It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(and also the GOP, but they didn't release any information from them).
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burntheships
How does laundering the source suddenly make Russia less culpable?
No, you the one lying...Comey did not call Trump a liar...Comey didn't even say Trump was wrong...What Comey said was that he didn't find any evidence to corroborate Trump's claim...And all that means is that maybe he didn't look very hard, or at all...
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
originally posted by: tribal
if what Vault 7 is true abut the CIA/NSA hacking tools getting out into the wild for potentially anyone to use why is it such a stretch to think that Clinton operating an unsecured server at home could have been accessed by all kinds of ne'er do wells?
and Podestas email password was PASSWORD??? are you effing kidding me?
at this point the only people still believing the BS MSM narrative are believing it because they need or want to....not because theres any compelling evidence.
No I'm pretty sure all the bs defection y'all are trying is not working...
A middleman doesn't AT ALL stop a Russia trump deal....nor slow one down... nor discredit one in any way...
It doesn't even slow one down...
Just like trump , y'all keep twisting comeys words when he flat out stated..
Russia did it..
They did it to help trump win...
The FBI is currently investigating him for it.....
There was literally NOTHING pro trump that comey said....
He even called him a liar over the Obama taping claim...
And a liar over the British obama wire tapping claim..
It was all bad for trump...
And it is noted as well that Comey isn't looking anywhere outside of the Trump camp...The FBI never even looked at the DNC server to look for leaks...
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: butcherguy
Definitely good points.
For whatever reasoning, Comey intentionally made
it clear there was an intermediary.
Yes, he did.
He seemed very willing to cough up info regarding the investigation of Russia.... when he won't let any details out about investigations regarding the only crime that has been committed.... the leaking of classified information to the news media.............Because he won't comment on an ongoing investigation!
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: oxford
What did Seth Richards do at the DNC? Was he an IT guy?
Yes, Seth Rich was an IT guy. Also Wikileaks offered a reward
for information. Now his family, just yesterday is in the
news again pleading for information to find his murderer.
Also there were two people being Guccifer 2.0 because he appeared again online after the first one had been arrested in Romania.
Yes, Guc1 and Guc2.
originally posted by: Iscool
And it is noted as well that Comey isn't looking anywhere outside of the Trump camp...The FBI never even looked at the DNC server to look for leaks...
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: butcherguy
Definitely good points.
For whatever reasoning, Comey intentionally made
it clear there was an intermediary.
Yes, he did.
He seemed very willing to cough up info regarding the investigation of Russia.... when he won't let any details out about investigations regarding the only crime that has been committed.... the leaking of classified information to the news media.............Because he won't comment on an ongoing investigation!
originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burntheships
How does laundering the source suddenly make Russia less culpable?
Reading the CrowdStrike report made it pretty clear that this was all BS. I read real reports on network compromises and if anyone that works with me or for me wrote a report like that and called it evidence, they'd be demoted or fired. Period. Total BS and a non-starter in terms of proof.
originally posted by: mkultra11
Assange very strongly implied that Seth Rich was the DNC leak source and offered money to solve his murder.
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
So how does that change ANYTHING????
It would be helpful in eliciting a more succinct response if you
did not quote the entire post, then ask a vague question.
However....
Are you saying since they used a middle man that it doesn't count?!?!
Obviously, It proves that Russia did not directly give the emails to Wikileaks.
And are you conveniently ignoring the conclusion
Is there was NO Trump collusion with Russia?