush Limbaugh, Dennis Miller, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin here in the Midwest. There's an intelligent guy named Thom Hartman on the Liberal talk station, but he spends too much time tying current events into past history of the USA. Borrrrring.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: ColdWisdom


Direct from a Jackasses Mouth .........

" House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes did not rule out Senior Obama administration officials being involved in “incidental” communications of President Donald Trump’s transition team that were “widely disseminated.”
When asked by Breitbart News if he could rule out any involvement of senior members of the Obama administration, Nunes replied, “No, we cannot.”







www.breitbart.com...

The name Loretta Lynch is going to pop up alot in the next few weeks. Prepare yourself.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

From the article you referenced..that headline doesn't make much sense...

HEADLINE: House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes did not rule out Senior Obama administration officials being involved in “incidental” communications of President Donald Trump’s transition team that were “widely disseminated.”

*Stretches* Tomorrow's another day.

They will vote for Trumpcare tomorrow, or they won't. I wonder if they fail to pass it, who will be blamed? Who will Trump blame?

Another day another drama.

To all a goodnight.

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
Your title says they have evidence but the post seems to say things like "could", "may", "looks like" etc.

That's exactly what evidence means...it is not proof, so of course they can't say they're absolutely sure. It's an ongoing investigation. If they find proof of what the evidence points to, the maybes will become certainty...just like any other criminal investigation.

a reply to: carewemust

It's Typical Political " DoubleSpeak " . Information about the Identities of American Citizens Revealed in Covert Surveillance of Communications with Foreign Nationals that are Not Involved in Criminal Investigations Must Not be Revealed By Law . In Nunes Opinion , this Law was Violated .

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
I wish I had some image of CNN as a tabloid on a super-market checkout shelf with a cover full of people with half them in the scream pose and the other half in the SMH pose, and the massive headline says "The Day the News Stood Still!" That is the image I get when CNN goes back into this alleged Russian Collusion and anonymous government sources bull jive.

Oh it sure makes for some entertaining arguments back and forth though.

a reply to: Vdogg

CNN and more unnamed officials... LOLOLOLOLOL.. ok

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
This, my friends, is why i defend Trump. Because of these flat out lies.

The article doesn't lie, per se. The headline does, and the article leads you to believe it.

Anyway, more fake news from the leader in fake news

If that's true, then they are a good match for Trump, yes? Tit for tat. CNN's credibility might be poor (on this site), but it's vastly better than Donald J. Trump's (worldwide) at this juncture.

\

No doubt.

ANd he's earned some of that. WIthout getting into examples, I've never liked him, viewing him as petty and small.

But I think the media has beat a drum of lies for over a year. And if it isn't lies, its supposition and "sources say". When I look at DJT, and I look at MSM, im disgusted much less by him. Same goes for the candidate he ran against.

It bears mentioning: the details surrounding any element of this story are so complex that I cannot believe a majority of people are capable of forming an opinion instead of having one grafted onto them.. Remember: half the natio is dumber than the average person you know. With that in mind, im not sure Im concerned with what polls and whatnot say. This isn't about winning an argument. Its about whats right and what isn't.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

From the article you referenced..that headline doesn't make much sense...

HEADLINE: House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes did not rule out Senior Obama administration officials being involved in “incidental” communications of President Donald Trump’s transition team that were “widely disseminated.”

Maybe republican nines didn't, but comey and the FBI did say trump was full of it ..

In fact pretty much saying any investigation was all from the FBI...

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Remember: half the natio is dumber than the average person you know.

Cute.
Which half voted for Trump?

(heh)

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Remember: half the natio is dumber than the average person you know.

Cute.
Which half voted for Trump?

(heh)

The side that won ... Duh

a reply to: rickymouse

I feel exactly the same, I always leaned to the left until last year. I voted out of Europe and supported Trump. I may one day regret what I wished for but the left seem to have seriously lost the plot.

Jeremy Corbyn: I support Trident but let's not arm it with nukes...

Good plan Jeremy, kind of defeats the object of a nuclear submarine.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: Vdogg

They may have some evidence you say?

Well make a thread when they do have some evidence.

This isn't news, it's an allegation.

Not just an allegation, an allegation they already made months ago. This is CNN recycling a story because of the Nunes briefing.

a reply to: GAB4754

Actually, Spicer is saying something different.
He is no longer saying there is only circumstantial evidence. While Nunes, didn't really say anything at all.

www.politico.com...

Hate on CNN as you right wingers will, but the fact is that it has been factually more correct than both MSNBC and Fox News on a consistent basis.....with Fox News finishing dead last in terms of accuracy.

a reply to: SeekingAlpha

All MSM is bullsh1t. CNN are just one of the worst and don't try to tell me that they don't fabricate "news". I remember the green screens in Iraq.

Or was it Libya? Oh wait, it was both.

a reply to: SeekingAlpha

Tell me again, which network ran a story about eleven woman accusing (then) candidate Trump of sexual assault?

And what is the status of those eleven accusations?