It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Comey to Congress: Russians Did Not Give Podesta’s Emails to WikiLeaks

page: 2
32
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:10 AM
link   
a reply to: Ohanka

Um... No. The things revealed on Monday are only going to intensify the questions and discussion. This isn't going away anytime soon and it is only going to get worse for Trump. You might want to get used to it.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: tribal
if what Vault 7 is true abut the CIA/NSA hacking tools getting out into the wild for potentially anyone to use why is it such a stretch to think that Clinton operating an unsecured server at home could have been accessed by all kinds of ne'er do wells?


Yes, and it was tossed about at the time it could also have been a
rouge IC who did not have confidence in The Clintons.



and Podestas email password was PASSWORD??? are you effing kidding me?


but Russians!




at this point the only people still believing the BS MSM narrative are believing it because they need or want to....not because theres any compelling evidence.


Yes, and there are a lot of people who want to believe!



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

So how does that change ANYTHING????


It would be helpful in eliciting a more succinct response if you
did not quote the entire post, then ask a vague question.

However....



Are you saying since they used a middle man that it doesn't count?!?!


Obviously, It proves that Russia did not directly give the emails to Wikileaks.


And are you conveniently ignoring the conclusion
Is there was NO Trump collusion with Russia?


edit on 22-3-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: burntheships

Whoever uploaded that clip deliberately cut out the answer to which Comey continuously referred.

"same answer"
"same answer"
"same answer"

Well, what is that answer?

Leaving that out makes me very suspicious. There is usually a reason when someone presents something without its context.


Please find the entire clip if you can.

I watched one that is a cut up of various parts, it appears
the ranking Democrat Schiff was trying to coerce Comey
in naming a private person, which Comey refused to do.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: burntheships
Is English your third or fourth language? I am asking this because you seem to have a problem with understanding what was being said. He said Russia was responsible for wikileaks getting the emails they just used a middle man.


Not exactly what he said.

He said Guccifer and DC Leaks as far as they could tell
( barring that Vault 7 proves someone can have a Pocket Putin)
released leaks that were attributed to Russia.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: butcherguy

Yes, he did.
He seemed very willing to cough up info regarding the investigation of Russia.... when he won't let any details out about investigations regarding the only crime that has been committed.... the leaking of classified information to the news media.............Because he won't comment on an ongoing investigation!


Exactly.

And the ranking Democrat led him with questions,
kind of seemed like a set up, which for the most
part Comey dodged, except that one question.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
How does laundering the source suddenly make Russia less culpable?


What exactly has Russia done?

Please elaborate.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:46 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

They hacked the DNC and dumped the leaks to wikileaks (through an intermediary). There is currently an investigation to see how much further influence Russia has had on our election, so there may be more in the future.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: oxford

What did Seth Richards do at the DNC? Was he an IT guy?


Yes, Seth Rich was an IT guy. Also Wikileaks offered a reward
for information. Now his family, just yesterday is in the
news again pleading for information to find his murderer.



Also there were two people being Guccifer 2.0 because he appeared again online after the first one had been arrested in Romania.


Yes, Guc1 and Guc2.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka
Great. What a total waste of time and resources this charade is.

Can the warmongering left move on to something else now?


No, its all they have. Clinton lost....

Now its "I see Russians everywhere".

Which is a total complete joke, as Obama and his DOJ
gave Russia a huge pass right during his last weeks
with the Rosneft deal.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 11:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: burntheships

They hacked the DNC and dumped the leaks to wikileaks (through an intermediary).


Vault 7 proves that there is software that is called "Pocket Putin".

Not saying Russia couldn't have done it, but why would they
leave fingerprints on purpose?


There is currently an investigation to see how much further influence Russia has had on our election, so there may be more in the future.


Great, I am all for finding the facts on Russia.

But so far we have NO Trump collusion, No hacking of voting machines,
no direct link to Podesta emails and DNC emails to Russia.


edit on 22-3-2017 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:02 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

My bad ..

On my phone so it makes a lot of copy paste irritating.

I'm trying to teach myself to stop quoting for the most part since I got an admin message mentioned it uses unnecessary space.

But old habits die hard.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
But so far we have NO Trump collusion

So far, but the cronies he surrounds himself with are starting to look guiltier and guilier

No hacking of voting machines,

This isn't a thing that anyone has accused the Russians of doing.

no direct link to Podesta emails and DNC emails to Russia.

It's already been proven by an independent investigator that Russia hacked the DNC (and also the GOP, but they didn't release any information from them).
edit on 22-3-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:14 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

They didn't conclude that at all...

In fact the FBI said EXACTLY the opposite. They said that yes there was a still ongoing investigation since July, into exactly that....


And the FBI doesn't get an investigation going unless they already have evidence of it...


It was ALL BAD for trump...

No obama didn't request him being wiretapped..

No the British didn't wire tap him...

Yes Russia had specifically interfered on the behalf of trump.


Yes the trump campaign was presently under investigation for possibly making a deal with Russian intelligence..

His only win was on something no one was saying in the first place....

That the Russians hacked the machines.. which was never part of the conspiracy....



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

No worries, noted.

I am all for being civil, I detest the level to which
some are sinking in manners, and I try not to go there.

If I do, please someone slap me.




posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Comey flat out said Russia specifically had done it to hurt hillary and help trump..



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Comey flat out said Russia specifically had done it to hurt hillary and help trump..

He also said that no RNC emails were leaked, which was incorrect.
Unless our FBI Director is woefully uninformed or inept.... he lied.
edit on b000000312017-03-22T12:21:51-05:0012America/ChicagoWed, 22 Mar 2017 12:21:51 -05001200000017 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Comey flat out said Russia specifically had done it to hurt hillary and help trump..


But CrowdStrike told the DNC about "Russian" hacks long before the election.

Proving the DNC failed.




posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: burntheships


In fact the FBI said EXACTLY the opposite. They said that yes there was a still ongoing investigation since July, into exactly that....



Yes, but from Comeys comments it appears he is well aware that
this investigation was started as a politically motivated smear campaign.

He has been stating this for over half a year.



And the FBI doesn't get an investigation going unless they already have evidence of it...


So far, they have found exactly....NOTHING.



It was ALL BAD for trump...


Not the way half the country sees it, it would be
bad for Trump if they had found anything, anything at all.

But again what have they found?



No obama didn't request him being wiretapped..


Still under investigation, and just getting started.



No the British didn't wire tap him...


You think they would admit it?

Drone strikes are classified and never disclosed by
Governments because they are top secret.

But they happen all of the time and kill many.



Yes Russia had specifically interfered on the behalf of trump.


Not what Comey said. In fact the whole Russia thing is
a lot of "we suspect". Russia is a Communist Country, USSR.
They are going to continue to spy on everyone because
they need money. And the way they get it is through
stealing information and secrets.



Yes the trump campaign was presently under investigation for possibly making a deal with Russian intelligence..


Again, nothing found yet, nothing zip.
This is a politically motivated investigation.


His only win was on something no one was saying in the first place....

That the Russians hacked the machines.. which was never part of the conspiracy....


Nancy Pelosi is on record with her paranoid Russia rant.
I'll find it. So was HRC.

When it suits them, because they LOST.



posted on Mar, 22 2017 @ 12:28 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships



Yes, but from Comeys comments it appears he is well aware that this investigation was started as a politically motivated smear campaign. He has been stating this for over half a year.


I've not heard that. Can you provide a source with Comey's exact words?

Thanks in advance.



new topics

top topics



 
32
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join