It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Damiel
So... there we go, everyone happy ?
The USA has a new president.
Where are you seeing that?
The fact texas will vote trump by state law.
Which will give Trump 306 and no faithless electors - if you are right about Texas not allowing faithless electors.
originally posted by: Khaleesi
My quote function is all messed up. Let me try again. A majority is 270. Correct? A plurality would be having the most votes but not reaching 270. Am I stating that correctly?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: LSU0408
I know, but I'm still seeing 268
She lost four electors in Washington, even if she gained all of Texas she would still have 266 and it would go to the Congress where she would lose.
originally posted by: Khaleesi
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
My quote function is all messed up. Let me try again. A majority is 270. Correct? A plurality would be having the most votes but not reaching 270. Am I stating that correctly?
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: neo96
In Australia we call campaign vote and get a result in 6 weeks flat this is like Days of our lives in comparison
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: ketsuko
Uhm no - under US Federal law / US Constitution the needed votes from the electoral college is 270. Anything less than that the House of Reps vote for President and the Senate votes for V. President.