It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: olaru12
good thing that most of a wall was already completed in ca
tear it down
build it better
That's a fence and hasn't been completed in 20 years. They're still building it.....
How many years will it take to even draw up the plans for a proper wal?
You're in a fantasy Trumpland.
originally posted by: Justso
a reply to: Annee
The American people would never agree with shoot to kill. Remember, the west coast and the southwest are heavily Mexican.
The original laws are on the books-just need to remove O's executive orders.
Shoot to kill is war-that's not gonna happen.
However, something has gotta be done with Mexico and the lawlessness, poverty and immigration problems. But a wall? Rhetoric-silly rhetoric-and no one is gonna shoot to kill.
My heart goes out to their suffering though and being in the building business-I have never ever seen harder workers.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Most coastline on both coasts isn't approachable by boats or subs outside existing ports. Boats entering from international destinations require documentation upon entry. There's a few areas a cartel drug running sub can dock without notice but that's not how large numbers of illegals are entering.
Actually, they're using suped-up small power boats on the west coast.
Coast Guard had to get new boats to catch them.
That's drugs, not human trafficking.
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: carewemust
What's the point? Are we going to ban people from entering the US from Mexico on work visas? Or on vacation? The Polish illegal immigrants don't walk across the border, they take a vacation to the US, then they stay.
I guess it will cut it back some, which is good, but I really don't think it's going to make much of a difference.
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
a reply to: carewemust
If it happens, He's got my first vote ever in 4 year's time.
originally posted by: Kromlech
LOL, LIBERALS: "DURRRR, Illegal aliens, Muslims, and foreigners first!" HAHAHAHA, thanks for getting Trump elected.
On March 16, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security announced that there would be a halt to expand the "virtual fence" beyond two pilot projects in Arizona.
Contractor Boeing Corporation had numerous delays and cost overruns. Boeing had initially used police dispatching software that was unable to process all of the information coming from the border. The $50 million of remaining funding would be used for mobile surveillance devices, sensors, and radios to patrol and protect the border. At the time, the Department of Homeland Security had spent $3.4 billion on border fences and had built 640 miles (1,030 km) of fences and barriers as part of the Secure Border Initiative. en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
. . . kudos to the man who had the hojos to recognize one is needed, and proposed it be built.
originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: carewemust
What's the point? Are we going to ban people from entering the US from Mexico on work visas? Or on vacation? The Polish illegal immigrants don't walk across the border, they take a vacation to the US, then they stay.
I guess it will cut it back some, which is good, but I really don't think it's going to make much of a difference.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Annee
OMFG
less than a week in office and we got a "you didnt build that"
You do realize Trump is only picking up what Obama and Bush did before him in building the wall
so you go from he cant do it to obama already did
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
. . . kudos to the man who had the hojos to recognize one is needed, and proposed it be built.
He didn't.
Those who came before him did.
Construction was stopped for reasons.
Now, if Trump can solve those "reasons" - - - good for him.
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: NarcolepticBuddha
. . . kudos to the man who had the hojos to recognize one is needed, and proposed it be built.
He didn't.
Those who came before him did.
Construction was stopped for reasons.
Now, if Trump can solve those "reasons" - - - good for him.
Well, seeing as how I never heard anybody propose this wall before
And seeing as how you failed to provide any sources to validate your claim..
I have no option but to say, go, Trump, go!