Comey to Congress: Russians Did Not Give Podesta’s Emails to WikiLeaks

Congressional hearings begin; FBI James Comey testifies under
oath in regards to many issues, including leaks to the press
from the DNC, and Podesta emails that were published by
Wikileaks. The ultimate take away here from these specific
comments; Comey clearly states there was not a direct
link from Russia to these Podesta email leaks.

He explicitly states there was an intermediary, not a direct
link from Russia to Wikileaks. Granted, the Dem member
questioning him does not look happy with his answer.



March 20th, 2017

Comey mentioned that the FBI is investigating the leaks of secret information to the press and he told the House Intelligence Committee the investigation is still underway and he would be unable to discuss matters linked to the investigation.

However, the most important piece of information that Comey disclosed to Congress was that the Russians did not provide WikiLeaks HIllary’s campaign manager John Podesta’s emails. www.thegatewaypundit.com...

Comey clearly states there was an intermediary.
The implications are staggering, while this proves that Wikileaks was truthful
in that they did not receive the Podesta emails from Russia, it also
begs the question who was the intermediary?

A few theory's come to mind, I'll name a few.

1. A DNC whistleblower, who was rightly angered by the
DNC rigging of Candidate HRC.

2. An IC insider who wished to remain anonymous.

3. Seth Rich - perhaps he found "evidence" of hacking and was
going to expose it. Completely innocent and good intentions.
His discovery interrupted another plan.

Or, a combination of the above, or ?

In any case, we now have it directly from the FBI Director.
Russia did not deliver the emails.

I doubt this will put an end to the endless Russia narrative,
but those who are looking for the truth can at least factor this in.

a reply to: burntheships

The Podesra emails, like Hillary's server may have been compromised by multiple persons/groups before the Wikileaks disclosures.
Guccifer, the hacker that got imto Sid Blumenthal's emails, stated that he hacked Hillary's server and rhat there others in there tpo.

a reply to: butcherguy

Definitely good points.

For whatever reasoning, Comey intentionally made
it clear there was an intermediary.

if what Vault 7 is true abut the CIA/NSA hacking tools getting out into the wild for potentially anyone to use why is it such a stretch to think that Clinton operating an unsecured server at home could have been accessed by all kinds of ne'er do wells?

and Podestas email password was PASSWORD??? are you effing kidding me?

at this point the only people still believing the BS MSM narrative are believing it because they need or want to....not because theres any compelling evidence.

originally posted by: burntheships
Congressional hearings begin; FBI James Comey testifies under
oath in regards to many issues, including leaks to the press
from the DNC, and Podesta emails that were published by
Wikileaks. The ultimate take away here from these specific
comments; Comey clearly states there was not a direct
link from Russia to these Podesta email leaks.

He explicitly states there was an intermediary, not a direct
link from Russia to Wikileaks. Granted, the Dem member
questioning him does not look happy with his answer.

March 20th, 2017

Comey mentioned that the FBI is investigating the leaks of secret information to the press and he told the House Intelligence Committee the investigation is still underway and he would be unable to discuss matters linked to the investigation.

However, the most important piece of information that Comey disclosed to Congress was that the Russians did not provide WikiLeaks HIllary’s campaign manager John Podesta’s emails. www.thegatewaypundit.com...

Comey clearly states there was an intermediary.
The implications are staggering, while this proves that Wikileaks was truthful
in that they did not receive the Podesta emails from Russia, it also
begs the question who was the intermediary?

A few theory's come to mind, I'll name a few.

1. A DNC whistleblower, who was rightly angered by the
DNC rigging of Candidate HRC.

2. An IC insider who wished to remain anonymous.

3. Seth Rich - perhaps he found "evidence" of hacking and was
going to expose it. Completely innocent and good intentions.
His discovery interrupted another plan.

Or, a combination of the above, or ?

In any case, we now have it directly from the FBI Director.
Russia did not deliver the emails.

I doubt this will put an end to the endless Russia narrative,
but those who are looking for the truth can at least factor this in.

So how does that change ANYTHING????

Are you saying since they used a middle man that it doesn't count?!?!

Why would that stop them from making a deal with trump ???

Wouldn't the middle man have been required for plausible deniability???


Oh Russia didn't hack our machines either, but no one ever claimed they did either....

a reply to: burntheships

Whoever uploaded that clip deliberately cut out the answer to which Comey continuously referred.

"same answer"
"same answer"
"same answer"

Well, what is that answer?

Leaving that out makes me very suspicious. There is usually a reason when someone presents something without its context.

originally posted by: tribal
if what Vault 7 is true abut the CIA/NSA hacking tools getting out into the wild for potentially anyone to use why is it such a stretch to think that Clinton operating an unsecured server at home could have been accessed by all kinds of ne'er do wells?

and Podestas email password was PASSWORD??? are you effing kidding me?

at this point the only people still believing the BS MSM narrative are believing it because they need or want to....not because theres any compelling evidence.

No I'm pretty sure all the bs defection y'all are trying is not working...

A middleman doesn't AT ALL stop a Russia trump deal....nor slow one down... nor discredit one in any way...

It doesn't even slow one down...

Just like trump , y'all keep twisting comeys words when he flat out stated..

Russia did it..

They did it to help trump win...

The FBI is currently investigating him for it.....

There was literally NOTHING pro trump that comey said....

He even called him a liar over the Obama taping claim...

And a liar over the British obama wire tapping claim..

It was all bad for trump...

originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: burntheships

Whoever uploaded that clip deliberately cut out the answer to which Comey continuously referred.

"same answer"
"same answer"
"same answer"

Well, what is that answer?

Leaving that out makes me very suspicious. There is usually a reason when someone presents something without its context.

The facts are front page stories all over the country...

It even seems to me that the ATS/trump opinion has plummeted in the last couple days..

Now it's the same 10 people dropping propaganda to defend him.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox


So how does that change ANYTHING????

It doesn't. It just solidifies all the facts that the left idiots have been denying for months. It proves that Assange was factual and didn't lie.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: tribal
if what Vault 7 is true abut the CIA/NSA hacking tools getting out into the wild for potentially anyone to use why is it such a stretch to think that Clinton operating an unsecured server at home could have been accessed by all kinds of ne'er do wells?

and Podestas email password was PASSWORD??? are you effing kidding me?

at this point the only people still believing the BS MSM narrative are believing it because they need or want to....not because theres any compelling evidence.

No I'm pretty sure all the bs defection y'all are trying is not working...

A middleman doesn't AT ALL stop a Russia trump deal....nor slow one down... nor discredit one in any way...

It doesn't even slow one down...

Just like trump , y'all keep twisting comeys words when he flat out stated..

Russia did it..

They did it to help trump win...

The FBI is currently investigating him for it.....

There was literally NOTHING pro trump that comey said....

He even called him a liar over the Obama taping claim...

And a liar over the British obama wire tapping claim..

It was all bad for trump...

What Russia/Trump deal are you talking about?

Comey is showing he is quiet the Obama/Clinton puppet....

a reply to: burntheships
Is English your third or fourth language? I am asking this because you seem to have a problem with understanding what was being said. He said Russia was responsible for wikileaks getting the emails they just used a middle man.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: butcherguy

Definitely good points.

For whatever reasoning, Comey intentionally made
it clear there was an intermediary.

Yes, he did.
He seemed very willing to cough up info regarding the investigation of Russia.... when he won't let any details out about investigations regarding the only crime that has been committed.... the leaking of classified information to the news media.............Because he won't comment on an ongoing investigation!

originally posted by: Gothmog
Comey is showing he is quiet the Obama/Clinton puppet....

So only Obama puppets try to expose Putin puppets?

originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: burntheships
Is English your third or fourth language? I am asking this because you seem to have a problem with understanding what was being said. He said Russia was responsible for wikileaks getting the emails they just used a middle man.

He knows...

He just is purposfully trying to spout propaganda...

a reply to: burntheships

How does laundering the source suddenly make Russia less culpable?

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: tribal
if what Vault 7 is true abut the CIA/NSA hacking tools getting out into the wild for potentially anyone to use why is it such a stretch to think that Clinton operating an unsecured server at home could have been accessed by all kinds of ne'er do wells?

and Podestas email password was PASSWORD??? are you effing kidding me?

at this point the only people still believing the BS MSM narrative are believing it because they need or want to....not because theres any compelling evidence.

No I'm pretty sure all the bs defection y'all are trying is not working...

A middleman doesn't AT ALL stop a Russia trump deal....nor slow one down... nor discredit one in any way...

It doesn't even slow one down...

Just like trump , y'all keep twisting comeys words when he flat out stated..

Russia did it..

They did it to help trump win...

The FBI is currently investigating him for it.....

There was literally NOTHING pro trump that comey said....

He even called him a liar over the Obama taping claim...

And a liar over the British obama wire tapping claim..

It was all bad for trump...

What Russia/Trump deal are you talking about?

The one where trump commited treason in exchange for telling an opponent nation to release hacked US gov. Documents on Donald's political opponent..

You know the one that is on the front page of every paper this morning...

It's funny you have not addressed all of the falsehoods U listed in your op..

originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: burntheships

Whoever uploaded that clip deliberately cut out the answer to which Comey continuously referred.

"same answer"
"same answer"
"same answer"

Well, what is that answer?

Leaving that out makes me very suspicious. There is usually a reason when someone presents something without its context.

"classified"
"classified"
"classified"

I thought Assange had made this crystal clear really alluding that it was Seth Richards that was the leak, and also that the hack was not state sponsored by Russia.

What did Seth Richards do at the DNC? Was he an IT guy?

Also there were two people being Guccifer 2.0 because he appeared again online after the first one had been arrested in Romania.

Great. What a total waste of time and resources this charade is.

Can the warmongering left move on to something else now?