FBI has evidence of Trump campaign collusion with Russia.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

Trump himself was not wiretapped, even Nunes isn't claiming he was. What did happen is Trump campaign associates got caught up in the dragnet communicating with entities that were under surveillance. Who those entities were and why they were under surveillance has not been released. I suspect that's not a question Trump is in too much of a hurry to have answered.

a reply to: Phage

I was going to ask the same question about the "proven" comment but I couldn't bring myself to write it in such a way as to not get myself warned or banned,

This xit is getting to be annoying.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Or maybe Obama suggested absolutely nothing of the sort and was busy running the country, which the current President is too busy on Twitter to bother with actually running the country effectively.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: rickymouse

It is my belief that sedition certainly applies and not just on the left side of the spectrum. I would say they are actually doing and their attempts are bearing fruit.

I've been opting to sit back and watch lately. So much is happening and so fast and from my perspective, it only has one end.

When that kind of stuff happens it is never good. Chaos will destroy our country and also everyone's money will disappear. Maybe that is what the ones at the top want, everyone's wealth to disappear. It would bring up the value of our new dollar if everyone's savings was gone. Also the stock market collapsing will not make our personal debt disappear. The banks will own everything, we will have to rent from them. The direction we are going towards is not good for anyone except those who have money invested in other countries and can move there. But if the stock market crumbles, the whole world economy crumbles, gold will not have much value either. If nobody wants it then it has no value. I am sure that the only secure interest will be in your ability to grow food and fend for yourselves and your family.

Hopefully it does not go that far, but it can. The last stock market crash was nothing compared to what can happen.

Btw since when are news outlets so reliant on leaks? It seems journalists who do there own research and investigations are apparently non existent anymore. Kinda strange.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

News organizations will always be reliant on leaks because not many people want to risk their lives and careers to share things that may be unpopular with governments in power.

a reply to: rickymouse

The banks will own everything, we will have to rent from them.

For anyone paying a mortgage, this is already true. Even if you own your home/land, you truly don't own it. Slip on taxes and you know what happens next.

My thoughts is that a culling is in order. What better way to justify it to yourself and have no blood on your hands but to pull the necessary strings and watch us kill ourselves. There is a sick joke being played and the normal folks are the butt.

Trump was doing business with Russia when they had subs off our coast with Nukes. They probably still do.... I'm not surprised he was watched by the NSA and CIA.


www.politico.com...

a reply to: JinMI

I agree. People are being led astray to create this event, but who is actually pulling the strings in this?

originally posted by: rickymouse
a reply to: JinMI

I agree. People are being led astray to create this event, but who is actually pulling the strings in this?

I don't know however I don't think it is a unified correlation such as the ominous NWO. I could be wrong.

a reply to: ColdWisdom

Well...his old campaign manager Paul Manafort admitted that he took $$$$ MILLIONs thru 2009(?) from a Russian businessman to back up Russian (interests).

A few years later? Ta-Da! Working for Mr. Prez.....hmmmm...imagine that. Wake up folks

a reply to: DBCowboy

Obama could have "suggested" that Trump be wiretapped.

It's not an order then.

Hush, you!

That's lawyer talk.

originally posted by: DickBrisket
a reply to: Vdogg

[snip]

Don't hold back now. 😂

a reply to: DickBrisket

CNN typically has a panel of speakers. Each party is represented, so Trump supporters have equal time. I agree that the Trump surrogates surely must be hand picked for dumbassery, as they appear to be much less bright and informed than the other side.

So I guess you have a point.

This, my friends, is why i defend Trump. Because of these flat out lies.

The article doesn't lie, per se. The headline does, and the article leads you to believe it.

Anyway, more fake news from the leader in fake news

a reply to: Vdogg

Yep, that pretty much sums up die hard Trump supporters. The news is only fake when there's bad news about Trump.

I'm just waiting until the SHTF. The excuses should be entertaining!

I wish I had some image of CNN as a tabloid on a super-market checkout shelf with a cover full of people with half them in the scream pose and the other half in the SMH pose, and the massive headline says "The Day the News Stood Still!" That is the image I get when CNN goes back into this alleged Russian Collusion and anonymous government sources bull jive.

Oh it sure makes for some entertaining arguments back and forth though.

originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: Vdogg

Yep, that pretty much sums up die hard Trump supporters. The news is only fake when there's bad news about Trump.

I'm just waiting until the SHTF. The excuses should be entertaining!

The news is fake when it admits in the source article that the headline reported is untrue. But hey, continue the Trump bash.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
This, my friends, is why i defend Trump. Because of these flat out lies.

The article doesn't lie, per se. The headline does, and the article leads you to believe it.

Anyway, more fake news from the leader in fake news

If that's true, then they are a good match for Trump, yes? Tit for tat. CNN's credibility might be poor (on this site), but it's vastly better than Donald J. Trump's (worldwide) at this juncture.