Why I Agree with the Georgia Guidestones to a NWO and You Should Too!

a reply to: Annee

GMOs might just be how "They" achieve our population reduction or kill off a significant percentage of the people of Earth. Our food chain is not something we want to mess around with.

I relies the potential GMOs have to offer Humanity but at what cost we really don't know yet, extreme care has to be taken,l if we want to mess around with GMOs better to do so off world i imagine.

a reply to: testingtesting

It's easier if we just kill undesirables.

I understand it was done last century with mixed results.

Maybe 500m get to stay on earth and the rest get deported to mars as slave labor?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Annee

GMOs might just be how "They" achieve our population reduction or kill off a significant percentage of the people of Earth. Our food chain is not something we want to mess around with.

We've been altering crops for ages.

I don't buy the GMO hysteria.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: testingtesting

It's easier if we just kill undesirables.

I understand it was done last century with mixed results.

The Philippine's are doing it now.

a reply to: Annee

Yes but there is tampering with something and then there is what we are up to. All I'm saying is its possible worth considering not crapping on our own door steps before fully understanding the implications of our actions.

But when have humanity ever looked before we have leaped.

The saying "just because we can do a thing does not mean we should" springs to mind but let's face it, when has humanity ever invented a tool she did not use. Never.

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: muzzleflash

And stop evolution, forever bind mankind to this earth and prevent them from reaching for the stars and achieving there true manifest destiny, to maintain the position of the unworthy elite and to oppress the mass much reduced into more manageable and controllable numbers into there position of endless indentured servitude.

To restore the hunting ground's for the playful super elite and establish an endless empire over the tiny dominion that is the earth.

To appease the enemy's of mankind and to seal them in this nature reserve forever cutting off there natural avenue of advancement.

To establish once more the self proclaimed and illegitimate elite in there unworthy position's of power, an elite that have consumed there own race in order to prevent any from below themselves from surpassing them and to keep there stolen power over those that they ALLOW to live on as slaves.


Oh so we should agree, sorry we are waiting for them and when they make there move by god we will make our's.

I did not argue any of those things.

You are failing to read what I said and interpret it properly.

I am used to that though. This topic especially has been skewed by a lot of disinformation and misinformation and people have been manipulated into going against what they actually believe in by logical fallacies.

I've been around long enough to know all about the arguments you make but I respectfully must make you aware of the fact that those arguments do not necessarily apply and interpretation can create an entirely different thought process.

You should at least try to see what I'm trying to say here.

Bare with me, Logic is subjective, to continue along the economic avenue and divert our races potential into keeping the bankers going is Illogical.

To work on establishing high intensity GM free crop's, New archietecture to make better use of space and provide MORE space for people and nature, to invest in clean energy and by making it a government controlled asset ensure there is a surplus of this free energy and remove the stranglehold of corporate big oil from it, to invest in hydroponic's and sea farm's, to invest in RE-Seeding the natural environment and put a stop to unsustainable practice by replacing it with sustainable practice.

Subterranean architecture and infrastructure, unified high rise architecture and infrastrucure (high rise is just as good for farm's as it is for people and offices and even high rise environment's for nature can and could be created with the same impetus, a high rise with rainforest on each floor and a method for creatures to navigate it with water cycling and minimal human management and maintenance.


So killing people off, reducing the gene pool to a small select group lacking genetic diversity and minimizing genetic drift while preventing some disease would also open up the mass of those people to shared genetic weakness, a lack of diversity in there gene pool would make them more suseptible to nature's biosphere not less, they would also slow down in there adaptation to environment and other factor's eventually becoming a static species and if you believe in evolution you have to acknowledge that when a species stagnate's it then almost inevitably in almost all known cases eventually become's extinct through it's inability to adapt to changes.

Crocodiles and sharks' are efficient with the same design as there ancestors and very long species existence but they are adaptable and HAVE changed considerably in other way's to there ancestor's so they are a poor counter argument on that point.

I see NO logic in the florida guide stone's but I do see desperation in those that believe they offer a solution, what I see in them is an Ideological view point mired in the extreme right wing view of a distinct minority of over entitled rich people and misguided right wingers whom believe they can create a utopia for there select ideological chosen slaves and master's by mean's of mass culling and sterilization of there own species, in fact from a species perspective they are a very serious disease that threaten's the species they plan to target and that make's them a pathogen upon that species, a parasite not a symbiote.

while the stones arent really saying anything irrational they are still stupid. sounds like a controlled Utopian society. id rather have freedom. maybe i dont want to live in harmony with nature. maybe i wanna have 20 stupid kids. the earth isnt going anywhere and neither is life. were simply not that important. nothing changes if we all die. nothing changes if we destroy the entire planet(which we wont). striving for a perfect Utopian society is childish. letting progress come naturally through the human species being free to express themselves is more rational and actually achievable.

a reply to: muzzleflash

When I first heard of the guidestones and number 1 it reminded me of something I read about a civilization in the Star Wars universe. This civilization created gigantic floating city ships they lived in that hovered above the surface of their lush planet, Only setting foot on the surface for special occasion or religious events. If humans can be united under a single cause as in creating similar ships and send them to other worlds to live on then the population of the planet could and would drop without a mass die off.

In my personal opinion I think there is to much deep seeded philosophy and hatred among the peoples of the world to ever unite as it is now. Maybe the ones left over from whatever is going to happen will. It all seem so petty considering whats out there...

Force will be required.

Definitely.

a reply to: LABTECH767

they can create a utopia for there select ideological chosen slaves and master's by mean's of mass culling and sterilization

in terms of galactic presence
7 billion is not a lot

a highly advanced dominant species within the galaxy
would have a high/growing populations
220 billion ?

originally posted by: kibric
a reply to: LABTECH767

they can create a utopia for there select ideological chosen slaves and master's by mean's of mass culling and sterilization

in terms of galactic presence
7 billion is not a lot

a highly advanced dominant species within the galaxy
would have a high/growing populations
220 billion ?

Where do you come up with these numbers?

a reply to: kibric

For our race to survive we have to leave the earth - not entirely but to establish a living presence in space and elsewhere, I agree with Hawking on that though he is not the origin of that saying.

You are correct, even 220 trillion would not be a dominant presence the universe is nearly infinite at least as far as our conception goes and there is more than enough room not only for us but for a near infinite number of other sentient race's out there.

If either of these is actually a dyson sphere or nearly a sphere and they are not a runaway machine culture then how large would there population be?.
www.sciencealert.com...

That of course is the ultimate use of architecture on a solar system scale for energy, space and habitat and if proven would likely indicate a vastly ancient civilization or race whom have have also solved interstellar travel though perhaps not faster than light travel hence there turning there skill's to making the most of what they have.

a reply to: Annee

ok a bit off
www.worldometers.info...

a highly advanced dominant species within the galaxy would have a high/growing populations 220 billion ?

if humans were going to continue to survive within the universe
our populations have to spread and grow
just like natural world

i estimated 220 billion and growing spread out among the galaxy
but your right i don't know what other dominant species are out there

how many would you consider a dominant growing species within the galaxy ?

a reply to: LABTECH767

at least as far as our conception goes and there is more than enough room not only for us but for a near infinite number of other sentient race's out there.

likely inevitable
given the intelligence man has achieved
and the vastness of space
the natural worlds diversity
revolving around procreation

That of course is the ultimate use of architecture on a solar system scale for energy, space and habitat and if proven would likely indicate a vastly ancient civilization or race whom have have also solved interstellar travel though perhaps not faster than light travel hence there turning there skill's to making the most of what they have.

some where something is doing it
or has done it or will do it

originally posted by: kibric
if humans were going to continue to survive within the universe our populations have to spread and grow just like natural world

I estimated 220 billion and growing spread out among the galaxy.

Oh, OK.

Wasn't sure if you meant on earth or leaving 🌏.

I'm a big supporter of expanding beyond earth. But, also "healing" earth.

a reply to: Annee


yer the final frontier
some how the star trek template for human civilisation works
exploration

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: amazing

There is more than enough resources and space on this planet for billions of more humans if we just manage our resources properly.

Have you read up on the polluted oceans lately?

Do you expect cooperative volunteers to adhere to strict regulations?

Our pollution is a direct result of the industrial age and the nuclear age that followed it. We're now entering the information age and renewable energy age. Things are already changing. New technologies are already being developed. We'll be okay. We do need government's help or more accurately, we need governments to stop bowing down to their corporate overlords...big oil, big coal, big auto, entrenched power company monopolies etc.

But again, the big lie is that there isn't enough room or resources. There are plenty and we're slowly discovering how to do it.

a reply to: muzzleflash

I agree with the Georgia Guidestones 100%

I do not agree with the Georgia Guildstones at any percent.
Any time someone or some group spends that kind of money to make a monolithic symbol with a written diatribe of what they feel are values that should be revered by all, is propaganda overlying and agenda. Pure and simple. Parts of it are probably very logical, but if you take it into your belief system, you have been manipulated to that end.

If we all got together, as a people and discused those values and designed something like that.... totally different scenario.