Whistleblower Clinton Foundation CEO Missing, Presumed Dead

a reply to: mOjOm

WND is not even nearly the only or main source of information regarding the many murders or suspicious deaths of people who crossed the Clintons.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Ok. Well that was the only link I was given in that post.

So what else is there???

I assume it will be more far right wing tabloid type websites that have a stake in pushing those stories.

I mean if any one of them had some evidence backing up what is said why isn't she on trial for them??? Some 30+ cases of possible wrongful deaths and yet not one actual charge against her for any one of them??? Seems strange.

originally posted by: Greven



Eric Braverman is married to Neil Brown, from KKR.

Neil Brown has been busy attending various conferences including some overseas.

His husband is probably with him, and they're probably enjoying themselves during the holidays.

Okay, your link to the climate solutions conference shows a pic of Neil Brown. Your link to the Mining Investment conference only had a quote from him about a previous conference:

“I thought the discussions were very, very good in terms of content” Neil Brown, Director, KKR Institute

That is not proof that he attended this year's conference which ended December 1st. This was after the climate solutions conference which began on November 21st.

a reply to: mOjOm

It is not really so strange that they have not been convicted. They are the Clintons.
There have been many threads on this forum devoted to the death list.
And - do you really expect MSM or left-leaning sites to cover this?

The Clinton Body Count

a reply to: mOjOm

I have no affinity for WMD, just happened to be the first of many internet links dealing with the question....would you prefer I find a more middle of the road website discussing the same topic with the same conclusions?

a reply to: BlueAjah

What does that mean, "They're the Clinton's". I mean, yes they're powerful and all that but there is still a limit what you can get away with.

Not one case in 33 mysterious deaths has anything solid??? People aren't guilty until proven innocent.

I'm not saying you're wrong. But like this thread, something isn't correct by default. You have to prove a claim not the other way around. Innocent until proven guilty is how it works.

a reply to: WilliamtheResolute

If you're going to accuse someone of 33 possible murders I'd think you need much more than a neutral website and some theories.

I'm not saying there isn't something there, I mean it wouldn't surprise me if there was. But that narrative is being pushed all the time by the right wing and yet they never have any solid evidence for any of it. It's just constant propaganda.

That isn't responsible journalism or even honest reporting.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: BlueAjah

What does that mean, "They're the Clinton's". I mean, yes they're powerful and all that but there is still a limit what you can get away with.

Not one case in 33 mysterious deaths has anything solid??? People aren't guilty until proven innocent.

I'm not saying you're wrong. But like this thread, something isn't correct by default. You have to prove a claim not the other way around. Innocent until proven guilty is how it works.

Is it possible that some people are above the law and can never be proven guilty......?

a reply to: WilliamtheResolute

Sure it's possible. But if she's that powerful you would think she'd have the power to do many other things too which she can't. Like rig an election in her favor or keep scandals from having her name attached to them. But she can't control those things either. So maybe she isn't as powerful as you think.

a reply to: Noncents

Questioning it is great. Doing the Chicken Little routine, screaming that he's "missing" and "presumed dead" when neither have been formally announced by any credible source is just ridiculous. Conversely, just straight up calling it a "hoax" is also a very bad idea, because again, nothing has been formally announced either way.

If the FBI, who are still actively working on the whole Clinton debacle, know there's a guy who leaked a whole sh!tload of incriminating data that could possibly get him killed, what do you think would be the smartest move? Think about this rationally.

Hillary Clinton. The woman whom every single hater on this site insisted, ad nauseum, was capable of rigging the election, ordering anyone who stood in her way to be summarily snuffed; who was so mighty and so powerful that simply by getting elected, would trigger immediate nuclear war with Russia...that same Hillary Clinton? And yet the whole internet is all in a dither because the person ostensibly responsible for bringing the evil beast down by leaking all her dirty laundry isn't announcing his continued survival and painting a veritable bull's-eye on his forehead?

I don't know about you, but if I were the FBI, I'd probably have this guy locked away somewhere really secure, and let the internet detectives keep wondering. Hell...if I were the actual guy, I wouldn't have waited for someone to protect me. Would you?

If the dude doesn't show soon, either they'll have to launch an investigation or they'll have to make some kind of announcement. But spreading rumors either way is only creating drama. Of course, that's the purpose of the thread, but in the interest of common sense, we shouldn't jump to conclusions until we know more. Either way.

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: BlueAjah

What does that mean, "They're the Clinton's". I mean, yes they're powerful and all that but there is still a limit what you can get away with.

Not one case in 33 mysterious deaths has anything solid??? People aren't guilty until proven innocent.

I'm not saying you're wrong. But like this thread, something isn't correct by default. You have to prove a claim not the other way around. Innocent until proven guilty is how it works.

Your living in a sincerely naive world if you can not correlate that many people (who had dirt on the Clintons) that met untimely deaths as alarming! Reminds of that picture of one who has their head lodged up ones ars!

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: WilliamtheResolute

Sure it's possible. But if she's that powerful you would think she'd have the power to do many other things too which she can't. Like rig an election in her favor or keep scandals from having her name attached to them. But she can't control those things either. So maybe she isn't as powerful as you think.

Well for starters she side stepped any complicity in the Benghazi debacle and managed to avoid an FBI investigation of her email server....could it be that Obama and the DOJ have her back? I believe that WikiLeaks and the Podesta email hack painted a pretty damning picture of Hillary and her operation....just ask Bernie about the knife in his back. I am merely speculating about all this because no matter what I think of the Clinton's personally I think they are pretty much Teflon as long as their party is in power. It is going to be very interesting to see what Trump thinks about the Clinton Crime Family Charity when he has the power.

Im not saying the Clintons are murderers, but clearly they aren't good people. Just look at Bill's buddy Epstein the pedo and their trips to Orgy Island. Look at the claims from all the women. Look at the corruption of the Foundation. Mysteries about the Clintons need to be investigated, these are untrustworthy, powerful people.

originally posted by: sad_eyed_lady

originally posted by: Greven



Eric Braverman is married to Neil Brown, from KKR.

Neil Brown has been busy attending various conferences including some overseas.

His husband is probably with him, and they're probably enjoying themselves during the holidays.

Okay, your link to the climate solutions conference shows a pic of Neil Brown. Your link to the Mining Investment conference only had a quote from him about a previous conference:

“I thought the discussions were very, very good in terms of content” Neil Brown, Director, KKR Institute

That is not proof that he attended this year's conference which ended December 1st. This was after the climate solutions conference which began on November 21st.

A quote from him isn't proof? Do they just invent them?

The original claim was that Braverman went missing after October 12th. That's more than a month afterwards. It's been less than a month and a half since the conference.

Seriously, this is stupid. Unless someone reports them missing, they ain't missing.

Internet speculation doesn't count.

a reply to: tigertatzen
I've managed to find his husband active in public since his spouse's alleged disappearance. I see no reason to do the research for these morons who can't even find that with a simple internet search (they now say Neil Brown is missing too).

Honestly, twitter activity as evidence someone is missing because he infrequently tweets and hasn't during the last couple of months... it's #ing sad what goes believed these days based on that kind of 'evidence.'

a reply to: sirlancelot

Thanks, that was such a reasonable assessment of who I am.

I just said I'm not saying it might not have some truth to it somewhere. I'm not a Clinton fan or anything. But I'm skeptical about everything to some degree. Especially when it's all Right Wingers pushing it and nobody else and they have no actual proof of it. Just coincidence.

These are the same people who also push stories about her being a Demon, or Possessed, or that Michelle Obama is a man and Obama is the Founder of ISIS.

I think a little skepticism is valid here.

a reply to: WilliamtheResolute

Using the DNC to back stab Bernie is one thing. Murdering 30+ professional and well established members of society is another.

a reply to: [post=21710152]mOjOm[/post

"These are the same people who also push stories about her being a Demon, or Possessed, or that Michelle Obama is a man and Obama is the Founder of ISIS.

I try to keep an open mind, I think I can accept the fact that Hillary is possibly a Demon and that Michelle is really Michael, as far as Obama being the founder of ISIS I think he would have to share that honor with Hillary......I may be a little alt-right but Hillary and Obama are a lot alt-Left...also known as Progressive/Socialist...AKA..Communist.

originally posted by: Greven
Another hoax.
Please stop with the hoaxes.

Someone not using twitter for a couple of months, especially one who historically is not a regular user, does not mean he is missing.

It's Republican, all there is are hoaxes to promote

originally posted by: WilliamtheResolute

I try to keep an open mind, I think I can accept the fact that Hillary is possibly a Demon and that Michelle is really Michael, as far as Obama being the founder of ISIS I think he would have to share that honor with Hillary......I may be a little alt-right but Hillary and Obama are a lot alt-Left...also known as Progressive/Socialist...AKA..Communist.

And that would put an end to any kind of rational discussion we were having I think.

I'll just let myself out. Thanx for inviting me. You have a lovely home.......

originally posted by: mOjOm

originally posted by: WilliamtheResolute

I try to keep an open mind, I think I can accept the fact that Hillary is possibly a Demon and that Michelle is really Michael, as far as Obama being the founder of ISIS I think he would have to share that honor with Hillary......I may be a little alt-right but Hillary and Obama are a lot alt-Left...also known as Progressive/Socialist...AKA..Communist.

And that would put an end to any kind of rational discussion we were having I think.

I'll just let myself out. Thanx for inviting me. You have a lovely home.......

Apparently a little sarcasm isn't well received by the nice person in California......