It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Architectural Orders are the ancient styles of classical architecture, each distinguished by its proportions and characteristic profiles and details, and most readily recognizable by the type of column employed.
Three ancient orders of architecture—the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian—originated in Greece. To these the Romans added, in practice if not in name, the Tuscan, which they made simpler than Doric, and the Composite, which was more ornamental than the Corinthian.
The Architectural Order of a classical building is akin to the mode or key of classical music, the grammar or rhetoric of a written composition. It is established by certain modules like the intervals of music, and it raises certain expectations in an audience attuned to its language. - Wikipedia[2]
originally posted by: supermilkman
There is still good music being produced but what I mean is music that deviates from classical order.
There is still good music in the world but much of it really isn't music, despite being popular. A lot of is disharmonious and chaotic which shouldn't be pleasant to the ear.
originally posted by: FelisOrion
Did you ust compare skillrex to some stupid symphony? Why are you even comparing classical music to pop?I like classical but it is just sridiculous to compare the two
originally posted by: Tiger5
originally posted by: supermilkman
There is still good music being produced but what I mean is music that deviates from classical order.
There is still good music in the world but much of it really isn't music, despite being popular. A lot of is disharmonious and chaotic which shouldn't be pleasant to the ear.
I think that your title is wrong it is not a question of music dumbing down. It is merely that popular music has changed. Classical music was actually the pop music of its time. Opera was simply the MTV acts or Rock Operas of modern times. The ancient waltzes were a damn sight more lascivious than the modern pallid versions. Nowadays we are producing by far more acts that have the benefit of classical music education. It is unreasonable to assume tastes to stagnate why produce the music of the past?
Miles Davis, Chick Corea and Herbie Hancock all acknowledged the debt they owe to the classical masters.
That's the point. Music that deviates from classical order is dumbed down. Classical order is sophisticated while other music is just relying on sound effects, computer editing software etc.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: supermilkman
Actually, if you look into the history of musicality in prehistory, you learn that one of the first instruments were percussive, certain rocks being bashed against one another would issue certain tones according to their size and density. After that, it is said that bashing logs with sticks, and eventually the elephant skin drum came about. Some cultures which existed back in the mists of time had nothing but drums and vocal utterances to make their music with, and this was the case for quite a long time.
It could be argued, and probably should be, that some forms of modern music are closer to prehistoric log thumping, skin smacking, and so on, than classical music is, and therefore closer to the origin point of all musicality, than the very complicated, highly finessed music of the classical and baroque periods.
Now, that being said, I prefer the carefully modulated, finely crafted works of Ludwig Van Beethoven, or J.S. Bach to the techno tribalism of Skrillex and Co., but that does not mean that their particular style has no meaning or merit, just that it is not to my taste. Given that it resembles most closely the most ancient of all forms of music, we cannot discard it utterly. We can only say that we do not like it, that we prefer the pretense of civilisation over the obvious tribalism inherent in some modern music.
For my part, I am a metalhead. I like music which combines these things in harmony with one another. The rampant percussion of a Dimmu Borgir track is fused in all cases with a neoclassical element, a nod to the composers we know and love from the period of outlandish wigs, gaudy outfits, and corsets so tight as to render the lady wearer unconscious. Therefore it provides a synergistic outcome, ignoring nothing, encompassing everything, for a well rounded and often beautiful finish.
originally posted by: hephalump
a reply to: supermilkman
Music speaks to the soul. No two souls are identical. It stands to reason that tastes in music will differ.
I happen to be a huge fan of classical music...string quartets in particular. But certain electronic music is appealing, too.
Different strokes for different folks. Doesn't mean dumbed down. It means it's different.
You don't like it, that's fine, many do, however, like skyrillix (or however it's spelled).