It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mast3rshake2049
To OP. its not that i fundamentally disagree with you, im telling you flat out, you are wrong. i say this as a composer and producer. all art is subject to the eye (or ear in this case) of the beholder. your argument is, well i like one thing and everything else that isnt that is garbage. art is anything that was artificially created to provoke an involuntary emotional response.
skrillex to many millions provokes an extreme emotional response in that it gets the adrenaline flowing and the blood pumping. in the same way that a furious orchestral piece might do the same. your argument is based entirely on personal preference. but what really proves that you dont know what your talking about is when you say that modern artists depend on computer sound effects. sound effects are just that, effects.
originally posted by: TroliusMaximus
There is systematic "dumbing-down" of all facets of society, and it has been underway for decades:
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I think it is forgotten by many but BAD music exists during all time eras. We only remember the good stuff. But for how much the OP is waxing poetic about classical music, there is JUST as much crap from the Baroque and Classical periods as there is today.
originally posted by: StarSirius
Very interesting point.
As a musician myself I must say that in my opinion music has changed dramatically over the years and at a tremendous rate - not to mention the technology that is now available to the artist.
Personally I don't use MIDI (well, not much) but I do appreciate it and it certainly has its place. Audio is my preferred choice but as mentioned above it would be a little more difficult in a real time situation, and MIDI is easier to quantise etc...
Recording is becoming more user friendly too meaning that its more affable to the end user meaning more potential artists/artists are using them.
originally posted by: Maroboduus
a reply to: supermilkman
Your comment about "moral degradation" in music is nonsensical, if not downright stupid.
Your blanket generalization that "chaotic" music is somehow inferior, and shouldn't be considered pleasant... So only things that you like constitute real music? There are supremely talented musicians who make exceedingly chaotic music. Theread are many who play with the very concept of what should be considered music. There are whole genres of music called "noise" music. Some of the most inegligent people I know listen to such things. Your personal taste doesn't define what should and should not be considered music, or what should be considered music in the first place. That is a truly ignorant and conceited opinion. Classical music is no more or less valid than other forms of music. Music evolves. Tastes change and evolve. To equate that to a "dumbing down" is legitimately foolish.
originally posted by: Maroboduus
originally posted by: supermilkman
That's not really talented.
They also come off devilish.
If they aren't talented, then I would love to see you write and perform a heavy metal song. I mean, it should be super easy, since it doesn't require any talent, right?
And that comment about them coming off "devillish" is embarrassingly naive and quaint.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
a reply to: supermilkman
I don't know. Is this less intelligent?
m.youtube.com...
originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: supermilkman
Music may seem to not conform because artists wish to try and create something new and different. The more and more new artists come about, the more they try to push what may have not been done yet. Also music creation is becoming much easier to achieve now with software and synths, so overall music is being created on mass instead of only a few artists bringing out music once in a while.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: supermilkman
Now you show your idiocy yet again...stick to songs about buildings & food
originally posted by: Maroboduus
Don't be foolish. You're painting entire artforms and industries with a single broad brush, which is something that only a fool would do. There are still amazing movies, music, games, etc being produced. Just because you are ignorant of them doesn't mean that they don't exist
And your arbitrary standard of a video game needing to rely upon fast twitch reflexes in order to be good is.... well, dumb.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: mast3rshake2049
To quote Mike Muir from Suicidal Tendencies.. "Just cause you don't like it, don't mean it ain't no good"
Your critique is strikingly similar to critics of Mozart in the late 1700s:
The famous complaint of Emperor Joseph II about The Marriage of Figaro - "too many notes, Mozart"
How about critics of Bach:
1737, by one-time Bach pupil JA Scheibe: "[Bach] would be the admiration of whole nations if he had more amiability, if he did not take away the natural element in his pieces by giving them a turgid and confused style, and if he did not darken their beauty by an excess of art."
Beales shows that Joseph genuinely appreciated Mozart’s music and greatly admired his operas. - wiki
As for the 'moral decay' bit:
An Associated Press article reported that on Sunday, December 2, 1956, The Rev. Carl Elgena told his Des Moines, Iowa, congregation that “Elvis Presley is morally insane” and “by his actions he’s leading other young people to the same end.” He warned the over 800 members in the pews of the Grand View Park Baptist Church that “the belief of unholy pleasure has sent the morals of our nation down to rock bottom and the crowning addition to this day’s corruption is Elvis Presleyism.” Holding up magazine pictures and articles depicting some of the singer’s alleged actions, the minister declared, “When I was a boy, if a person had done things like this, he would have found himself in jail.”
I wonder what people have said about the music you like to listen to?
originally posted by: Maroboduus
originally posted by: supermilkman
a reply to: supermilkman
I also find this more interesting compared to most of your metal music.
It's overwhelmingly obvious that you are completely ignorant of huge swathes of metal music. You're using idiotic blanket generalizations again. Not all metal is the same, or even remotely close. There are bands like Swans, Khanate, etc., that bear no resemblance whatsoever to what you foolishly believe to represent all heavy metal as a whole. But your ignorance hasn't stopped you from spouting foolishness thus far, so I'm sure that doesn't actually matter to you.
And your repeated comments about computer editing and sound effects are amazingly foolish and ignorant. They are tools to make music, just like any other instrument. If you actually follow through with your completely juvenile logic, all instruments would be unsophisticated. Guitars are a tool to make sounds. There are various ways to change the sound. So those must be unsophisticated, because the sounds are produced artificially. Same with amplifiers, and pianos, and so on and so on and so on. There is no difference, aside from your completely arbitrary standards, which bear no weight and are supported by zero logic.
originally posted by: Maroboduus
originally posted by: supermilkman
You say the Mona Lisa is simple? Ok, go ahead and paint a copy of one.
You say modern music is simple and unsophisticated? Okay, go write and perform a good pop song. Hwavy metal is simple? Go write and perform a good heavy metal song.
See how that works? Your own argument doesn't hold up to your own standards.
Your complete lack of self-awareness is almost as incredible as your general ignorance. Almost.