It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
a reply to: Raggedyman
I just want someone to really prove Jesus existed. There is no evidence that I've read that has ever proven to me without a shadow of a doubt that Jesus ever walked this earth as a person and not a myth.
I am sorry you dont understand history
Jesus is the most well documented Man in history, more than any other, ever
Disbelieve everything ever written, disbelieve every account, every word, every story and you are still left with His teachings
You can disbelieve His teachings but you cant deny they were His teachings, even today they are radical.
originally posted by: digital01anarchy
originally posted by: Substracto
If JC was alive today, most of his followers would deny him, especially the republicans, cause JC would be a socialist, the Vatican wouldn't exist, or if it did, it wouldn't be made of gold and walled like is it, and he would have one hell of a manly beard, hipsters would like him.
Actually jesus didn't follow the rules of men he followed the rules of god so chances are he wouldn't have a earthly political communist/socialist dream for our world more likely an authoritarian based rule of gods will. I laugh at all the lefties who actually believe jesus would subscribe to their lunacy like he would come back in a rage agaisnt the machine shirt and carl Marxist manifesto clutched to his body preaching the benifits of communism lol
Hipsters lol wouldn't like him because he is supposed to bring the sword in his next role! jesus was the savior of mens souls in his first life! His second life he is going to defeat the devil and turn earth into paradise so he has to fight the antichrist! Hipsters are a fasion tread!
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: djz3ro
I still don't believe it's a monk, how about you prove that first
So he is a man, where is the proof of anything, at least prove he was a monk not an American Indian sitting cross legged on holidays
I can prove no more Jesus existed than you can prove the assumed monk on display was a real monk, that you can prove anymore than he once lived is all you have
You have nothing, so go wee in someone else's pocket
You don't believe, I get that, so what. I do, get over yourself, your opinion holds no valid reason to me.
If I read a story about Napoleon, I decide if I believe or not, you make your own decissions and welcome to it
Stop Bitchin and moanin at me, believe don't, it's you who are responsible for what you decide. As I said, Christs teachings are real and tangible to me, that's enough
originally posted by: Argus100
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: djz3ro
I still don't believe it's a monk, how about you prove that first
So he is a man, where is the proof of anything, at least prove he was a monk not an American Indian sitting cross legged on holidays
I can prove no more Jesus existed than you can prove the assumed monk on display was a real monk, that you can prove anymore than he once lived is all you have
You have nothing, so go wee in someone else's pocket
You don't believe, I get that, so what. I do, get over yourself, your opinion holds no valid reason to me.
If I read a story about Napoleon, I decide if I believe or not, you make your own decissions and welcome to it
Stop Bitchin and moanin at me, believe don't, it's you who are responsible for what you decide. As I said, Christs teachings are real and tangible to me, that's enough
You're having a conversation on a forum where you asked for proof of something, it was provided, then you say done riduculous nonsense about monkey costumes and tell the person to quit bitching and moaning at you.
Yikes!
originally posted by: Raggedyman
No I just asked for proof not assumption
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
Egypt is in Africa,
so I have no idea what you are on about.
originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: Revolution9
Until I got to the bottom I was trying to figure out why YOU were censoring cush In the first sentence I thought it mean Moses' wife was a cute woman.
Is there some hipster meaning I am unaware of that would cause it to be censored?
originally posted by: Raggedyman
Well there is more evidence for Jesus than any other dead human being
originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Gentleman made the claim that we have Platos hand written discourses, no one claimed that of Jesus.
There is less accounts outside of "Plato's works" of his existence. Can you prove his existance by the same qualifiers you require of others for Jesus?
Plato never existed then?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Meanwhile, Jesus was a preacher and we aren't even sure he could read or write, so there aren't any works left behind from him. I mean I know that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John existed. Or at least people we are attributing those names existed. Because those four wrote the Gospels. But that doesn't mean that Jesus himself existed.
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
Egypt is in Africa,
so I have no idea what you are on about.
Egypt is transcontinental, it's in the Northeast corner of the African continent, it's also in the Southwest corner of the Asian continent...
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Meanwhile, Jesus was a preacher and we aren't even sure he could read or write, so there aren't any works left behind from him. I mean I know that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John existed. Or at least people we are attributing those names existed. Because those four wrote the Gospels. But that doesn't mean that Jesus himself existed.
I've always wondered about MAtthew, Mark, Luke and John, such fine English names for people who were from the Middle East...
I've always wondered about MAtthew, Mark, Luke and John, such fine English names for people who were from the Middle East...